It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Have we been infiltrated? Do you like Glenn Beck?

page: 3
3
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 1 2009 @ 01:07 AM
link   


"LULZ! I SHRILL FOR THE LULZ!" -Glenn Beck*

[edit on 1-10-2009 by GenLo]




posted on Oct, 2 2009 @ 12:30 PM
link   
reply to post by GenLo
 


I listen to Glenn Beck on the radio just Like i listen to Mark Levin and Michael Savage and on occasion Rush Limbaugh. I prefer Mark Levin.



posted on Oct, 2 2009 @ 12:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by MissysWorld
I have watched all news sources for years, and having done that, I have come to the conclusion, thru my research of the facts, that Fox News is the most truthful news source. I have also determined thru fact checking, that Glenn Beck has done his homework, and that 99.9% of his research into Obama, Czars, Acorn, SEIU, Apollo, Ayers, and the rest, is, without a doubt the TRUTH.
It's time those non believers, wake the hell up, get your heads out of the clouds, put whats left of your thinking caps on, get a pencil and paper, turn puter on, do your own research..BAM...The truth will set you free



[edit on 22-9-2009 by MissysWorld]


I agree with this post. I used to watch Glenn was on CNN. I am surprised more people here at ATS do not like him...I may not agree with everything he says...but he is defintely a voice int he wilderness who is yelling wake up people the emperor has no clothes. I tivo beck and listen to him on the radio. He has always been there for Ron Paul too...which I appreciated so much last year.



posted on Oct, 2 2009 @ 02:51 PM
link   
reply to post by MissysWorld
 


I think everyone is missing something on 'fair and balanced' reporting.

When a news org takes an issue that 80% of Americans believe one way and 20% the other way, and then present a debate where it is 50/50 fair and balanced, and the talking head on the 20% side is the equivelant of a basher at a message forum, it warps the minds of people watching... people who are unaware that 80% already believe one way on the issue.

Do this over time with issues like 'should marijuanna be legalized,' and the true will of the American people is never carried out.



posted on Oct, 8 2009 @ 09:12 AM
link   
Sean Hannity jumps on the "I'm a libertarian" bandwagon

October 7, 5:07 PM
Salt Lake City Independent Examiner
Jenn Morrill


Didn't know Sean Hannity was a die-hard libertarian? Why, because he still faithfully supports the wars, loves the PATRIOT Act, thinks water-boarding isn't so bad, and says our military is too small?

Well, today on his radio show he tried to persuade a caller he was a libertarian, mostly just by repeating, "Look, I'm a libertarian, buddy" over and over. Not terribly convincing. Apparently, this isn't the first time he's said it either.

So two of the most listened to conservative talk show hosts have converted to libertarianism? First Glenn Beck, now Sean? There are still many skeptical about Beck and his true views, but it seems safe to say that there is no way Hannity is a libertarian. So why say it?

Glenn Beck's ratings have soared as of late, passing Hannity on Fox in popularity. Beck has actually been speaking out against the war, though, and of course, calling himself a libertarian all the while. Does Hannity think that by just saying the word, Glenn Beck viewers will tune in to his show, too? Some will no doubt say that this is further proof that Fox is trying to hi-jack the true liberty movement underway by placing neo-conservatives, cloaked as libertarians, at the head of the Tea Party movement. Still others will say Sean is attempting to alter the meaning of the word. Maybe he thinks it's okay to call himself that because on one maybe two issues he does actually agree with libertarians.

What do you think?

www.examiner.com... e-City-Independent-Examiner~y2009m10d7-Sean-Hannity-jumps-on-the

[edit on 8-10-2009 by GenLo]



posted on Oct, 8 2009 @ 09:30 AM
link   
I have been watching the news local, national and world, my time length? honestly doesn't matter, one takes a few stories to match up across the board to see they all have their own lil way to spin. I have come to the conclusion that all of them will tell you the truth masked inside a belief system of their producers and financial backers.... about the only real 98% truth you will get from a news station, is your local news, an thats about people who have been hurt or worse, your community events, sport scores and weather.

