Originally posted by ngchunter
Actually the readings are stronger further away because water vapor is not nearly as massive as dust particles and is not as easily bound by the
comet's loose gravity.
Of course there's no proof of that, it's an excuse. In fact it's quite ridiculous.
And entirely different from your last excuse If I recall. 
And the fact that most of the comet surfaces that have been viewed have been bone dry, no where near enough water has been detected on the surface to
account for the OH readings. Oh that's right it's beneath the surface. 
See the pattern? they tuck things away that can't be observed or measured just like your gravity explanation that defies logic.
And that's what it is OH not H20, for over 50 years they have assumed that OH must be the remnant of H2O broken down by photolysis. Well guess what?
there's another process. H20 is not needed.
You ridiculed me about OH creation with the solar wind, now it's confirmed.
I thought you'd be back for a stab. Although a lame one.
I agree kinetic impact cannot account for it, your missing the entire point once again.
I know how pre conditioned you are so I won't be arguing with any brick walls here thanks.
[edit on 16-10-2009 by squiz]
|
Yikes... Good thing I'm off the sea. Nasa is retarded. Our moon is sooo
important!! Tides, Womens cycles, Sea creatures mate and travel by the light of the moon at night. Countless others i'm sure. All civalisations who
have a moon god must be pissed. Off to bed. Go back to the boat in the morning for gear work. 
