When researching Chemtrails, I keep coming up with the term "aerosol forcing".
Indirect Aerosol Forcing
Crowley (1) used estimates of radiative forcing, together with an energy balance model, to estimate the temperature response to variations in volcanic
emissions, solar irradiance, increases in greenhouse gases, and aerosol forcing. He did not account for the indirect effects of aerosols, because
evaluations by the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) indicated that confidence in estimates of this forcing was very low [p. 272 of
(1)]. We believe, however, that such an omission could lead to large systematic errors
Aerosol Forcing means to introduce an aerosol into the atmosphere, that is not there naturally.
An aerosol can be defined as a dispersion of solid and liquid particles suspended in gas
When sulfate (SO4-2) and nitrate (NO3-) containing aerosols are incorporated into cloud droplets, they lead to acidic deposition, often hundreds of
miles away from the source of the aerosols or precursor gases. Although aerosols are produced by myriad natural processes, human activities are
responsible for generating much of the aerosol load in today's atmosphere.
Insoluble aerosols include metal oxides, silicates, and clay minerals (all 3 derived from soil dust or volcanoes).
Sulfates and Nitrates could be largely attributed to aircraft. And the metal oxides could
be attributed to weather modification/cloud
One scientific report states;
Radiative forcing from contrails from the proposed HSCT fleet may therefore be neglected in future scenarios of radiative forcing
What is an HSCT fleet. High Speed Civilian Transport.
Back in 1996, McDonnell Douglas Corporation created two supersonic commercial air traffic networks consisting of origin-destination city pair routes
and associated traffic levels. Source
This opened up flight paths for the HSCT that mimic regular commercial flight plaths.
In fact, it required some commercial flight paths to be re-routed to make way for the HSCT. They call it Airspace Charging.
Evidence suggests that differences in airspace charging rates are significantly influencing airline routes and flight plans through European airspace.
The resulting changes in routings can extend flight distances by up to 20% compared to shortest routes.
So, they are directly affecting the
albedo of earth
and causing all
sorts of health effects and man and animal and plants.
Since the atmosphere settles into the water, the water is being poisoned.
They needed to understand just how much they are affecting things, so on 9/11/2001, they created a false terrorist attack from the air to shut down
all commercial traffic to study the difference.
It's a tricky business making people sick but not causing suspicion, so the Chemtrail concoction took decades to perfect.
So, debunkers. I'm respect your right to think nothing is happening, but you will not change my mind, so don't try. This thread is to explore this
aerosol forcing issue.
If you have a link showing these are/aren't coming from contrails, it would be good to review. I will tell you, there is a ton of evidence supporting
the link between "aerosol forcing" and "contrail emissions"
The effects of aerosol particles from aircraft emissions on clouds are more complicated because nucleation and subsequent growth of ice crystals that
make up cirrus clouds are more complex and less studied than for water clouds.
[edit on 19-9-2009 by kingswillquiver]