Everything else is subjected to fair and balanced news, within a boundary of guidelines set forth by a panel that judges what we can hear and how we hear it.

This has been a public service announcement, by the people who let you understand the world as you see it.

[edit on 8-10-2009 by 10001011]



posted on Oct, 8 2009 @ 09:38 AM
link   
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.


Glenn Beck's performance may not be the best (I find it annoying most of the time).....but he covers everything we talk about here. His rants are no different than many rants here.

Seriously, listen to the topics he goes on and on about, then come to ATS and see that most of what he says is said here.

At least he is talking about the things the other guy in MSM wont even touch.

Id say Glenn Beck would fit right in with ATS




As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.


[edit on October 8th 2009 by greeneyedleo]



posted on Oct, 8 2009 @ 09:40 AM
link   
reply to post by GenLo
 


I used to really like Glen Beck and saw him as one of those types who would expose deceit and the controversies the liberal MSM would bury.

What began to change my mind about him and realize he was a government shill is his nasty rants against Truthers and the family of 9/11 victims. It was horrid. I'm not a truther but can admit they have some good points the government tries at all costs to silence. His comments directed at the families of victims was inexcusable.

So that helped me open my eyes to examine Beck more closely. Then it was like a domino effect and I began to see things for what they are.

But I don't single him out. He's just like all the others who are put in place to spread a very calculated agenda. If I could give a piece of advice, watching any commentator should be done for 'entertainment purposes only.' Please don't get your news from someone's opinion. That goes for liberal and conservative commentators and media personalities.



posted on Oct, 8 2009 @ 10:02 AM
link   
Politics=Who's turn it is to # you next IMO!



posted on Oct, 8 2009 @ 10:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by MissysWorld
I have watched all news sources for years, and having done that, I have come to the conclusion, thru my research of the facts, that Fox News is the most truthful news source. I have also determined thru fact checking, that Glenn Beck has done his homework, and that 99.9% of his research into Obama, Czars, Acorn, SEIU, Apollo, Ayers, and the rest, is, without a doubt the TRUTH.
It's time those non believers, wake the hell up, get your heads out of the clouds, put whats left of your thinking caps on, get a pencil and paper, turn puter on, do your own research..BAM...The truth will set you free


I do agree with what you said about Beck telling the truth, BUT WHY? is it because HE CARE?!? NOT AT ALL! HE IS PART OF THE GAME, "Progress demands anarchy tempered by common sense" - Aleister Crowley, and guess what the name of Beck's new book is COMMON SENSE!!! on one of his shows he even gives out esoteric knowledge to people about murals in new york and the such... he wants you to wake up, he wants the anarchy....



posted on Oct, 8 2009 @ 10:35 AM
link   
I am going to speak up for Glenn Beck. He calls things as he sees them, and does his fact checking. If he makes a mistake, he takes the time to state on air that he made a mistake. What he and others like him do, is they get people to think and look, see what the government is doing. He always offers time on his show if a person who he is speaking about, wants to come on and speak, he gives them that time. He asks questions that many do not either want to answer or chooses not to. I have watched Beck for several years, but I also watch alot of the other news channels to see what is going on and out there. His questions are valid and should have answers, as they would give pause to think. Now I do not blindly follow what he says, I take what he states and if it is something that gives me pause, I take the time to start doing the fact checking. He even gives you the direction and places to look, and I do. Yes for a long time while Bush was in office he talked bad about the policies of President G. W. Bush. And Bush, instead of ignoring him, actually invited him to the White House for a talk, though the contents of that talks was not stated, but he turned around and put it into a context that the common man could understand and explain such to the people. He is not a journalist, but he does have alot of good ideas. What I believe about Beck is he has the right ideas, just does such in a politically inconvient way.



posted on Oct, 8 2009 @ 11:14 AM
link   
"Order out of chaos." Sound familiar to anyone? Exactly the reason you should stay away from a personality like Glenn Beck and exactly why I have my suspicions about Alex Jones. The NWO WANT VIOLENCE! They want the anarchy! If we start acting foolish in large numbers like they almost did at the G20 martial law would be out in the open! I say "in the open" because martial law is already here, its clandestine, they are never going to openly admit martial law because then the who world would react! Don't you get it!?

