Mysterious Alignment of Ancient Sites of the World, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 101 times


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 07:44 PM by mblahnikluver
reply to post by afterschoolfun



My roommate and I were watching a show last night and it was talking about the Kensington Stone lining up with another on the East Coast and I instantly thought of all the structures lined up on the same line as in your post. I was trying to tell my roommate about it but wasnt too sure of it. I have always wondered about this. I dont believe this is a coincidence but that is just me. I mean how do all these things just happen to line up?? I would love to learn more about this. So odd that I was just wondering about this last night and now here is your post!! S&F!!


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 08:00 PM by afterschoolfun
First of all: Nice find newworld. I'll have to look into that later.

Second of all: everything else. So there's some plot holes in this theory of alignment Ive seen so far

1. Just a coincidence, after all civilization started off near the equator so a lot of sites will be in that area

Fair enough. but maybe you think that because the pictures were a bit misleading. It looks like they just go straight around the equator which, in fact, they don't



It seems like kind of a stretch to say they built their civilizations along that circle because of continence. For all the people to spread out over the world and cross the Alaska land bridge and go all the way down to South Am. and just happen to align Easter island with the Pyramids and Machu Picchu. Stranger things have happened I suppose...

2. What significance are all these sites anyways?

I really don't know. I don't think anyone could truly understand why any of them were built let alone dozens. But thats what I want to find out. That's what led me to find those Alaskan UFO sightings, could be related, could not.

3. What about the other sites left out?

I just found a list of anomalies and put them in google earth. But maybe Stonehenge and the Mayans were left out of the loop. The more I read about ancient civilization, the more I question the time line. Maybe the 'circle sites' are older than we give them credit for. Just a guess.

Does that answer any questions?

[edit on 21-9-2009 by afterschoolfun]



reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 08:13 PM by afterschoolfun
reply to post by srsen



Maybe that's why everything is going to hell in a hand basket nowadays.


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 09:00 PM by afterschoolfun
reply to post by promomag



Awesome! That website really shows everything, angles, length ratios and expalins why some sites are left out of the great circle from the OP


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 10:08 PM by ghostryder21
is there any way you can give the cooridnates of the point where everything converges in alaska? seems to me that it looks like it meets up near theHAARP base.

Map

it would be intresting to see if it does, this area has ben related to everything from solar ionization, frequency missels to even time and dimensional travel.


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 11:09 PM by Freeborn
reply to post by afterschoolfun



I din't think the doubt about what you have presented is due to the sites you have included but rather from those that you have excluded, for example Stonehenge.

However, unlike some I certainly won't dismiss the idea that there is something in what you say, but I do need something a little more 'concrete' for me to be swayed.



reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 11:13 PM by whatshenneping
reply to post by promomag



the reactions back than and now show that there is AWARENESS,
i guess we are on the right track..


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 11:24 PM by afterschoolfun
reply to post by Freeborn



I know what you're saying. Just check out this site. All of the sections but 10 for other alignments. Really a incredible site.

HERE


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 12:31 AM by xxxcosta
reply to post by ghostryder21



Yes, that would be cool to have the coordinates of that cross point in Alaska.
You might be close with your assumption of HAARP location.


reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 12:52 AM by afterschoolfun
reply to post by xxxcosta



Got it. It's not exact but its pretty close. Close enough to raise a few eyebrows I think





reply posted on 22-9-2009 @ 12:55 AM by ::.mika.::
reply to post by newworld



on worldmisteries.com
sectioon ancient equator

www.world-mysteries.com...

''

a guy found something with google earth
the theory there is that pyramid were landing site. (as a matter of fact, coming from space, the best place to land on a planet is its equator...)
and pole shifting yep
ps:the theory of the brown dwarf posted on page1 makes a great cause for change of equator/pole shift

[edit on 22-9-2009 by ::.mika.::]

edit::cant find it sorry

[edit on 22-9-2009 by ::.mika.::]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



More Mysterious Nazca Lines From Space
  Posted 6 days ago with 124 member flags
The Aztec and Norse god of war are both missing one hand.
  Posted 17 days ago with 48 member flags
63,000-Year-Old Modern Human Skull Found in Laos
  Posted 18 days ago with 38 member flags
Multiple Human Species Were Likely The Norm
  Posted 11 days ago with 37 member flags
The Sumerian \'Flood-Storm\' weapon.
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags