It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DreamerOracle
Slayer I must say a fantastic read, a more detailed account of what I firmly believe in myself on the actual date of human developement....which always leads me to the same question
Why after all of these actual facts we are unveiling, which conflict with the perceived modern day archeologist version of history, do they insist with the lie?
I mean why?
Whats the point?
Why not just admit, "hey we may be wrong, organised civilisation could indeed have come during and even well before the last ice age".........I just don't get it, it feeds the, "they know but they're hiding it because everyone will realise something amazing about humans we shouldn't know, theory" amongst the many others out there......Aliens, Gods etc etc. Setting aside my own beliefs, what do you think is the reasoning in the blanket denial?
S+F btw ....best post for me this year and last well done.
p.s Check out google maps off the west coast of Africa alot of anomalies very big structures if not camera glitches....Beyond The Pillars Of Hercules???.......
This portion of the sea floor is covered in structure outlines and roads....take the Islands around the structure in the picture they almost follow a giant circle just theres some missing maybe?
edit on 13-9-2010 by DreamerOracle because: more editing
Originally posted by Gazrok
The thing that always struck me about Plato's account though, is the fact that he kept stating it was a factual account.
I still think (personally) the Altiplano region of Bolivia seems a perfect fit for the ancient city, but I do have to applaud the effort and research that went into your original post and followups.