It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


PID - Motivations for the Murder of Paul McCartney

page: 64
<< 61  62  63    65 >>

log in


posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 10:18 AM

Originally posted by Dakudo

This is seriously scraping the barrel of total and utter idiocy.

edit on 17-2-2012 by Dakudo because: (no reason given)

Truer words were never spoken.

posted on Dec, 6 2012 @ 10:03 AM
PID on NCK & Friends blogtalk radio - 12/4/12

Discussion of spiritual motivations and consequences behind PID.

posted on Dec, 6 2012 @ 10:19 PM
Thanks Someotherguy for that link.

That radio show was a good listen, especially as a great number of issues were brought up during that interview. It seems that mainstream listeners are more open minded and aware of Paul's murder and replacement than those who group in hordes in Conspiracy forum threads. Either controversial discussion topics attract people who desire to keep a lid on anything which disrupts their illusions, and strive to maintain their personal fairy tale about what this world is all about, or there is some other motive to groups congregating to deny something as obvious as a murder of a very recognizable individual and his replacement by an extremely lame impostor.

The host of the radio show was a sensible man who was simply confronted with a considerable amount of evidence which was more than convincing enough to prove that something very fishy happened back in the 60's, and anyone with a minimum of intellectual honesty must concede that people don't simply morph in a matter of days to change head shape, facial features, physical height and psychological dispositions. If this were to occur to anyone you are familiar with in your family or among your friends, you would have to agree that they are really not the same person anymore. And you wouldn't accept the argument advanced that "of course they are the same person" simply because others who allegedly know them didn't notice the change, or for some reason you cannot know, decided not to tell anyone that they share the same conclusions as you...

Paul was swapped out, after being dealt with most violently. This corresponds to a pattern of violent control of the entire popular music industry which is used to leverage the psychic dispositions and mental orientations of much of today's youth, as was already the case back in the days when The Beatles were still alive. Many musicians were killed, and this was often passed off as drug overdoses or foolhardy accidents, as if people who had attained success and a share of glory were stupid enough to throw it all away for some cheap thrills, and this in great numbers? Not only are we to swallow that idiotic conclusion, but are we to remain blind that criminal organizations which are known to run rampant in the music industry with the mob running night clubs and concert venues, not to mention recording labels, are associated with Illuminati groups which promote a Luciferian agenda?

This is the reason so much adversity is opposed to what is simply common sense, to notice and draw minimum conclusions as to why a major celebrity was murdered, why he was replaced by an impostor, and why a large scale cover-up was orchestrated to keep the lid on this most obvious truth. That a veil of secrecy was maintained proves that organizations which murder those who speak out were involved. To my knowledge there are only three such types of organizations which could have conspired to conceal this truth. A secret service such as MI6 and/or the CIA which terminates any agents involved in information leaks, a secret society such as Freemasonry which has its own members assassinate anyone who reveals a secret, and organized crime which whacks any made man who is seen to betray the cause of 'the family'. A combination of these types of organizations is also possible, as history proves in many investigations that they are usually tolerant of one another's activities and often intermeshed with common goals and purposes.


posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 01:37 AM
NCK & Friends - blogtalk radio 12/10/12

discussion continued about PID topics related to this thread...

posted on Dec, 12 2012 @ 07:27 AM
reply to post by someotherguy

Heard it too and this radio interview ROCKED !

It would be good if somebody were able to explain WHY Faul is such a lousy impostor. My theory is that they have Cloned impostors for most people, and to convince whoever won't obey that they can be at any minute "disappeared" and REPLACED without any difficulty, they purposely used the worst possible double to replace the most famous of all 20th century personalities.

I think that this is also why FAUL continuously makes "slips of the tongue" alluding to anyone without cognitive issues that he is NOT the original Paul. This is meant as a message to anyone who isn't convinced that 'THEY' were able to pull off a stunt of such a colossal dimension...


posted on May, 20 2013 @ 12:09 PM
paul mccartney became neil aspinall, the fifth beatle who 'died' not
so long ago. as with the jfk'assassination', all anyone is ever encouraged to
talk about is how and why they die, and not if the buggers ever even died in the first place!
(and neither bugger did!!!!).

it's all theatre!

posted on May, 21 2013 @ 01:24 AM
reply to post by OutonaLimb

Hi OutonaLimb,

We can all agree that you really went way out on a limb this time, with the rather difficult to understand claim that Neil Aspinall is in fact the original James Paul McCartney in disguise. This is hardly conceivable, not because it would not be possible, but because their physical characteristics are not identical.

