It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NASA is protecting its budget and will make numerous announcements in order to prevent President Obama subjecting them to a significantly reduced budget.
NASA does not want China to be the first nation to return to the Moon.
Originally posted by Enigma Publius
edit to add: also i have looked at moon pictures several times in the past...dozens of times; and NEVER has it been so easy to find color pictures like the ones we see now! it's like as soon as India released this, the floodgates open up and they can deny anything by saying it's been there all along. Maybe it was, but it was NEVER so easy to find. I have looked MANY times, and only today have i seen color pictures of the moon being anything except grey. What gives, i know i'm not the only guy here who is not an expert on this, so i want to hear if anyone else feels as though our ideas of the moon publicly have literally changed overnight.
Just giving some Ideas, If back then since the Gemini space program
in the 60'th they were able to take a picture of Earth in full colour,
as well goes to the Apollo programs which they were able to take
a picture of our Earth, in full clear colour from a very far distance,
even form the moon surface you can see the Earth's clear colour.
It shows that they already have the technology for taking good pictures.
So, With the same camera, why is it that they can not take just a picture
of the moon that atleast that shows some colour, acthually there are no
colour picture's of the moon with atleast some colour at all in the old days,
back then, for us, the moon will be given infomation to us to
believe that it is just a grey dead piece of rock,
not untill lately, I'll guess since 2000 we just begin
to see picture's of the moon with colour,
regards to other nations space programs.
Originally posted by heineken
reply to post by BlackRosEmyth
Man...I am with you
i noticed in that posted colour moon picture..there is a lot of GREEN too...am i wrong?
Originally posted by OWoutcast
reply to post by BlackRosEmyth
Just giving some Ideas, If back then since the Gemini space program
in the 60'th they were able to take a picture of Earth in full colour,
as well goes to the Apollo programs which they were able to take
a picture of our Earth, in full clear colour from a very far distance,
even form the moon surface you can see the Earth's clear colour.
It shows that they already have the technology for taking good pictures.
So, With the same camera, why is it that they can not take just a picture
of the moon that atleast that shows some colour, acthually there are no
colour picture's of the moon with atleast some colour at all in the old days,
back then, for us, the moon will be given infomation to us to
believe that it is just a grey dead piece of rock,
not untill lately, I'll guess since 2000 we just begin
to see picture's of the moon with colour,
regards to other nations space programs.
Size can also be a factor if you use the taking pictures from a distance. Earth is much bigger then the moon so taking pictures from the moon of earth would show more detail then taking pictures from earth of the moon. Also if you look at the pictures of earth fromt he moon you see a little bit of Brown or red but the two colors that take presidence are Blue and white. That is because the oceans and water make up the majority of are planet so Blues will come out very easily when taking a picture of earth. The whites come out due to are atmosphere and the creation of clouds. the little bit of red or browns you may be able to spot are land masses. Yet from the pictures I have seen I can't see any green on the pictures of earth nor can i make out what land masses might be showing.
The old pictures from the moon to earth give color but honestly Not that great of detail. I'm sure if we went there now and took a picture we would get more exstrodinary detail then we did then. That we would be able to make out the land masses allot better. So I still believe tech was the issue not that they where hiding the colors from us. I mean go look at some of the newer pictures of Mars you see allot more blue then you use to.
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Related......
Too bad they recently aborted the mission after losing contact. Apparently not before they were able to gather significant data.
Aug. 31 (Bloomberg) -- India’s space agency ended an $82 million mission to map the surface of the moon after failing to restore contact with its unmanned Chandrayaan I craft.....Contact was lost with the probe two days ago and scientists at the Indian Space Research Organisation were unable to restore communications,
We are disappointed with the development, but have managed to get a large volume of data,” including 70,000 images of the moon
www.bloomberg.com...
The moon is not the dry, dull place it seems. Traces of water lurk in the dirt unseen.
Three different space probes found the chemical signature of water all over the moon's surface, surprising the scientists who doubted the unexpected measurement until it was confirmed independently and repeatedly.
It is not enough moisture to foster homegrown life on the moon. But if processed in mass quantities, it might provide resources — drinking water and rocket fuel — for future moon-dwellers, scientists said. The water comes and goes during the lunar day.
It is not a lot of water. In a two-litre soda bottle of lunar dirt, there probably would be a medicine dropper full of water, said University of Maryland astronomer Jessica Sunshine, one of the scientists who discovered the water. Another way to think of it is that a drink of water would require 730 square metres of dirt to produce, said team leader Carle Pieters of Brown University.
"It's sort of just sticking on the surface," Sunshine said. "We always think of the moon as dead, and this is sort of a dynamic process that's going on."
The discovery, with three studies bring published in the journal Science on Thursday and a NASA briefing, could refocus interest in the moon. The appeal of the moon waned after astronauts visited 40 years ago and called it "magnificent desolation."