Before you reply to JUST the title, please read the entire OP!
We have all heard the plans of the Global Elite. %90 percent reduction in the world's population. Now obviously this could only come about through a
mass slaughter, catastrophe or some other barbaric NWO plan that will not be pleasant.
But if there was a way to reduce the population of the world slowly, but over time to a manageable level would you agree?
Okay, this is where someone comes out and says we could all fit in Australia so there isn't a problem, we just need to get on. Clearly this is
desirable, but obviously impossible. Humans are social beings who live in hamlets, villages, towns cities and mega cities, we can't all just grab a
plot of useless land and hope for the best. We need natural resources, water, food, air and quality of life to enrich our own lives and not cause too
much of an impact on the natural world.
If there was a way to depopulate the world, slowly but surely, safely and above all OPENLY, would you agree?
Would you agree to a one child policy? Is it feasible, effective and above all fair?
Would it take so long to make an impact on the population of the world that it wouldn't be worth it?
China's one child policy
was introduced in 1979. it has been 'credited' ( I use that term
very loosely) with preventing more than 250 million births from its implementation to 2000. The graph below does show a decreased rate of population
growth since 1979.
A complete coincidence, I was looking for an article about baby girls being unwanted in China, I came across this article TODAY!
One-child China is a success, says
Labour aide Adair Turner
China's one- child policy - which has resulted in forced abortions, infanticide and compulsory sterilisation - has had a 'positive impact' on
the country's economic performance, one of Labour's leading advisers says today.
Lord Turner, head of the Financial Services Authority, claims the laws on family size played a crucial role in China's economic take-off and allowed
the country to develop without 'severe political and social tensions'.
But human rights campaigners criticised Lord Turner for appearing to support the draconian laws, claiming they had led to untold misery for women and
But it highlights some of the problems:
"which has resulted in forced abortions, infanticide and compulsory sterilisation"
Would this really happen if it was implemented in Western Nations? Is it the nature of Chinese society putting so much on the continuation of the
family line that has caused these issues to be so prevalent?
The real question is this - As we approach this uncertain time of Swine Flu and its vaccine, wars and the NWO threats of depopulation, would it be
wiser to accept this OPEN and gradual form of depopulation, rather than succumb to an apocalyptic scenario of disease and war?
We'd all (myself included) like to believe that when the time comes we will fight the good fight and stick it to them, but is this realistic and even
possible? Would it be better to and turn the tide of our bulging population voluntarily now rather than have it force on us through disease and mass
These are just thoughts my dear ATSers, don't lynch me as usual, I'm asking the question, not stating how it should be!
[edit on 22-9-2009 by kiwifoot]