They were retained in custody in Canada at least until Wednesday October 27th although on the previous Friday they had been officially released with $10 000 bail. This can only be explained as a discreet measure of "protective custody" so as not to directly accuse the US authorities of criminal misconduct and to avoid taking a political stand by granting them official refugee status. They must have advanced some seriously convincing arguments to get the Canadian justice system to refrain from obeying the imperative demands for their extradition.
"He told a Vancouver news conference that there is a "bottom-feeding conspiracy" out to get him but, unlike previous vague accusations, this time he publicly named three Hollywood lawyers as the conspirators.
Quaid, 60, said the lawyers, who once worked for him, employed "fake loans," "bogus corporations" and a "phoney probate file" in their conspiracy.
"They conspired to steal my property and money by gaining access to my revenue streams," said Quaid, speaking in the calm, assured tones he has used in his distinguished film roles. "Assets and royalties were misappropriated."
Quaid said he has made $40 million in his acting career, but court records show he filed for bankruptcy in 2000. The file has since been closed.
He said there was a "monstrous" and "merciless" plot to "murder me."
Speaking for himself and his wife, Evi Quaid, who accompanied him into Canada last week, Quaid said: "We are not criminals or fugitives from justice. We're not crazy."
Quaid's new allegations included cross words for his actor-brother, Dennis Quaid, whom he said "made matters worse" by buying a property he once owned.
He also brought other famous names into his tale, claiming singer Britney Spears and actors Lindsay Lohan and Mel Gibson are also victims of attempts to get "at their money."
SOURCE: click this link
It is interesting to note that he refers to at least 3 other celebrities being targeted by similar mechanisms whereby criminal lawyers use bogus corporations to seize assets and capture revenue streams. Added to that there is, according to Randy Quaid, a "monstruous and merciless plot to murder me".
Researchers into the wrongful death of Paul McCartney will not fail to observe this connection between managerial and legal appropriation of assets and revenues prior to the physical elimination of a celebrity. Whether they are replaced or not will possibly depend upon whether their position is to be leveraged for influence purposes in propaganda programs and/or for further revenue generation on false pretenses by the fraudulent use of a celebrity impostor sold to the public as the original McCoy.
This means that the judicial trail to follow should come from a FORENSIC ACCOUNTING analysis of the assets and revenues of The Beatles in the 1960's at which time their properties and income were probably illegally seized by corporate lawyers exploiting loopholes in the system and creating mechanisms of economic spoliation. Who ran Apple Records, what were exactly in the corporate texts and what was the fine print in the contracts? Because prior to a contract killing they apparently first ensure that the other contracts are in proper disorder.
That Randy Quaid slightly modified his original statement, making it more clearly targeted at the legal henchmen used by the Hollywood Mafia of CIA Mass Media Murderers, is probably not due to it being any less true that there is an organized widespread program of killing uncooperative Stars, but because it is easier to prove in court the misdeeds of specific individuals and their complicit role in aspects of the case than to prove a broader conspiracy. Theirs today is now a judicial battle which must follow the slow routine of plucking through trace elements of evidence without making the larger jump to hypothesizing about more extensive networks of corruption and criminal enterprise. After all, who could believe in the existence of organized crime in a place like Los Angeles, which never had even so much as a trace of gang warfare or drug trafficking? Who could imagine that anyone would want to use the Movies as a propaganda medium, after all, only the US Army would be so dumb!
Hollywood, The Pentagon And Washington: The Movies And National Security
GS
