I was recently going through an old family cook book and stumbled across this one:

How to make oil and other fossil fuels

1. Take planet full of 7 billion humans
2. Nuke the 7 billion humans
3. Add huge man eating reptiles to find and devour remaining humans
4. Nuke the reptiles
5. Let cool for 400,000 years
6. Drill to extract fossil fews

For more than one serving repeat 1,2,3, and 4.

Serving size last 6,000 years and feeds 7 Billion humans

I love these kind of microwave recipes best!


I have to tell you, I have been dying to try this one out, oh boy!

[edit on 21/9/09 by ProtoplasmicTraveler]

these dates coincide with the birth of cities and civilisations... rather than with self based dependancy. my guess is we went from 5 cows for me to 500 cows 5 for me, 10 for breeding and the rest for the city officials or markets....

mesopotamia birth was 6000 bc ... about 8000 years ago, fits perfectly with your carbon rise. methane and c02 from livestock production on civilisation scales rather than subsitance scales.

no aliens ... no gods... just basic man and growth.

not that i dont believe in ancient aliens... (:

Haven't read all the posts, but I can't help but think of Thomas Brophy's speculations about some of the megalithic alignments of the Nabta Playa.

Their alignments correspond to several stars in the constellation of Orion, and their distances, calculated by a scaling of succesive prime numbers, show the distances to those stars, the distances of secondary bodies orbiting those stars, the radial velocities of those stars, and the orbital velocities of those secondary bodies. Some other excavated sites, specifically 'complex structure A' shows the Milky Way galaxy and where we are in it, and a second stone perhaps shows the background radiation of the universe, according to him. He has a compelling argument, but there are some missing links, IMO. But the numbers are there and fit the alignments at least.

I won't go into details because it's pretty thick with astronomical data/numbers and should be a thread on it's own, but if his calculations and speculations are correct, then how did these people know this without the aid of advanced technology? Perhaps we were much more knowledgable and advanced than what is currently thought/accepted.

During the last ice age there was a comet impact about 12,900 years ago.

This caused a even colder period(Younger Dryas event) that dropped the sea levels more.
This caused the sea pressure on sea bed methane deposits to loss there stable pressure that hold them as methane slush on the sea floor.

This cause a period of global warming.
As the ice sheet of the ice age melted this released even more methane that was trapped under the ice sheet and cause even more global warming.
This lasted till about 8000 years ago and then we had another turn around and another period of global cooling due to low solar activity.
At this 8000 year mark the temperatures were about 3 degrees C higher then they are now.
After that the earth had a number of major volcano eruptions that cooled the plant even more.
Just a few of the 'major'(over 100 million tons Ejecta{MTE]) eruptions for refraince Krakatau Indonesia was small putting out only 20+ million tons

Crater Lake, Oregon Mount Mazama 7,700 years ago. 100+MTE
Aniakchak Caldera 3,450 years ago. 100+MTE
Mount Pinatubo 9000, 6000–5000 and 3900–2300 years ago. 100+MTE each time.
Kikai Ryukyu Islands, Japan 6300 years ago 100+MTE
We have not had a volcano of this size and type erupt in the last 200 years.

Plus about 8000 years ago the ocean currents restarted after the last ice age this would have cooled the tropic waters and warmed the polar waters
in the way they are now.

Without this current the polar waters grow even colder and cause a growth in the ice caps to ice age size.
And the hotter then normal tropic waters feed more moisture to the polar ice caps. This was why you had 2+ mile thick ice over Canada the last ice age.

MAN HAD nothing to DO with any of this.
and man is not causing global warming now.

FROM THE OPENING POST LINK

Then 7,000 years ago—following the Neolithic Revolution's spread across Europe and Asia—atmospheric carbon went up instead of going down as was expected from the established pattern

CARBON went UP.
------------------------------

if the glaciers were defrosting then there would be more land and soil for plants and trees to grow, which would mean CARBON/co2 would decrease.

More trees and plants equals less co2 and more oxygen3 to breathe.

although it is possible that the ice that was defrosting around the poles released carbon, i doubt it would release more co2 than the plants growing in its space could photosynthesize.

it would release the co2 all at once and within 20-30 years the trees that bloosmed where the ice once was would counter act that.

i know that methane is 20-40 times worse for the ozone than co2, and cows produce much of the methane from todays problems. livestock could not have done this back then as there were so few humans and even less beasts of burden.

Could a methane gas pocket have erupted, SURE but where is the evidence of a gas pocket erupting, that intervend and dissolved around the entire world. surely if this happened on a global scale there would be evidence.

could the human farming of crops cause a noticeable change in co2 all the way back then, when we were just forming our first great civilizations?

i doubt it but i am just guessing. did we use the slash and burn techniques back then?

another NO becuase there was so much empty space why destroy a forest?

there was a meteoric impact in north america 7000-10000 years ago that most likely landing around where the great lakes are now, and most likely shattered the ice, and increased the global warming that was already taking place due to the magnetic pole alignment.

the earth's magnetice poles flip every 100,000 years if i am not mistaken


i have not thought of a good explanation as of yet, but i am thinking and i love this topic

i will sleep on it and purpose an idea tomorrow

First of all,I want to say that I do not believe that historians are corrupted and trying to hide the truth from the people. I think they're just doing their best to find the truth with what has been learnt to them as "plausible".
Now, back on the main topic. I assume something big happened at the time. There are many flaws in the original theory. First : why would our ancestors burn entire forests, while these were the very places in which they could find their food (game, fruits and all). Second : why would they produce SO MUCH food ? If hunting and gathering allowed them to survive, then they would only have needed small fields. Or is it something that caused a population boom that forced them to grow crops ? And last but not least : a hunter-gatherer life's actually easier than a farmer's life. Let me explain my point with an example :
Flood strikes and all crops are destroyed (or anything else that would have the same effect). The farmer is condemned to starve for a whole year before getting a new harvest. The hunter gatherer only needs to go hunting gathering somewhere else. Also, if there is a bad harvest, the farmer will be affraid for the winter. The hunter gatherer, having no fields to watch, moves south every year where the winter's warmer.

Also, hunters gatherers knew that the seed gave the plant which gave the fruit. They weren't that dumb.

So, to me, it's obvious that something FORCED men to start farming.