It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Win vs. Fail - Individual Ufologists

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 02:26 PM
link   
IMO:

Bob Lazar: fail
Billy Meier: both. i think he's a real contactee, but I also think he's a liar and has an ego problem
Nancy Leider: neither. I think she is a victim of authentic negative alien contact.
sitchin: EPIC fail.
Travis Walton: win.
Betty and Barney: win.
James Gilliland: major win.




posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 02:40 PM
link   
IMO:

Bob Lazar: win. His name in the Los Alamos directory is damming.
Billy Meier: epic fail. A contactee wouldn't try so hard to fake it.
Nancy Leider: fail. Charlatan.
sitchin: disinfo fail. the idea is right but the details are all bull.
Travis Walton: EPIC win.
Betty and Barney: undecided.
James Gilliland: once he gets good video footage I'll give him a win.





[edit on 21-9-2009 by breakingdradles]



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 03:08 PM
link   
IMO:

Bob Lazar: Not sure... probably a little of both.
Billy Meier: Massive fail.
Nancy Leider: Nutz.
sitchin: Fail beyond Von Daniken.
Travis Walton: Big win.
Betty and Barney: win.
James Gilliland: Both. I believe his sightings but his interpretation leaves much to be desired.



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 04:39 PM
link   
Anyone care to add a bit of depth to the thread and give a few reasons as to why they believe these particular people are either win/fail?
Would lead to some interesting and probably informative reading.



posted on Sep, 22 2009 @ 09:48 AM
link   
Yeah, I'd be interested too.



new topics

top topics
 
4

log in

join