Originally posted by pavil
I think it's more of a case of people bashing the messenger and not paying attention to the message they are delivering.
You have to admit, GB is almost solely to thank/blame for Van Jones resigning. Please refute his evidence rather than pick on the personality. If you can't refute the evidence, then what does that mean?
He wouldn't be popular if he wasn't striking a chord with a lot of viewers.
striking a chord with viewers? really? dont recall it being so hard to manipulate the masses before when your podium and bullhorn is one of the largest media conglomerates. take oprah winfrey for instance! shes essentially a virtual dictator, people just living out their lives doing anything she tells them to! i mean my god, do remember how big of a deal it was when she endorsed obama!
listen im not saying that every word that comes out of personalities like olberman or beck are complete lies but its justed twisted truth to manipulate the masses!
i mean these guys are on (and i hate to say it) the same level as the daily or colbert report (though i find more the truth to be more frightening in their comedy routines).
You have to admit, GB is almost solely to thank/blame for Van Jones resigning.
you aren't actually serious are you? im sorry but if that is your honest belief im going to have to end this conversation.
even if it wasn't from alternative
media 
you know what your claim is humorously comparable to? 
fficial&q=van+jones+resignation&start=0&sa=N ...im really not seeing
anything strongly indicating "GB" as being "solely to thank" for the van jones resignation. 
