Semi-Viable Proof (if proven not to be a fake) of Evolution or possible gene splicing experiments, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 06:28 AM by spitefulgod
reply to post by LeTan



Hopefully it's not a fake, I'm sure time will tell, it's been spouted by several news sources, the image itself looks real although as you've pointed out you can never tell, xrays from snakes have shown that they do have the reminates of legs on their skeleton although none to the extent shown in the article.


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 06:36 AM by Republican08
reply to post by spitefulgod



If true, god will be quite pissed about his punishment toward the snake.

Now we must wait for it to speak english and tell us to eat apples...

I hear they keep doctors away!


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 07:14 AM by pieman
reply to post by spitefulgod



if it were me writing it, it would read "Semi-Viable Proof (if proven not to be a fake) of Evolution or possible gene splicing experiments".

sorry, i just like poking alledged "proof of evolution" with a big stick. darwin would have wanted it that way.

[edit on 22/9/09 by pieman]


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 07:17 AM by Republican08
Originally posted by pieman
reply to
post by spitefulgod



if it were me writing it, it would read "Semi-Viable Proof (if proven not to be a fake) of Evolution or possible gene splicing experiments".

sorry, i just like poking alledged "proof of evolution" with a big stick. darwin would have wanted it that way.

[edit on 22/9/09 by pieman]



Oh my god.

It's the perfect title for the thread now!

Gasp

It's just all greatness. I must stray away!

Good job everyone!


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 07:21 AM by pieman
reply to post by Republican08



sorry, did i get in the way of the christian bashing, sorry,didn't mean to spoil your fun.


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 07:59 AM by tinfoilman
reply to post by spitefulgod



Okay somebody said something about this that this is something the snake ate. Don't know about that. That might be the case.

If it's not though, then this actually might be disproof of evolution and more proof of the Intelligent Designers idea of adaptation. Which I don't really believe in BTW. Not a creationist or IDer, but I'll talk about it anyway.

Adaptation can happen in just a few generations given the right environment and you could see adaptation even in your life time. Even this week for that matter.

A thousand years is a long time when it comes to adaptation. It doesn't take millions or even billions of years like evolution does. The earth could only be a few thousand years old and it wouldn't be any problem at all for adaptation. It would be for evolution though.

After all it takes a lot of information in the DNA to build a leg if the theory of evolution is true.

But that's not what we see here. We see a snake with what seems almost to be a whole leg. So in one generation we went from no legs, to leg. BAM!

Well we're assuming here. Maybe there's a whole long line of snakes with just one leg somewhere, but that's a story for another day.

The evolutionist say it's an expression of a recessive gene. That's why it popped up so quick. Because the information was already there in the DNA somewhere.

In contrast an IDer or adaptationist, if you will, will say that obviously the creator was intelligent enough to include all the required information in the specie's DNA for the species to live in different environments.

Especially a creator like God who would know ahead of time that a flood so devastating was coming that it would change the environment for ever and that the environment would continue to change until the end of time. Sound like bunk? Let me you give you an example.

Most large software programs contain lots of what's called dead code or almost dead code that never gets ran 99 percent of the time, but when it is needed it's there and gets activated just like a recessive gene. Most of it is so the code will still run in different "environments" that it normally would not. Writing software code well so it can be portable and run in a multitude of "environments" is something we spend a lot of our time on actually.

However, it didn't evolve that way on its own. The coders planned for that as they created the software and planned it very painstaking every step of the way. And software programs are a lot less complex than DNA.

So, even humans are smart enough to add extra information to our creations so they can work in strange new environments. Would we suggest that a God would be any less thoughtful when coding our DNA? I highly doubt it. He's gotta be smarter than I am and I'm smart enough to do it with my creations.

The animals would need to adapt, so beef up the genetic code right from the get go. Just like I do my software code so it'll run on more machines than just your own.

No need for evolution. The information was always present in the DNA they would say.

Notice that the claim is the same on both sides. Both the Evolutionist and the Intelligent Designers make the same claim. The information was ALREADY present in the DNA. So, we see that this isn't proof for either side. It just leaves us with the same question we had before.

Where did the information come from to begin with? Evolution? Or the creator? I don't know. Don't ask me.

However, the only difference is, is that adaptation only takes a few generations to get going. Evolution can take billions of years or even longer.

Also, you seen those bacteria experiments where a scientist can get bacteria to mutate in a lab to synthesis new chemicals such as nylon for food?

Yet again, only takes a few months. They can also cause RNA to mutate in but a few hours.

The more evidence I see, it seems more and more is stacking up that evolution happens much more quickly than we thought it could.







[edit on 22-9-2009 by tinfoilman]


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 09:56 AM by spitefulgod
reply to post by tinfoilman



I doubt one (probably nonfunctional) foot would be a good adaption for a snake given it's in the same environment as other snakes, genetic throwback in my opinion, as you stated an evolutionist would say, definitely not a mutation as it's too complex, again as you stated.

[edit on 22/9/2009 by spitefulgod]


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 10:52 AM by spitefulgod
reply to post by DaRAGE



But if true it shows that the snake had an ancestor that once had legs so that the snake species evolved from something that we would consider a completely different species and not just a different breed, something that people who don't submit to evolution always cite

evolution affects only the species and doesn't create new species, that's GODs work.

Or so I'm led to believe that's what they think.

[edit on 22/9/2009 by spitefulgod]


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 11:10 AM by lycopersicum
reply to post by pieman



Damit man, I totally messed up my monitor,when i read that ,next time warn us coffe drinkers when reading, LOL !!
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



First Heartless Man - You Don\'t Really Need A Heart or A Pulse
  Posted 7 days ago with 51 member flags
Doctor Uses Coconut Oil to Reverse Husband\'s Alzheimer\'s Disease
  Posted 13 days ago with 28 member flags
A brief look at water fluoridation and the insanity of it
  Posted 10 days ago with 28 member flags
Brains of Addicts Are Inherently Abnormal
  Posted 7 days ago with 20 member flags
FDA say body is a drug and has the right to regulate it!
  Posted 10 days ago with 18 member flags
MPD/DID and Quantum Psychiatry
  Posted 14 days ago with 12 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 69 replies
Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 6 hours ago, 63 replies