posted on Sep, 22 2009 @ 12:10 AM
Originally posted by wayno
reply to post by talisman
I can't believe the architect interviewed actually came up with such lame excuses for the buildings coming down and expected us to believe him.
The need to get to the bottom of this thing is just so pressing I can't stand it. We have to keep the pressure up to get a legitimate and valid
assessment of what happened that day.
Yep, I thought that guy looked really, really bad and his excuse for such was truly pathetic.
The interesting thing was that an independent chemist who is skeptical, admitted that the nano-thermite could do the job, only that a very large
amount would have to be used, and he was more unsure of the way they came up with the dust. The samples were not that well controlled-at least he gave
Well, I think we should thank the Gov for making it so damn difficult for anyone to really do some independent research on this, since so much of the
material was disposed of.
I also think the chain of custody is not that problematic as that chemist worried, since it seems to show up in all 4 samples. see USGS on finding
[edit on 22-9-2009 by talisman]