What does it cover?
1) Health (Medical)
2) Evolution (Creationism)
3) Ancient Civilization
I can keep on going, but I think you get my point. Now, on to my comments!
The whole calorie intake thing makes a whole lot of sense to me. If we eat concentrated food (meat) vs. uncooked food (foraging), it would allow us to perform more for longer, giving us the ability to change from gathers to hunter/gatherers. We need energy to build things, to make things, to think about things. For the people who say raw food is better, this part caught my attention:
Cultural, historical and culinary clues point to the plausibility of Wrangham’s intuition. There is no society on Earth that does not cook; not a single people exists on raw food alone. The most remote hunter-gatherer tribes might not have microwaves, but they still pack beans in hot rocks. While the idea of modern humans as carnivores is well-established, our bodies cannot fend off toxins and bacteria found in raw meat, as you would expect if we had evolved to eat it uncooked. It is incredibly hard for us to bite into and digest raw tubers, such as potatoes. And there are no reliable accounts of survivors lasting for more than a couple of months on raw food; even the survivors of the 1972 Andes plane crash are reported to have cooked their fellow passengers before eating them.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
Very interesting stuff. Fire made us who we are today. Got to love evolution.
www.timesonline.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)




