It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by StrangeLands
a) Your insistence that anyone who reads the bible will understand God's word (despite the fact that I, and thousands of people like me, have read the bible but prefer our fiction in paperback)...
b) The fact that you had the temerity to inaccurately correct my grammer (you said "Christianity", therefore I said "it". It's an "it", you see. Not a "they". Is that clear?)...
c) Your declaration that "Morons doing stupid things in the name of God is not to be mistaken with the religion of 'Christianity'"actually refers, in the examples I gave, to the Catholic Church, and the Pope in particular, and if they can't be considered Christians, who the hell can?
Firstly, you've got to stop picking up on hyperbole and humour and treating them like serious arguments - I know that scientists and rationalists aren't the same thing as atheists, but you'll find that most scientists and rationalists are atheists.
you don't know that, unless you have secret evidence that you're keeping from the rest of us. You believe it. Not, my credible friend, the same thing. And if you only believe it, then you must rationally accept the possibility that you are wrong. And if there is a possibility that you are wrong, then you must admit your faith is flawed.
Thirdly, as I stated earlier, I am no stranger to the bible. I know it's easier for you to believe - there's that word again - that everyone else is stupider than you, but it's simply not the case.
Unfortunately, that negates your "the answer is in the bible, you've never read the bible, you can't possibly understand my point" argument.
But I do, jakko, I do. That's why I can summon up this little nugget to answer your question regarding NephraTari's earlier point about materialism:
"It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."
But then, you'll probably protest that the Bible was written by morons and "is not to be mistaken with the religion of 'Christianity'" either.
If you're just going to attack my posts with denial and insults, jakko, then you'd better be damn sure that you've got your facts straight - and I mean all the facts, not just the ones that suit your argument.
Originally posted by NephraTari
My question to you is why do some people feel the need to believe everything was created by an all powerful being?
Originally posted by Jakko
People may interpret some passages differently, it does not change the main message.
Originally posted by jakkoSome Christians inflicted their own worldview on others, not Christianity, Christianity is a religion and can not inflict anything, "is that clear"?
Originally posted by jakko
Where did you get the idea that the Catholic Church is a good representation of Christians and Christianity?
Originally posted by jakko
Your little "hyperbole" does nothing but underline the cliche that smart people do not believe in God, and dumb people do.
If that was ment as humour then it wasn't really funny.
Originally posted by jakko
First of all, my "secret evidence" is the story of Jesus as put in the bible.
Originally posted by jakko
This explains your entire view on Christians.
People who did not find God yet are not "stupider" in any way.
Originally posted by jakko
I just see how you have a lot of misconceptions regarding the bible and Christianity, reading the bible would help.
Originally posted by jakkoI'm going to tell you that you're ripping parts of the bible out of their context to support your point.
Originally posted by jakkoI did not mean to insult you, but I sometimes have a way of saying things a bit harsher than I mean, but I am quite sure I have my facts straight.
It's pretty hard to have a discussion about the bible with someone who barely read it.
Originally posted by StrangeLands
People have interpreted the bible in a thousand different ways over two thousand years - can you really deny the possibility that your interpretation might be wrong?
On the contrary, I deliberately referred to Christianity as a monlithic entity so as not to offend hypersensitive Christians who take things personally. Christianity - as a religion - can take actions, through it's followers. Saying it can't is akin to saying that United States can't take action, or NASA can't take action.
Well, they see themselves as Christians, and I think it's their opinion that counts in this case.
Well, I don't like to generalise too much, but I'd say that's a reasonable assessment. I said "most", after all, not "all".
Really? And yet you've described non-Christians (myself in particular) as moronic, stupid, idiots and retarded. Is this one of the Christian double-standards which are so prevalent?
By "misconceptions", I take it you refer to the things I disagree with you about? Why, could this be another example of non-Christians not being as knowledgeable as Christians? And isn't it somewhat dependant on your interpretation being flawless? That's an interesting display of Christian humility...
Am I? What an unprecedented offence! There are certainly no examples of Christians decontextualising parts of the bible to serve their own ends
And, just to close off, another subtle hint that I'm stupid. How satisfying. I suppose I should be flattered that I've progressed from having "never" read the bible to having "barely" read it.
I believe there must be a creator because matter cannot create matter. That being the case, the only logical assumption is a creator.