It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Polls - what do people think of the OS?

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 04:14 PM
link   
Polls...

In August 2004, 911Truth.org commissioned Zogby International for a poll that concluded "half (49.3%) of New York City residents and 41% of New York citizens overall say that some of our leaders "knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act."

In May 2006, 911Truth.org commissioned Zogby International for a poll that concluded 45% of voting Americans think "Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success."

In August 2006, Scripps Howard/Ohio University conducted a poll that concluded, "more than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East."

In October 2006, a poll was conducted by CBSNews/New York Times that said, "only 16 per cent of respondents say the government headed by U.S. president George W. Bush is telling the truth on what it knew prior to the terrorist attacks."

In September 2007, 911Truth.org commissioned Zogby International for a poll that concluded "51% of Americans want Congress to probe Bush/Cheney regarding the 9/11 Attacks."

In November 2007, Scripps Howard/Ohio University conducted another poll that concluded, "nearly two-thirds of Americans think it is possible that some federal officials had specific warnings of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, but chose to ignore those warnings."

In December 2007, a poll was conducted in Hudson County that showed residents, "are more likely than not to believe that U.S. government officials chose to ignore warnings about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks."

In September 2008, a poll was conducted that showed, "there is no consensus outside the United States that Islamist militants from al Qaeda were responsible."

Then there's the first CNN poll, the second CNN poll, the MSNBC poll, and the Showbiz Tonight poll, all of which were very much in favor of the views held by members of the 9/11 Truth Movement community.




posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 04:19 PM
link   
reply to post by OmegaPoint
 


I think the official story is the most accurate portrayal of the events of 911. Is it perfect? Probably not, but its mostly right.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 04:22 PM
link   
In on of those polls, I forget which one, 15% believed the twin twoers were brought down with explosives (which they in fact were), a number to be expected due to the fake causal connection and ruse, that the plane strikes were the sole cause of the destruction of the buildings.

But until well over half of American and international citizens come to uniderstand that 9/11 was some form of MIHOP (made it happen on purpose) and until an alternative historical viewpoint is offered to that pedalled by the mainstream media, and officially santioned government reports like the 9/11 Commission and NIST reports, the work goes on.

All in all, given what we were up againgst, I think that the 9/11 Truth Movement has done a bang up job getting the word out and educating the public, while bypassing the mainstream media and overcoming extreme prejudice and bias, and absurd ad hominem attacks.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 04:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
reply to post by OmegaPoint
 


I think the official story is the most accurate portrayal of the events of 911. Is it perfect? Probably not, but its mostly right.

Well, before you draw a final conclusion HDNB, please review very carefully the following video evidence. Thank you .



[edit on 24-9-2009 by OmegaPoint]



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 04:30 PM
link   
reply to post by OmegaPoint
 


Thanks I have actually seen that before, but I watched it again. Those "explosions" can simply be explained by air pressure escaping through the weakest windows it can find. When something pancakes like that, it compresses the air in the elevator shafts, etc, which then escapes through the weakest windows in the floors below.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 04:39 PM
link   
9/11 was definately an inside job. Even with people saying that the towers just couldve come under extreme pressure and force what about World Trade Center number 7? Nothing hit that building and yet it collapsed! So explain that and I'll believe the "official story".



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 05:03 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


Air pressure?

Whatever...



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 05:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


Air pressure?

Whatever...


Why not air pressure?



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 05:10 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 

Because the top was blown off for one, and everything was wide open and breaking apart (blowing up is more like it) and because those aren't puffs of smoke, but rapidly ejected jets of building material ie: cement, well below the threshold of destruction, and no "pancaking" is observed, everything was just blown out, very explosively, leaving little more than mere atmiosphere in the wake of the descending fountain of ejected material.

It's explained in the video.

Sorry I've taken this off topic into yet another useless debate, about what is imho, plainly obvious.

To each his own, as everyone is entitled to believe whatever they like I guess.



[edit on 24-9-2009 by OmegaPoint]



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 05:13 PM
link   
reply to post by OmegaPoint
 


Ok I guess we can just agree to disagree. What I see is the floors pancacking while the outer skin peels off from the structure.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 05:14 PM
link   
cover up,lie,BS whatever you wana call it but defo NOT the truth!! the truths coming anyways only a matter of time.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 05:17 PM
link   
[edit on 25-9-2009 by Nassim Haramein]



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 05:22 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


And if the explosive destruction is the correct interpretation and assessment, what then..? HDNB..? How would it make you feel to discover that you defend an abominable lie, and a monstrous crime against humanity of far reaching proportions, would that disturb you at all? Just curious if you've considered the full implications of what resides on either side of your interpretation, what you say you see there in that video.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 05:25 PM
link   
reply to post by OmegaPoint
 


Well I would believe it if someone could prove it to me. I am not defending anything, I am just stating my opinion, which you asked for. So i wouldnt feel bad either way as it is just my opinion from viewing both sides of the story.

How would you feel if you found out that it was just a bunch of crazy terrorists and your government is working its ass off to keep you safe from it happening again?

[edit on 24-9-2009 by HotDogNoBun]



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


After looking at ALL the evidence, I've concluded otherwise HDNB.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 05:37 PM
link   
reply to post by OmegaPoint
 


Well I respect your right to interpret things as you see fit, so as I said before we will have to agree to disagree.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 06:43 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


Of course, but only one of us, in our evaluation of the evidence, can be right, and who's evaluation may be considered based in reality.

And furthermore, I would go so far as to say that the evidence, when evaluated in totality is far from indeterminate.

So for the record, I have to say that I think you've been duped into accepting and supporting a barabaric and treasonous lie and have been unwittingly corrupted by it.

Another interesting observation that I've made, and I'm not suggesting a global conspiracy by the freemasons, neccessarily, but it appears to me, in almost every case, that masons are wholehearted and staunch defenders of the official story. Would you have any idea why that might be? It's just seems strange to me, since awareness and level-headedness, in light of all information ought to enable a good man to see through such a blatant deception.. it's just curious.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 06:47 PM
link   
reply to post by OmegaPoint
 


So you ask our opinions on the official story and then if we disagree with you we must be wrong and have been decieved. Why cant you just accept that I believe the official story more or less?



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 07:03 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


The implications are just as serious the other way, in terms of bearing false witness.

All I'm saying is this - one view is wrong, and other is correct, in reality, and then sure, I'm going so far as to suggest that the cumulative weight of all evidence points in one and only one direction, while making another observation about how certain groups who've been indoctrinated into a certain type of power structure, all seem to be strongly united in alignment with the OS, and I just find that odd, even from a purely pschological or spiritual perspective.

It's just a very serious issue, and very contentious. And there's just so much APATHY out there.

Forgive me I'm just frustrated, but I'm entitled also to my opinion too, and in my opinion you've been hoodwinked, perhaps in more ways than one.



posted on Sep, 24 2009 @ 07:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
reply to post by OmegaPoint
 


Thanks I have actually seen that before, but I watched it again. Those "explosions" can simply be explained by air pressure escaping through the weakest windows it can find. When something pancakes like that, it compresses the air in the elevator shafts, etc, which then escapes through the weakest windows in the floors below.


A few pointers to debunk the whole *Air Squib* myth, here we have the commencement of WTC2 collapse in ultra slow motion.


(click to open player in new window)


1). Explain the abundance of squibs seen prior to any floors pancaking.

2). The flashes seen all around the story that is separating the 34 storeys above it.

3). How is air compressing around these levels with the enormous holes in the North, South, and Eastern faces of WTC2 caused by the plane and the 3 gigantic explosions?, this building around the levels it is collapsing is anything but air tight.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join