It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hundreds of worms that were part of an experiment aboard the doomed space shuttle Columbia have been found alive in debris recovered from the crash site, US space agency (Nasa) officials say.
Originally posted by hooper
Actually, the passport was not found in the rubble, it was found by an unidentified person and turned over to a NYPD detective a block or so from the WTC before the towers collapsed. Its in the 9/11 Commision Report.
It, like a lot of things, survived the crash and was found. You may not want to believe it, but that is strictly a matter of personal choice.
Originally posted by hooper
There is no scientific basis to declare the matter impossible.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by JPhish
it is possible to win the lottery, but it is impossible for a piece of paper to survive a blazing inferno. There is absolutely ZERO chance that the passport came from that plane.
Really? Then click on these links....
The first one, is a picture of a badly torn piece of paper from the notebook of Ilan Ramon.
The second one, links to a flight deck video of the Space Shuttle Columbia.
These items were among the items recovered from the wreckage of Columbia. They survived the fiery hell which consumed Columbia and her crew.
And you think the passport that was found in the wreckage of the airliner that hit the WTC is proof of the "inside job"
Pathetic
Originally posted by SPreston
posted by hooper
Prove it wrong by a means other than declaring everybody that works for the government in any capacity is a liar and a murderer. In fact, which is more likely - the passport survived and was found or everyone in all levels of government is capable of being a cold blooded murderer?
Since we are on the subject of the Satam al-Suqami paper passport allegedly found in the rubble of the WTC, let's stick to that subject ok?
There is only one person who needs to be accused of duplicity and that is the stranger (passer-by) who allegedly found the unblemished paper passport and allegedly handed it to a NYPD detective. Correct?
Can you guarantee that this person was not planting evidence?
Have you identified this passerby? No?
Neither has anybody else have they? So according to US legal jurisprudence; the trail of evidence and the trail of custody of this paper passport is suspect isn't it and disqualified as evidence in a US courtroom?
Can you prove differently?
There is good evidence that some of the alleged hijackers had stolen identities and therefore fake passports. Some have claimed to be alive. Not one hijacker from Flights 11 and 175 has been officially identified by DNA.
Therefore we have good reason to suspect the paper passport of Satam al-Suqami was planted, especially sence it was not damaged by the fireball it was allegedly inside, and especially since it was supposedly inside the pocket of a supposedly crushed man allegedly trapped inside the burning fuselage of an aircraft inside the fireball 96 floors above the street.
I do not accept such nonsense as this discovered passport. Why do you?
Originally posted by Kryties
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.
Without much of a scratch........
Actually, the passport was not found in the rubble, it was found by an unidentified person and turned over to a NYPD detective a block or so from the WTC before the towers collapsed. _javascript:bold()Its in the 9/11 Commision Report.
It, like a lot of things, survived the crash and was found. You may not want to believe it, but that is strictly a matter of personal choice. There is no scientific basis to declare the matter impossible.
Still doesn't explain why he was subsequently found to be alive and living and had been nowhere near NYC does it? Unless you are going to try and say that he also somehow managed to survive slamming himself into the side of the WTC?
Originally posted by JPhish
reply to post by hooper
hate to break it to you, but a piece of paper surviving an explosion like the one at the trade centers is physically impossible. The passport was, like everything else on 9-11, planted evidence.
Originally posted by john124
Originally posted by Hazelnut
Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.
Without much of a scratch........
...and some foreign country hit duplicate lottery numbers in consecutive drawings a couple days ago.
Thus proving that low probability random events, such as consecutive lottery draws and passports surviving, does occassionally happen.
false analogy
It is possible to win the lottery, but it is impossible for a piece of paper to survive a blazing inferno. There is absolutely ZERO chance that the passport came from that plane.
[edit on 9/22/2009 by JPhish]