How do you know if we have not averted several more attacks on US soil by what Bush has done?
As people have answered, It would be a bonus in his pocket to claim that what he has put in place is working, and he should be re-elected. There has
not been one, not one!!!, declaration by this administration that an attack on US soil has been thwarted. The DHS, does not even let the public know
about situations till a month after the fact, ie- suitcases at Penn Station NY, Missing tanker in NJ, Missing Fuel Rods at Yankee Nuclear Plant in
Vermont, the 4 mysterious divers in Florida, New York, and Hawaii, the list goes on.
Bush - hes not perfect by a long shot, we still have a bloated government that spends to much money but one thing about him is that he has
principles and sticks with them.
Nobodys perfect. What he is doing has been under false pretenses. He has created more hatred towards the US with his actions. This is opening the
window up for more terror against the US and intrests abroad. His principals have run this country into the ground. I give him credit for sticking to
them, unlike Kerry's constant changing, but not at the expense of the citizens of The United States.
On the other hand, I have not yet decided what I'll do when the election happens.
I don't want Bush, and I really don't want Kerry.
You bring up a really intresting scenerio. This has to be the worst selection of canidates ever, or at least in my time (29 yrs old). I cant stand
Bush, yet Kerry is a dimwit.
Very Out There Hypothetical: What if Nader Wins?
What if everone is like screw this and votes for Nader?
Either way things do not look good going into 2005.