You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.

Without much of a scratch........

What's this story?

Do you have a link to a news item or something, as I'm unaware of any passport...

Thanks

You forgot to add

.....through an explosion hot enough to apparently bring steel to melting point.

They will probably try to explain it the same way I was told to explain the lack of video evidence clearly showing a jet airliner slamming into the Pentagon: that we have an error in our thinking and that we must only think about the evidence collected that apparently proves the official story - and that we should discard such "ridiculous" evidence as a passport surviving a jet fuel explosion and building collapse, or more than 5 frames of footage from the military centre of America....

[edit on 22/9/2009 by Kryties]

Also not forgetting the guy who the actual passport picture belongs to lives somewhere in N.America, and wasn't even anywhere near a airport, plane, NYC that day.

If 11 of the 13 "Hijackers" were confirmed by the CIA to actually be alive after a intern report, but not publically published, it does raise suspicions as to who actually was on the planes that day.

Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.

Without much of a scratch........

Actually, the passport was not found in the rubble, it was found by an unidentified person and turned over to a NYPD detective a block or so from the WTC before the towers collapsed. Its in the 9/11 Commision Report.

It, like a lot of things, survived the crash and was found. You may not want to believe it, but that is strictly a matter of personal choice. There is no scientific basis to declare the matter impossible.

Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.

Without much of a scratch........

I'm neutral, nobody has proven anything on either side as far as i'm concerned but lets get one thing clear, it is for he with the allegation to make to prove it.

So you prove what you believe.

posted by hooper

It, like a lot of things, survived the crash and was found. You may not want to believe it, but that is strictly a matter of personal choice. There is no scientific basis to declare the matter impossible.

And there we have a testimony of FAITH from a devoted believer.

Right on schedule.

Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.

Without much of a scratch........

...and some foreign country hit duplicate lottery numbers in consecutive drawings a couple days ago.

That passport can be explained by a million theories but only one is correct. Plant.

Originally posted by hooper

Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.

Without much of a scratch........

Actually, the passport was not found in the rubble, it was found by an unidentified person and turned over to a NYPD detective a block or so from the WTC before the towers collapsed. _javascript:bold()Its in the 9/11 Commision Report.

It, like a lot of things, survived the crash and was found. You may not want to believe it, but that is strictly a matter of personal choice. There is no scientific basis to declare the matter impossible.

Still doesn't explain why he was subsequently found to be alive and living and had been nowhere near NYC does it? Unless you are going to try and say that he also somehow managed to survive slamming himself into the side of the WTC?

Originally posted by SPreston

posted by hooper

It, like a lot of things, survived the crash and was found. You may not want to believe it, but that is strictly a matter of personal choice. There is no scientific basis to declare the matter impossible.

And there we have a testimony of FAITH from a devoted believer.

Right on schedule.

Prove it wrong by a means other than declaring everybody that works for the government in any capacity is a liar and a murderer. In fact, which is more likely - the passport survived and was found or everyone in all levels of government is capable of being a cold blooded murderer?

Originally posted by Hazelnut

Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.

Without much of a scratch........

...and some foreign country hit duplicate lottery numbers in consecutive drawings a couple days ago.

That passport can be explained by a million theories but only one is correct. Plant.

And you know this how?

Originally posted by Hazelnut

Originally posted by Redneck from Hell
You know the one that was found in the rubble, that flew out of the terrorist dude's pocket from inside the plane.

Without much of a scratch........

...and some foreign country hit duplicate lottery numbers in consecutive drawings a couple days ago.

Thus proving that low probability random events, such as consecutive lottery draws and passports surviving, does occassionally happen.

[edit on 22-9-2009 by john124]

posted by hooper

Prove it wrong by a means other than declaring everybody that works for the government in any capacity is a liar and a murderer. In fact, which is more likely - the passport survived and was found or everyone in all levels of government is capable of being a cold blooded murderer?

Since we are on the subject of the Satam al-Suqami paper passport allegedly found in the rubble of the WTC, let's stick to that subject ok?

There is only one person who needs to be accused of duplicity and that is the stranger (passer-by) who allegedly found the unblemished paper passport and allegedly handed it to a NYPD detective. Correct?

Can you guarantee that this person was not planting evidence?

Have you identified this passerby? No?

Neither has anybody else have they? So according to US legal jurisprudence; the trail of evidence and the trail of custody of this paper passport is suspect isn't it and disqualified as evidence in a US courtroom?

Can you prove differently?

There is good evidence that some of the alleged hijackers had stolen identities and therefore fake passports. Some have claimed to be alive. Not one hijacker from Flights 11 and 175 has been officially identified by DNA.

Therefore we have good reason to suspect the paper passport of Satam al-Suqami was planted, especially sence it was not damaged by the fireball it was allegedly inside, and especially since it was supposedly inside the pocket of a supposedly crushed man allegedly trapped inside the burning fuselage of an aircraft inside the fireball 96 floors above the street.

I do not accept such nonsense as this discovered passport. Why do you?