It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To date, there is an absence of evidence for the biblical story regarding the walls of Jericho. This does not disprove the biblical data (see Dumbrell 1985:130–39) but does exemplify the serious problems in an apologetic use of archaeology.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by Psychonaughty
Then all discussion of morality, evil and good is entirely moot. If we're all just different aspects of one creator trying to learn more about it's own existence, then we should allow this one creator the right to conduct it's learning experiences on it's own. Allow good and evil to play out it's course rather than attempting to lock up evil and throw it away. Who are we to judge the totality of an infinite creator trying to experience these two facets of itself?
Why strive to be only good, how does the one creator learn of evil if various aspects are trying to do away with it? Why punish evil if evil is nothing more than an equal part of the one creator? I see no point in being moral with this line of thought. Why should I be only good to others when evil is part of the one creators learning experience of itself?
there simply is a karmatic cyclical inertia...You get what you put out, you get what you deserve.
Side note: The key to stopping karma is forgiveness.
Evil simply means isolating yourself from connection to others to get closer or better yourself instead of helping better other selves, through progress one entity who is evil understands to keep getting closer to themselves they must be closer everything else for it is all a singular entity.
The concept of good and evil is but a reasoning for choosing of our paths, in the bigger picture there is only a singular thought, a singular being, infinity.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by Conclusion
I'm not discrediting some of the historical accuracies of the biblical texts. The bible can indeed be used as an accurate guide to some thing's that happened in the past, just the same as a lot of other mythological text's have been used to discover thing's once thought to be *only* myth.
There are a few thing's that there is no evidence for that the bible give's accounts for. There was no world wide flood, no records of the exodus, even historical documents outside of the bible for Jesus are tenuous at best. If you read fiction books or watch movies or television, do you take the stories as accurate representations of reality if they depict actual events in the story line that happened in real life and then assume that the rest of it must be true as well because some of it was?
Your second link discusses how there is lack of evidence, but that it shouldn't be a sign that the bible is inaccurate.
To date, there is an absence of evidence for the biblical story regarding the walls of Jericho. This does not disprove the biblical data (see Dumbrell 1985:130–39) but does exemplify the serious problems in an apologetic use of archaeology.
Proof of Worldwide floods.
Proof of the Exodus
One thing I would like to point out. If Moses and his people where not in Egypt and left. How could they have got the names right?
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by Conclusion
Proof of Worldwide floods.
Your first link is against the world wide flood.
Second link appears to be pure speculation.
Third link has answers for and against.
Fourth link discusses a Mayan oral tradition and date the structures well after the biblical flood account.
Here is a few links for you to read.
LINK
LINK
This one is lengthy, but you'll learn a lot.
Proof of the Exodus
There are at least four dates given for the Exodus.
First link is speculation as evident from the notes section and throughout the text.
Second link doesn't work.
Third link is of questionable source, I would prefer something a bit more reputable to be honest.
Doing a search myself on the Exodus, I can find no mention of any archeological records indicating that it was discovered that the Egyptians recorded this supposed important event in history.
One thing I would like to point out. If Moses and his people where not in Egypt and left. How could they have got the names right?
Have you been to the many places you've heard about? How do you get their names right? Have you ever met someone in prehistory? How did you get their names right?
[edit on 29-10-2009 by sirnex]
[edit on 29-10-2009 by sirnex]
I know that all of this sounds absurd to you. I can't blame you for that. If it didn't happen to me it would sound the same. Science just does not explain it for me. There is more. I wish you could understand. If you do not experience it then can not know. How do you prove to a blind man that the universe is beautiful. You cant. They just have to take your word for it. Anyways enough of this thread for me. Have a good one.
Originally posted by ineverknew
Now my definition of God is an entity that is omnipotent and omnipresent.
yes,exactly. it is self-exploration. The whole of existence and the whole of reality is simply the self-exploration prcoess,the self-analysis. Introspection if you will, and the mroe separate fragments there are,the more different viewpoints there are(for ex 7 billuion people having 7 billion with each having their own unique viewpoint) For ex our viewpoints concerning these things seem to match,but they are nto quite identical still. Them roe viewpoints there are,the more rich the experience is and the more knowledge is gained through self exploration. We are discovering and rediscovering ourselves.
Originally posted by Magantice
Originally posted by Psychonaughty
reply to post by 30_seconds
That is because people believe that the One Infinite Creator is a seperate being when everything IS the One Infinite Creator, there is no seperate-ness....
My comment has often tended to be that the Creator is attempting to gain in knowledge and appreciation of Itself. The Creator wishes to know Itself. Thusly, it sends forth parts of Itself within illusion to see what will happen
and to learn from the colors created in the palette of emotions that you
have created through many experiences and incarnations.
Dearest Psychonaughty
This was explained to me exactly as you discribe above some years ago by "The Council". The parts that the creator sent forth into the universe are known as souls. we need to BE AS ONE because we are a part of the ONE. so.......we Are because he IS.
I highly suggest you read the whole 100 pages of HIDDEN HANDS information
Originally posted by Psychonaughty
Originally posted by sirnex
Originally posted by Psychonaughty
There really is no way to explain it in a narrow human perspective without being hypocritical.
Then you invalidate the entire argument.
Than invalidated it is.
I'm simply trying to explain the core of truth that the bible has built itself upon about 'satan'/lucifer.
Time is only present within this term/density of light that we experience in the current incarnation.
Your probably expressing the 4th density or different light (density), that the earth will be progressing to within the next 2-3 years (this being on certain vortices depending on an infinite amount of outcomes).
There is no fear for me I do not fear death, nor do I fear anything at all for fear is unimportant as I know that I will be indefinitley.