We have
HACCP and the food safety con job .
Preceded by
The Grand Federal Reserve rip off and if you look deeply enough you will find the same people
behind
The Great Global Warming Hoax.
They are
David Rockefeller and
Maurice Strong
Maurice Strong worked for the Rockefellers in Saudi Arabian Oil in 1953, was trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation, and went big in Canadian Oil
Companies starting in 1954 despite being a dirt poor high school drop out in 1947. He started the "Environmental Movement/Global Warming Hoax in
1972 and was Chief advisor to the World Bank and the United Nations.
In 1981, as head of AZL, he was sued for allegedly hyping the stock
ahead of a merger later
Al Gore
heaped praises on Strong's company Molten Metal Technology, Inc. The stock prices rose sharply
"when the federal government decided to
stop handing out grants, he and the other corporate officers sold off $15.3 million in personal shares of stock. The stock dropped to $5 soon
afterward, but Strong had already made his money." And then there was
Strong's involvement in the
"Food for Oil Scandal" A moral upstanding citizen this man is NOT. Now we find Strong is one of the
Creators of carbon credit scheme cashing in on Global Warming, along with Al Gore.
Obama was the lawyer who helped set the company up. DO you really believe this Con Artist???
This is part of the eleven pages I have showing Global Warming is a Hoax.
First “Follow the Money”:
Link
In the USA there has been a lot of money spent on trying to blame Mankind (CO2) for climate variability instead of asking the question what causes
climate to vary. Research on anything besides CO2 is despite political pressure. Many papers have a half hearted blurb stating that whatever their
research found it is not as big a factor as Man made CO2. Al Gore, Maurice Strong and Obama are all part of the
Chicago Climate Exchange And then there is the
investment
bankers (You always find the bankers behind everything pulling the strings)
THE SUN
Fig 2.1 (pg 6) is the Spectrum of incident solar radiation at the top of the atmosphere and at sea level.
“Because UV radiation is absorbed in
the stratosphere, the temperature increase in this altitude range. Located at about 50 km altitude, the stratopause is the top boundary of this layer.
” graph pg 3 fig 1.1 Atmospheric temperature profile and layering Link
The above graphs shows why I can not understand why any one would think CO2 is the main driver of climate. If someone told me it was oxygen, water
(Atmospheric and seas) and the sun, I would be more inclined to believe them. CO2 is such a small blip on the energy absorption scale you can barely
see it. Also as you proceed from left to right the energy per unit wavelength decreases. This makes CO2 contribution even less
Link
There is no more energy to be absorbed at the CO2 wavelengths. Which agrees with Fig 2.1
graph showing CO2 log
response: The greenhouse effect of atmospheric CO2 follows a logarithmic curve with CO2 concentration. As CO2 levels continue to rise, the greenhouse
temperature boost from CO2 flattens out. Far from being a "tipping point" the climate effects from rising CO2 fade out.
Link
This image, courtesy of Dr. Judith Lean at the US Naval Research Laboratory, shows the same graph as Fig 2.1 with energy variability overlaying the
spectrum of solar radiation from 10 to 100,000 nm (dark blue). The variability between Solar Maximum and Solar Minimum is in green and the relative
transparency of Earth's atmosphere at sea level is in light blue.
Link
UV can vary up to 10% and effects the ozone and stratosphere:
“UV variability between 200 and 400 nm is almost a factor of 10 larger than was
estimated from earlier satellite data.” Link
“Computer Processing of Remotely Sensed Images” Graph of Sun and Earth black body showing relationship:
Link
The NASA graph is a complete and utter lie
Link
Why this is a lie is covered in a new peer reviewed paper published in the International Journal of Modern Physics. By G. Gerlich, R. D.
Tscheuschner: Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics.
Full
Paper, 114 pages, 1.54MB and yes I have read the entire paper.
The paper of course was attacked, Dr. Gerlich’s rebuttal to alarmists is preserved at:
Link
And on and on
There are also the sub topics of:
MAGNETIC FIELDS
EARTH ROTATION
long-term fluctuation of the Schwabe period (LSP) of sunspots number (SSN) has been
found to have high correlation with the variation of the length-of-day
OCEANS
1.
Pacific Decadal Oscillation:
2.
Southern Oscillation
AND UNDERSEA VOLCANOES:
1.
The primary source of carbon/CO2 is outgasing from the Earth's interior at midocean ridges,
hotspot volcanoes, and subduction-related volcanic arcs
2.
Seismic activity in 2008 is apparently FIVE TIMES what it was twenty years
ago.
3.
team estimates that in total there could be about 3 million submarine
volcanoe
The Science just does not support CO2 as the man cause of climate variation and the whole hoax is starting to unravel as scientist start to speak
out.