Of course we'd all like to believe that somehow Paul managed to escape death and was allowed to somehow survive under another identity. Who wouldn't? However, it is wishful thinking and Neil Asquith is quite a different person biologically speaking. Furthermore, he does not appear to have been switched out, or if he was they used a very good body double. I find no evidence of foul play in his case, although his role as producer of Apple Records was probably foul play at work.

FAUL McCartney with Neil Aspinall in 1969

Neil Aspinall in the sixties

If nothing else we can note a very different brow line which is a very hard bone which could not readily be surgically modified. This brow line is still the same in the older Neil Aspinall making him quite likely to be the original individual and certainly extremely unlikely to have been replaced by a person with James Paul McCartney's bone structure. I am sorry to disappoint you, and do not condemn you for speculating about possible hypotheses. However, the more open minded we are, the more rigorous we must remain when examining data and validating or falsifying our speculative explorations.



posted on May, 21 2013 @ 02:11 AM

Doctored pictures vs facial details?...

More evidence than you can shake a macca at.

Leave Paul alone, and deny ignorance!

But so what if he was, what do you plan to do about it? I think you'll have a slightly difficult time trying to convince those that know him that he's dead.

edit on 5/21/2013 by ANOK because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 21 2013 @ 11:40 AM
Forensic scientists have proven Paul was replaced. And being experts, they can actually tell when photos have been doctored. Whoever was behind the impostor-replacement deception started doctoring pictures of Faul & Paul immediately. For more on all of this, see the Plastic Macca blog

What are we going to do about it? For now, it's enough to expose the fraud.

posted on May, 21 2013 @ 03:19 PM
reply to post by someotherguy

Yet your "experts" were proven to be frauds, many years ago, who use doctored pics.

That video is not doctored pics. The details it shows proves Macca is still Macca.

Not only that but how do you explain all his relatives, friends, business partners, casual acquaintances? Are they all in on it also? If it's so obvious to you, surely someone close to him would notice Macca wasn't Macca?

PID is not logical in anyway whatsoever.

posted on May, 22 2013 @ 01:46 AM
reply to post by ANOK

Hi Anok,

Is Turkish intelligence still working with the CIA? Just asking...

We do know that the CIA was complicit with at minimum the cover-up of Paul's assassination, if not directly involved with his disappearance on the US West Coast. Is there also a Turkish connection, or just in the cover-up of the aftermath? Thanks for letting us know from your oriental perspective.


posted on May, 23 2013 @ 05:07 AM

Originally posted by Getsmart
We do know that the CIA was complicit with at minimum the cover-up of Paul's assassination, if not directly involved with his disappearance on the US West Coast. Is there also a Turkish connection, or just in the cover-up of the aftermath? Thanks for letting us know from your oriental perspective.

LOL no, no you don't.

Turkish Delight?

What oriental perspective?

You know Maccas on tour right now? He plays in Austin tonight, at the Frank Erwin Events Center. It's a world tour, not bad for an old guy lol.

All those people paying to see a fake eh? You should keep quiet about this, it might upset a lot of people, a lot of the wrong people, if you get my gist?

edit on 5/23/2013 by ANOK because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 23 2013 @ 05:29 PM

Originally posted by ANOK

Wow, that picture's the clincher. It can't be Paul, his eyes don't look right!

posted on Aug, 6 2013 @ 12:21 PM

Originally posted by someotherguy
Forensic scientists have proven Paul was replaced. And being experts, they can actually tell when photos have been doctored. Whoever was behind the impostor-replacement deception started doctoring pictures of Faul & Paul immediately. For more on all of this, see the Plastic Macca blog

What are we going to do about it? For now, it's enough to expose the fraud.

