Forced H1N1 Vaccination is Terrorist Act of WAR, page 8

I've worked at a hospital for about six years now and have often wondered what I would do if vaccination would become mandatory for the regular seasonal flu. For the past couple of years I've signed the waiver form saying I refuse to take the flu shot (before there was no waiver that needed to be signed, I just didn't get the shot). When I was originally hired I was required to be tested for immunity and get any vaccinations for what I wasn't immune to and so it turned out I didn't show immunity to measles, I think it was, so I had to get the full MMR shot which I wasn't too happy about but I was in debt at the time and needed the job so I went ahead and got it. Now fast forward some years and now there is this swine flu. Fortunately since I started this job I've lived frugally and saved well and given I have no children and living alone I could live off of my savings for years without a job and so if the swine flu vaccination were to become mandatory it would become an easy call for me as I would just leave the job, but not without at least trying some evasive maneuvers first.

Here's what I've thought of for a couple ideas for vaccine avoidance. But keep in mind they're only ideas for which I have not tested, nor have I heard of anyone else trying, therefore I have barely more than a clue about whether these ideas would have any chance at success.

First, one could go to one's physician and tell the doctor that every time one has eaten an egg, and only an egg with no condiments or even salt, oil, butter, onions or mushrooms added one has had an allergic reaction shortly after eating the egg. The doctor may then be able to clinically determine that the patient has an allergy to eggs and be willing to document that as so.

I don't know if a patient giving such a history would be sufficient for a doctor to document the allergy as such but after working in hospital myself for so many years I've come to the conclusion that the people making the rules in hospitals, the same sorts of people who stress the importance of vaccines, are very afraid of allergies and the litigious danger that goes along with exposing or administering drugs that a patient is allergic too. Therefore I think that in an abundance of caution, a physician, in his or her own interest may want to readily document a patient as having a given allergy even if there is a low level of certainty in the diagnosis. That is, from the doctors perspective giving a wrong diagnosis as being positive for an allergy is not endangering the patient (it's not like the patient faces harm for not eating eggs) but giving the wrong diagnosis of being negative for an allergy posses great danger for the patient and therefore the physician for malpractice.

If by chance one were to be less than truthful with their doctor regarding an allergic reaction to eggs, it would probably be in the patient's best interest not to reveal the dishonesty to anyone. However if successful one could simply communicate to coworkers what exactly one said to one's doctor and what kind of documentation resulted from that conversation with one's physician and how that related to not getting vaccinated. Hopefully one's coworkers would catch on and the next thing you know a perplexing epidemic of egg allergies would emerge among workers in the health care industry.

Second Idea:

While I've refused the season flu vaccine I've gotten my annual mantoux skin test for TB and even with that I've had to sign a consent first. That made me think; I thought this was a mandatory test, why do I have to consent to do something that is mandatory? Suppose one were to verbally agree to have the shot but refuse to sign the consent to have the shot. In that case the nurse administering the shot would refuse to give you the shot and one could say I didn't refuse the shot, they refused to give the shot to me. I don't know if this would be a loophole with any chance of success but as a last resort might be worth a try.