Originally posted by Aeons
Seriously?
SERIOUSLY?
The MAJORITY of people didn't think, "they publiziced a case of hydrocephelus in a goat?" but instead thought and are willing to defend the idea of
it being the result of man on goat sex?!?!?
SERIOUSLY?????
This.
My God. I'm really appalled by the amount of people jumping on the 'inter-species sex' bandwagon. If inter-species sex produced little fauns that
look like James McAvoy in costume, I'm sure this wouldn't be the first time we had one of these creatures. And it wouldn't look like a bleeding
potato.
Let's face it, the reason why they didn't include the pictures in the original article is because IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE A FAUN. It looks like a
mutated blob! If this is a result of inter-species sex, the offender is probably so ugly goats are literally his only option.
Wow. Definition of an unreliable source!