Right now they are actively trying to divide us! Trying to "wake up" people to what they want! *broken record* They're giving the masses a truth placebo! They are giving the masses the blue pill and telling them its a red one! What do you think happened to The Black Panthers!? What do you think happened to AIM!? You think they just fell apart!? NO! The FBI and the CIA played them like puppets and tore them apart from the inside and that is exactly what they are trying to do now! This time though, the media is their greater tool, they still have people on the inside but its the media that woos followers to a false awakening and then spreading the disinfo like a virus! We see them we know they're there, question is are you one of them and don't even know it?

"How can I be sure of myself? How can I fight back?"

TURN
OFF
YOUR
TELEVISION!

Turn off your #ing T.V.!!!!!! HELLO!? ARE YOU JUST WILLING ACCEPTING IGNORANCE!? REMEMBER HOW MANY INTERNATIONAL CONGLOMERATES OWN WHAT IS ALLOWED TO BE BROADCAST ON YOUR TELEVISION!? DO YOU!? ITS LESS THAN 10 I CAN TELL YOU THAT!

Have you forgot that your trusted television puts your brain into receptive mode!? Or do you just think you have strong will and mind, that zombies are just in movies, well I tell you what! You're a zombie every time you decide you want to sit down in front of that BOOB TUBE!

STOP BEING SO DAMN DAFT!

[edit on 8-10-2009 by GenLo]



posted on Oct, 8 2009 @ 11:32 AM
link   
The truth of the matter is Glen Beck is not and has never been a news reporter he has never investigated a news story or done any research on a news story. By definition Glen Beck is not even a news commentator ie (analyst).
Glen Beck's qualifications for his job are his likeability and his convincing ability to deliver what ever message Faux News and Rupert Murdock want the sheeple to believe.
Please remember it was Fox news that won a court case where the court ruled that, there are no laws, rules or regulations that the news must tell the truth.
This court ruling means that ALL tv and radio stations ,internet sources,newspapers and magazines DO NOT have to tell the truth EVER !



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 11:52 AM
link   
b

[edit on 15-10-2009 by Ragu23]



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 12:25 PM
link   
Ithink Beck and FOX are exposing the goverment and I believe what he says and we now Obama does not care for FOX at all.

I wonder why Obama doesn't like Beck oh its because he tells thier dirty little secrets they keep from us.

He's trying to wake this country up and to take it back from Tyrants, I trust him.

You can either watch the truth on FOX or the bs on MSNBC and this crazy ***** she lies about anything that can hurt the goverment and turns us patriots into terrorist.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 12:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Oldnslo
 




I started becoming "politically aware" since watching both political party's conventions since 1956 and absolutely so since November 22, 1963, when I saw 2 men in suits carrying a body bag from AF-1 to an awaiting twin rotor helo @ Andrews Air Force Base.


In response to your statement. They did not carry the Presidents body in a body bag by two men.

It was in a casket and a military honor guard carried it out.

Stop your sensational lies.

I like and watch Glenn Beck.

He is one of the few that speak the truth that most are to stupid to see.



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 01:14 PM
link   
reply to post by jd140
 


Its really hard not to choose Beck. He practices all manner of antics to place himself theatrically in a position to be the "talk of town". It's what he thrives on. Is that not obvious?



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 06:56 PM
link   
[/img]

Originally posted by calcoastseeker
reply to post by Oldnslo
 




I started becoming "politically aware" since watching both political party's conventions since 1956 and absolutely so since November 22, 1963, when I saw 2 men in suits carrying a body bag from AF-1 to an awaiting twin rotor helo @ Andrews Air Force Base.


