It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
But tell me, is homosexuality equally okay as heterosexuality?
Originally posted by neformore
Simple questions require a simple answer. I see no difference to differentiate between the two, so....
Yes.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
This is a hypothesis, doesn't have to be likely to happen or not.
Being gay isn't about having sex with people. It is about loving people.
Originally posted by Wildbob77
First, I would accept my children regardless of the sexual orientation.
BUT, when a child is 12 they should be engaged in school, sports, music, art etc. They should not be focused on sexual orientation.
When I was 12, I knew the facts of life but I'm not really sure that I believed them.
I say give kids the time to be kids. We need to slow down societies desire to sexualize children and let them grow up first.
It's probably like being homosexual doesn't mean you're gonna enjoy a sexual relationship with every person of the same sex you know.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
reply to post by BiohazardsBack
Please help me to understand this:
Being gay isn't about having sex with people. It is about loving people.
You see, homosexuality as I understand it is about preferring sexual relations with a member of the same gender. As far as loving someone of the same gender, that is IMO completely normal. I loved my father; we are (well, were) both male. I love several of my close friends; we are all males. I am sure if I had a brother, I would love him, even though we were both males. The difference is that I would have absolutely no sexual interest in any of these people.
'Love' does not equal 'sex'. Love is a deep emotion; sex is an act of reproduction (or facsimile thereof; a mating).
So exactly when did simply loving someone define one's sexuality? I missed that memo...
TheRedneck
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
What is happening to our society is we are unable to be honest with ourselves and society itself.
It is actually about prefering fulfilling relationships with the same sex, not just having sex.
Do you divorce your wife when she becomes barren, because "it is unnatural" to have sex without a possibility of reproduction?
Is being sterile or hitting menopause disgusting because "if 100% of the population is sterile, the world will end"?
Should we shun those who choose to remain in relationships despite the complete inability to procreate due to an illness, or simply age?
I know people who have been sterile their entire life. They are teens/early 20s. Should they be banned from having a relationship just because they cannot make a child?
I am just saying, having a relationship does not mean you are "sorrupting the young children with sex"
Because gay kids don't develop sexual interests sooner than straight kids. They just generate more controversy because it is "abnormal".
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to post by neformore
bah
that's just realizing that your wrong and not wanting to answer the question
and even IF i agree with you about your argument on absolutes, your argument STILL hides behind the hope of remaining in the lower denominator.