It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HennyPen
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Orion7911
I would love to know who the passer by was - but I don't and probably never will.
You still don't get it do you? Of course it will never happen.
The Satam al Suqami passport charade is bogus. The passerby does not exist. He will never exist. Satam al Suqami was not on the aircraft.
The FBI created a tale (the grid search) which was official for over a year and then a lawyer for the 911 Commission decided that the tale (the grid search) was too suspicious, which it was, and changed it to an anonymous 'passerby' found the passport on the streets below and handed it to a NYPD detective who handed it over to the FBI without bothering to do a detectives's job, which was to maintain the chain of evidence, by obtaining the anonymous 'passerby's' name and identity, and a full description on a police report of the location and circumstances of the passport discovery.
This is what police officers do in most cities. What makes the passport more suspicious is that it could somehow survive undamaged in any manner in the pocket or luggage of a hijacker who most likely has a stolen identity, inside the crushing fuselage of an exploding fireball aircraft inside the 97th floor of the North Tower. This paper passport also had to pass somehow through the massive core structure of the North Tower and make it outside the south side of the North Tower, and miraculously sail itself against the wind 500 or 600 feet to the north to be found near Vesey Street, according to the original FBI official report.
Not bloody likely.
Paper passport
Passport cover
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by HennyPen
The FBI created a tale (the grid search) which was official for over a year and then a lawyer for the 911 Commission decided that the tale (the grid search) was too suspicious, which it was, and changed it to an anonymous 'passerby' found the passport on the streets below and handed it to a NYPD detective who handed it over to the FBI
1. The story changed.
Originally posted by HennyPen
without bothering to do a detectives's job, which was to maintain the chain of evidence, by obtaining the anonymous 'passerby's' name and identity, and a full description on a police report of the location and circumstances of the passport discovery.
2. Someone can provide evidence for something like 9/11 completely anonymously?
Originally posted by hooper
Where exactly did the "story" change? Or are you reading things into the statements that really aren't there.
Originally posted by HennyPen
The FBI created a tale (the grid search) which was official for over a year and then a lawyer for the 911 Commission decided that the tale (the grid search) was too suspicious, which it was, and changed it to an anonymous 'passerby' found the passport on the streets below and handed it to a NYPD detective who handed it over to the FBI without bothering to do a detectives's job, which was to maintain the chain of evidence, by obtaining the anonymous 'passerby's' name and identity, and a full description on a police report of the location and circumstances of the passport discovery.
Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.
Without much of a scratch........
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
"You can sqawk about north of Vessey Street, south of Vessey street, windspeeds, weather, etc. all you want. You can choose to dismiss the whole thing if that is what is most satisfying to you. But that is all there is. Lower order of probability - yes. Impossible - no."
Yeah, you're right, no need to "squawk" over how a very key piece of evidence was obtained on that day. No need to squawk over the bozo investigation of the whole 911 incident. No need to "squawk" over insignificant investigative details because they just insert doubts into people's minds about the garbage they have been fed.
Let's just all believe some story which has a "low order of probability" because the people who gave us this information are the same people who bungled the investigation from the very beginning. Gee, what a wonderful world this is where we can all make up some "low probability" statements without having to back them with a proper investigation and supporting evidence.
Why "squawk" when you can just sit on your fat lazy behind and believe what you are being told by people whose credibility and identity is unknown?
posted by SphinxMontreal
"You can sqawk about north of Vessey Street, south of Vessey street, windspeeds, weather, etc. all you want. You can choose to dismiss the whole thing if that is what is most satisfying to you. But that is all there is. Lower order of probability - yes. Impossible - no."
Yeah, you're right, no need to "squawk" over how a very key piece of evidence was obtained on that day. No need to squawk over the bozo investigation of the whole 911 incident. No need to "squawk" over insignificant investigative details because they just insert doubts into people's minds about the garbage they have been fed.
Let's just all believe some story which has a "low order of probability" because the people who gave us this information are the same people who bungled the investigation from the very beginning. Gee, what a wonderful world this is where we can all make up some "low probability" statements without having to back them with a proper investigation and supporting evidence.
Why "squawk" when you can just sit on your fat lazy behind and believe what you are being told by people whose credibility and identity is unknown?
posted by hooper
So what exactly do you want to do and what are you doing about it? Have you ever tried to contact the NYPD detective that was given the passport? Have you contacted the FBI and requested clarification on the grid search data and dates? Or are you content to just call everyone a liar and walk away?
Originally posted by IrnBruFiend
Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.
Without much of a scratch........
The Official Story once again takes another quantum leap in logic.
It's hysterical people are even attempting to debunk this one.
posted by hooper
reply to post by Orion7911
I would love to know who the passer by was - but I don't and probably never will.
posted by HennyPen
You still don't get it do you? Of course it will never happen.
The Satam al Suqami passport charade is bogus. The passerby does not exist. He will never exist. Satam al Suqami was not on the aircraft.
The FBI created a tale (the grid search) which was official for over a year and then a lawyer for the 911 Commission decided that the tale (the grid search) was too suspicious, which it was, and changed it to an anonymous 'passerby' found the passport on the streets below and handed it to a NYPD detective who handed it over to the FBI without bothering to do a detectives's job, which was to maintain the chain of evidence, by obtaining the anonymous 'passerby's' name and identity, and a full description on a police report of the location and circumstances of the passport discovery.
This is what police officers do in most cities. What makes the passport more suspicious is that it could somehow survive undamaged in any manner in the pocket or luggage of a hijacker who most likely has a stolen identity, inside the crushing fuselage of an exploding fireball aircraft inside the 97th floor of the North Tower. This paper passport also had to pass somehow through the massive core structure of the North Tower and make it outside the south side of the North Tower, and miraculously sail itself against the wind 500 or 600 feet to the north to be found near Vesey Street, according to the original FBI official report.
Not bloody likely.
Paper passport
Passport cover
When hijacker Satam Al Suqami’s passport was recovered on 9/11 on the street near the World Trade Center, it was “soaked in jet fuel.”
source