It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I LOVE you man! I really do...in a non-sexual way.
This is the first I've learned of this thanks to your careful analysis of
You NEED to get this out there with your name on it. You have totally
debunked the GL's lies and excuses for claiming this 'object' was AA77!!
May I have your permission to spread this elsewhere?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Good grief, the plane hit in the middle of rush hour traffic and hordes of eyewitnesses specifically saw it was a jet liner...and yet these conspiracy people just have to continue relying on blurry images in the hopes it was a cruise missile, UFO, or whatever it is they think actually hit the Pentagon. It's as if you WANT it all to be some secret conspiracy.
Did it ever occur to you that it's a documented fact that the conspirators (whoever you think they are) actaully had one or more disposable jet liners under their control? They wouldn't need to crash some weird thing into the Pentagon and then plant all sorts of fake aircraft wreckage all over the place and hire armies of disinformation agents to get people to believe it was a jet liner. All they'd need to do is send a real jet liner into the Pentagon and all those things would be created for real.
Just claim it was a real jet liner but it was under remote control, or something. That way, you can still keep your conspiracy stories and not have to add all this extra complexity of layers upon layers of elaborate conspiracies within conspiracies on top of conspiracies. Why are you striving to make it as convoluted as possible?
Originally posted by talisman
Well the UNited States Gov could easily settle this. They can put up or shut up. Lets see the Video.
Obviously they don't want to actually show what happened for a reason.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Why does every tiny little nut and bolt just HAVE to have some sinister secret meaning to it? Even Freud said that sometime a cigar is just a cigar.
Originally posted by CosmicEgg
I guess a little coffee wouldn't help you wake up? No? I thought not. But sometimes, you get coffee even when you don't want it. Sometimes the pot is full and you just can't do anything about it. This is one of those occasions. There are a lot of people awake now, Dave. Your little world is going to fall apart, like it or not. Hold on for the ride. I hope your "plane" has wings at least and some decent momentum to keep up with what's coming up next. This is gonna be fun.
Originally posted by Seventh
How did a vehicle travelling at over 600 feet per seconds manage to remain stationary for 3.5 seconds?, and in this time the explosion also appeared.
I'd have thought the answer would be self evident- becuase the video you're using is so blurry and out of focus, the object you're pointing to in the video is either a stationary object in the background behind the aircraft in one frame and revealed in the next frame, OR, that really wasn't the aircraft you were pointing at to begin with. I'm sure there are more legitimate possibilities I haven't thought of, but I'll wager they're all based upon the impracticality of interpreting a video that's so blurry and out of focus, in one way or another.
So what say you explain to me, why on EARTH woudl they waste their time crashing some weird thing into the Pentagon and plant all sorts of fake wreckage all over the place and hire hordes of disinformation agents to get us to believe it was a jet liner, and not just send a real jet liner into the Pentagon like they did the WTC towers (under remote control or otherwise)? It seems to me that you're a kissing cousin to the "no planers" conspiracy people becuase you're pointing at blurry images and yelling FAKE just like they are. The only difference is that they're bucking against a lot more images.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Just for the record, what you're pointing to as "Object" is not the plane, but white smoke behind the plane. I've zoomed and overlayed a 757 where the plane is in the image:
The plane is there in both videos released from the DoD. Now the ultimate question is, is the plane real, or is it some other type besides a 757, but painted to look like AA. Either way, there is a plane in both DoD videos, real or not.
Originally posted by 12m8keall2c
Not to rain on any parades here, BUT ... what you are "seeing" is merely residual "after-effects" and "latency" resulting from the camera's lens "refresh rate".
Nothing more ... lingering "after-effects", at that frame-rate.