It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ZombieOctopus
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Here you have Iran talking trash and busting it's balls to develop nuclear weapons. Then you have Israel, who has had nuclear weapons for several years and hasn't used them. Get real!
Oh I see. So if Iran can show they've had nuclear weapons for years, that's no problem then. Do nuclear weapons have some kind of break in period? Like after 5 or 10 years they aren't dangerous to the security of the free world anymore? North Korea has had nuclear weapons since the start of the decade, does that mean they're no longer a threat?
[edit on 9/18/2009 by ZombieOctopus]
UNITED NATIONS, Sept 11 (Reuters) - The United States has drafted a U.N. Security Council resolution calling on all countries with atomic weapons to get rid of them, a text Washington hopes will be approved by a special council session presided over by U.S. President Barack Obama.
The 15-nation council will debate the draft resolution on Sept. 24 on the sidelines of the annual meeting of the General Assembly, where Obama is making his debut appearance at the United Nations. Washington holds the rotating presidency of the Security Council during September.
the document, which "expresses concern about the Israeli nuclear capabilities," and links it to "concern about the threat posed by the proliferation of nuclear weapons for the security and stability of the Middle East."
But chief Iranian delegate Ali Asghar Soltanieh said the vote should serve as a warning to Washington and other supporters of the Jewish state.
"The US Administration .... has received a message that they should not continue supporting Israel at any price," he told reporters.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I would sleep better knowing NO ONE had nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by digger2381
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I would sleep better knowing NO ONE had nuclear weapons.
Funny that you should say this, because I would sleep better at night knowing that EVERYONE has nuclear weapons.
Mutually Assured Destruction is the only way to go, because Pandora's Box has already been opened. Even if we were able to achieve "total nuclear disarmament" you can bet your bottom dollar that somebody will keep at least one or two around.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by john124
US drafts UN resolution urging nuclear disarmament
UNITED NATIONS, Sept 11 (Reuters) - The United States has drafted a U.N. Security Council resolution calling on all countries with atomic weapons to get rid of them, a text Washington hopes will be approved by a special council session presided over by U.S. President Barack Obama.
The 15-nation council will debate the draft resolution on Sept. 24 on the sidelines of the annual meeting of the General Assembly, where Obama is making his debut appearance at the United Nations. Washington holds the rotating presidency of the Security Council during September.
[edit on 18-9-2009 by SLAYER69]
Originally posted by john124
countries like Iran and N.Korea will have to agree, otherwise there'll be consequences for them.
Originally posted by sanchoearlyjones
reply to post by john124
The UN has been the main mechanism of control, and manipulation of the World for a very long time. It is the prime mechanism used as an excuse in Iraq. Now I am guessing due to internal conflicts with the Elite We are able to use somewhat unaltered information, or reports that cast a better shadow, and peace outlook for the World. Your argument is weak for the very fact of the People You call anti "Israel" are nothing more than "peace mongers". We aren't anti Israel, but anti Zionism; which transcends Religion, and race.
Originally posted by john124
Since Israel is a secular state, then any argument against them having nuclear weapons is not anti-zionist, it's anti-Israel.
Originally posted by sanchoearlyjones
reply to post by john124
Huh, seems that warrenb pointed out that Israel is not 100% Jewish. I know Zionism runs deep throughout the World.......Christian Zionism is rampant in the States. Biden, and Tom Delay amongst others claim to be proud Zionists.
So, I definitely have a different view than You. That being said, Your argument has gone from weak to biased.
You in short order said whatever Israel, or the States deem credible at the time is the only truth..... The UN can be useful at times, but currently is only corrupt, and full of bad reviews...................... that's basically what You said, do You realize how deranged that makes You sound????
Foaming at the Mouth for Peace Sancho
Originally posted by ZombieOctopus
Originally posted by john124
Since Israel is a secular state, then any argument against them having nuclear weapons is not anti-zionist, it's anti-Israel.
Zionism has nothing to do with religion, it's a right-wing nationalist ideology.
You can be a Zionist and not be an Orthodox Jew if you want...
"When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle." Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces, New York Times, 14 April 1983.