A Reminder About Iran, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 03:43 PM by mkross1983
reply to post by DeltaChaos



I think you might have jumped in here a little late. I'm not wanting anyone to attack Iran. Please see earlier posts.


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 03:46 PM by mkross1983
reply to post by argentus



Good point. The centrifuges were for peaceful nuclear power in every article I've read that didn't have slant to it. I will have to read up more about what you said with the new enrichment going on.

I still have yet to see any agency claim Iran is making anything other than nuclear power.

It would be nice to get a correctly translated message for sure. I've seen in a lot of places though that he did not say what the MSM said he did. He did not claim Iran was going to wipe Israel off the map.

It was more along the lines that Israel would destroy itself through it's own policies.



reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 05:21 PM by The time lord
Originally posted by mkross1983
reply to
post by Legion2112



Ok. I hear what you are saying.

Why is it do you think these other countries in the Middle East would want Israel gone?

I'm not implying anything, just looking for why you think this is the case.

[edit on 21-9-2009 by mkross1983]



1. The devil knows his time is up, according to prophecy Israel will once again be the biggest factor to the sign of the end times.

2. Take Israel away, takes God promise away and make him turn out a liar.

3. Because Israel was build and succeeded so they want it off them.

4. Because Palestine was never a country or a culture, it was just land mass ruled by Britain.

5. Because they are Jews, its seen as an honour to kill the Jews according to their scriptures.

5. The Conquest mentality, every inch we give they take a mile and make it their own.

6. As long as infidels are driven out or they are under sharia intolerant laws they can throw whoever they want out.

7. Wiping out the Jews like every other demonic forces in charge of the opposing enemy is the only agenda because it seals all the wrong things up.

8. Temple Mount is a sign, once that is out of the way prophecy begins, but the golden lid is stuck on for now.


Arab Caliphate rule (638–1099 CE) Out with The Romans now a new danger.

In 638 CE, following the Siege of Jerusalem, the Caliph Omar Ibn al-Khattab and Safforonius, the Patriarch of Jerusalem, signed Al-Uhda al-'Omariyya (The Umariyya Covenant), an agreement that stipulated the rights and obligations of all non-Muslims in Palestine.[85] Christians and Jews where considered People of the Book, enjoyed some protection but had to pay a special poll tax called jizyah ("tribute").
Infedel Tax.

Britain ruled Palestine between 1920 and 1948, a period referred to as the "British Mandate." - The preamble of the mandate declared:


[edit on 21-9-2009 by The time lord]


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 05:44 PM by sanchoearlyjones
reply to post by mkross1983



I wanted to pop in; I just saw, and read the OP. Very well done, and I agree with Warrenb; it's now in my favorites. The information is concise, and I see the naysayer's are picking at straws, or making childish "funnies"

S&F


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 09:34 PM by dooper
reply to post by mkross1983



Name the wars that Israel started.

Name them.

And for your information the manner of the language is nuanced. An Iranian who I work with understood the meaning clearly.

Wipe Israel off the map.

He caught a lot of flak, put some apologists to work on it, and apparently, you bought into that line of crap.

Now, name the wars Israel started.


reply posted on 27-9-2009 @ 01:38 PM by The time lord
reply to post by vox2442



All I am saying or should have expanded is that sometimes the little stories that cause these wars are not always explained or researched well, sometimes you have to dig deep, it always seems when Israel is concerned the story backfires on them. Not untill 9/11 has the world realised or stood up to these constant Islamic threats. Many Islamic threats, intolerant laws, human rights in the Middle East was unheard of, many people did not even care untill it effected them or the West directly, now that it has caught attention we take notice, but under the rubble many stories and reasons have been lost, it's easy to infiltrait as a journalist against a democracy, but its harder to do the same insight of such closed off opressed societies unless journalists dig deep, we don't know how much abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan has gone on, its just the tip of the iceberg, but no one cared before.



reply posted on 27-9-2009 @ 02:26 PM by dooper
reply to post by vox2442



Clever, but no cigar.

The Masters of Warfare have all determined the offensive mindset is critical if one is to maintain freedom of movement.

They likewise tout "offensive defense."

It's another term for "necessity."

In other words, if your opponent is raring back his arm to hit you with a hammer, while he's still in the backward motion, you grab him up close and gut him with the knife in your hand.

A man comes at you with a machete, you'll likely die if you wait for his attack. You'll likely die if you try to run. You attack the man with the machete, and get in close so he has a real problem trying to use it. He already has one hand occupied, so if you're quick and decisive, you can bite his throat, and while it takes three major bites, you can rip his throat out with your teeth, and that machete will just fall to the ground.

Offensive defense. Even in defense, always attack.

The fighting in 1948-49 was going on BEFORE the push for independence.

The others likewise were offensive defenses.

I don't consider the word of one old man to be the definitive final determination of a group effort.



[edit on 27-9-2009 by dooper]


reply posted on 28-9-2009 @ 03:05 PM by KingAmongstMen
Iran is not North Korea. The leaders don't run around causing trouble and restricting freedoms for the sake of their health. That's not to say they're justified in their approach, but the question is this; Why are the powers that be within Iran reluctant to embrace true Democracy and Freedom? Is it because they're just nasty psychopaths? No.

For every action there is a reaction. The restricted freedoms and farce liberty within Iran is a direct result of international meddling. Mainly by the Americans, British and Israelis. It's a REACTION.

Now if we entertain the above to be true, we're left with the question of why the forementioned nations would bother to meddle with Iran? What purpose would that serve? The anwser is simple, power and oil.

The lack of freedoms and increasingly hostile and irrational rule in Iran is the byproduct of endless international meddling.

We all want freedom, liberties and safety for the Iranian people... Well, most of us. They're the victims in all of this. But we've got to look at it clearly. We can't just say freedom for Iranians, without analysing fairly why Iran is in the state it's in.

For 50 years America has been meddling with Iran. Internally and externally. Whether it's government influenced media propoganda, or actual CIA presence within Iran.

Past Iranian governments however have reached out to the US and western nations for help in growing internal Democracy. We've always spat in their face. The last time being not so long ago, in Bushes presidency... The European Union have also refused to guarantee Iranian security, countless times, when Iran has tried to move forwards as a Democratic power, willing to put a halt to ALL uranium programs. We don't have to look that far back to see far worse criminal acts. 1953, the Shah, a brutal dictator, illegaly put into power by the States and Britain. In 1979 the Iranians took back power of their country. What did the US and Britain do? We supported Suddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war. We still continue with ridiculous sanctions against Iran to this day! Continuelly FORCING them into abandoning Democracy, so we have an excuse to invade.

We're allies with the Saudi Arabian dictatorship, a far more brutal regime. Where are the protests for the Saudis? I don't see an international protest for their freedoms. And they live under an even harsher and less democratic nation! Why aren't we threatening them? Why not Israel?

We're not subjected to a barrage of anti-Saudi propoganda, because we're friends with them. The term for this is hypocrisy.

The Iranian government are not the root problem. They're the result, the byproduct, of the root problem. That root problem being the American government and their tyranical foreign policies. Aswell as their sidekicks, Britain and Israel.

There are 2 types of people in this world. The educated, and those who support military action against Iran.

I will post some informative documentaries for those ignorant to the relationship between Iran and the West in both the present and years gone bye, if anyone is interested.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 17 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 107 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 9 hours ago, 88 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 7 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 11 hours ago, 48 replies