False. It was just an article in a pop-culture magazine. Not a science journal and not peer reviewed. Even the "experts" admit they didn't prove anything.

posted on Sep, 21 2013 @ 02:14 PM
Guys and gals (erm...if it is possible for girls to spend inordinate amounts of time questioning The Cute One), I would first of all like to self-identify as neither a PID nor PIA but as an agent of PIMP (Paul is Mainly Paul), an occult cabal which likes to give away the fact that we have a set mission to go in search of stuff that makes us LOL. YOU GUYS have really added to our ever-growing ecstasy with 64 pages of solid nuttwuff (the origins of this compliment are extremely obscure but there is no doubt that something which is 'nuttwuff' is likely to be crunchly.)

The thing is that PIDers can't be done for libel because there is no Faul McCartney.
Which means that it is also over for the PIAers.

Please now proceed to the exit and board the bus headed for 'A LIFE'.

Thank you for your co-operation

posted on Sep, 26 2013 @ 03:43 PM
reply to post by Vermouthian

Hi Vermouthian,

You are indeed as smooth as a good Vermouth, with definite merits even if I prefer not to cook my wine. For what it's worth, some of us do have a life indeed, but find it useful to alert others to crimes whenever there is evidence of them. This will not be the first unsolved murder to elicit public interest, nor the last. However, it is our duty to our fellow man to alert society to criminal enterprises and organized deception.

More specifically regarding Paul's replacement, you may wish to take a gander at Sir Faul McCartney in prior times. In fact he was quite as much a bufoon as the current version. It was this individual's murder and replacement by a Clone which prompted me to investigate the replacement campaign of high profile individuals by Clones. Here is some visual evidence of this, as all who have at least a modicum of honest will recognize an earlier Clone rendition of Sir Faul. In this instance, he replace a famous Actor and Clown working the British stage in the early 19th century. The image you will see below is drawn from the Frontispiece of a work edited by Charles Dickens under his pen name Boz, after Joseph Grimaldi's death. The person represented is not Joseph Grimaldi but portrays his impostor replacement, a Clone who didn't look any more like Grimaldi than Sir Faul looks like the original James Paul McCartney.

For more information on this interesting story, you shall have to log into the thread below at page 17 for fuller details and many other portraits of the interested parties, entered in visual evidence. However, due to the popularity of these revelations, they can only be viewed early in the month, until a way is found to fund the hosting account anonymously.

Link to post about Sir Faul being a 2nd Edition Replacement Clone


posted on Sep, 26 2013 @ 06:03 PM
JPM wasn't replaced by a clone b/c Faul doesn't look enough like the original to fool the masses even in the late 60's - before the Internet made it easy to compare pictures & videos. If JPM had been replaced by a clone, probably no one would have noticed... Creepy to contemplate.

The thing is that PIDers can't be done for libel because > the Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. It has been proven by forensic science that JPM was replaced in 1966.

EDIT: Faul may very well be a clone of someone else other than the original Beatle Paul.
edit on 26-9-2013 by someotherguy because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 1 2013 @ 12:34 AM
For Your Information

The link I posted above is now active, given we are at the beginning of a new month. I shall work out funding that account anonymously so that the images shown don't vanish due to bandwidth limitations. Someotherguy is quite right, that James Paul McCartney was not replaced by a Clone of himself. For if that had been done it would have been extremely hard to identify the double as an impostor, given a far greater physical resemblance.

No, in fact, James Paul McCartney was replaced by a rather different looking individual. In this instance he was replaced by a person who was not an original naturally born human, but by a cabal engineered and mind controllled Clone of the Emperor Justinian. Why the loonies who like to mess with our public mind and the messages to which we are exposed resort to such twisted stratagems is beyond understanding. However, the evidence is there. You will note that this is not the first time they have done this. The very same murder and replacement scenario was undertaken in the 19th century. Another eminent personality was eliminated and replaced by another Clone of the same character, Justinian. Check the above link for further evidence.

PS. To my knowledge, the original James Paul McCartney was not cloned.

posted on Nov, 27 2013 @ 11:58 AM
JPM wanted to help get the word out about JFK assassination story being BS.

Paul McCartney, Conspiracy Theorist

posted on Nov, 27 2013 @ 03:38 PM
JPM Hoped to Expose JFK Assassination Lies

top topics

<< 61  62  63    65 >>

log in