In response to your statement. They did not carry the Presidents body in a body bag by two men.

It was in a casket and a military honor guard carried it out.

Stop your sensational lies.

I like and watch Glenn Beck.

He is one of the few that speak the truth that most are to stupid to see.


Sorry sir, I do not lie. I saw what I saw and only put forth the truth.

The incident is mentioned in David Lifton's book, Best Evidence. The 2 agents with the body bag were in a BIG hurry to get that bag on the helo which immediately departed. I was 15 and glued to the tube.

The news commentator at Andrews stated "they must be carrying the body of a Secret Service agent killed in Dallas today" It was never mentioned again. The big question is who was in the body bag as JFK and Tippitt were the only ones killed in Dallas that day. Only 2 possibilities and Secret Service weapons are not an option.

Watch the landing of AF-1, the entire sequence, to the sound of a large twin rotor helo to which the 2 men with the body were running to, before JFK's casket reaches the aircraft door. The helo took off immediately. I have posted my observation in other posts thoughout ATS regarding the assassination of JFK. I didn't just fall off the truck.

As far as I'm concerned, that piece of film was the "scoop" of the century and I have been a non-believer since day 1.

Believe what you want but there are many areas which go unexplained (unnoticed) and this is one of them.

Another is the .38 automatic casings found and initialed at the scene of the Tippitt murder, and un-recognized by the initialing officer at a Warren Commissions hearing. A Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested with a revolver, with a damaged firing pin in the Texas Theater, in which a LHO tried to fire off 2 shots. How did he kill Tippitt with an automatic and get caught with a non-functional revolver, just minutes later. Smells of a set up.

Another one is the ARRB testimony of Naval Photo Specialist Sandra Saunders. She states the print stock on the publically released autopsy photos is not what she used and the scenes depicted are completely different from what she processed. She disagrees entirely with all the publically released autopsy photographs

www.history-matters.com...]SOURCE

Finally I have mentioned this many times before, but look at Secret Service Agent James Sibert's ARRB drawing MD-88, regarding the rear exit wound he saw for many hours in the right rear of the Presidents head. He spent his entire time the casket landed at Andrews until the first autopsy was completed. He was not happy with the "official" autopsy photo shown to him at his ARRB hearing, showing an intact rear and damage to the right temple. He spent allot of time less than 3 feet from JFK's body during the autopsy.



You really need to get your feet wet before you say I'm telling sensational lies.

How's this for a good lie. On the 6th floor of the TSBD, other than Oswalds palmprint on a carton, the only other fingerprint found in the "Snipers Lair" belonged to Mac Wallace, a very close friend of LBJ of which their friendship lasted many years. What is his fingerprint doing on the 6th floor of the TSBD, the day LHO supposedly did his deed?

Regarding the caskets, read ARRB testimony of Riebe and Floyd and other Naval techs involved in the autopsy, and you will find "the" body arrived at different times, in difference caskets, in a body bag or wrapped in a sheet, with and without an Honor Guard. It's all right there for your to read.

And I also enjoy Glenn Beck, "Murdoch's Revenge". I watch him every chance I get and he's spot on. And that no lie.





[edit on 15-10-2009 by Oldnslo]



posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 03:43 PM
link   
so i guess were denying the obvious now? or shall i rest on the hope that some of these people are just greenhorns and haven't learned of the complexities and involvement of the controlling bodies. ya know my favorite phrase this week has been, "don't believe me! look it up for yourself!" but hey, just continue on regurgitating some spoon fed dribble, i just cant wait til one of you reference anne coulter!



posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 03:53 PM
link   
I think it's more of a case of people bashing the messenger and not paying attention to the message they are delivering.

You have to admit, GB is almost solely to thank/blame for Van Jones resigning. Please refute his evidence rather than pick on the personality. If you can't refute the evidence, then what does that mean?

He wouldn't be popular if he wasn't striking a chord with a lot of viewers.




top topics



 
3
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join