This is a bit if a tricky wicket. I mean, yeah, the article from the Atlantic News Telegraph states the story in an apolitical manner. And they are
factually correct. If, however, the AP was also correct and the incident was based on political mud-slinging, then they are just as correct to
publish it. My hesitation on saying the AP was faultless stems from the fact that adding the political dimension didn't really add anything to the
story.
I would chalk this up to differant reporting styles.


). I don't really care what people want to say, so long as they have the right to say it.
A sign of maturity, as a person and as a culture, is to accept that other people can view the world in radically differant ways. I don't agree with
radical left or radical right or radical mimes. I think they all deserve a chance to speak without filters, though.