It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is the AntiChrist real

page: 3
2
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 12:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Myrtales Instinct

Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
reply to post by pasttheclouds
 


What does truth mean to you Myrtals?

Is it not "the truth" that sets us free?
Is it not the glue which holds "the way" and "the life" together?


I ask again, seeking a foundation to build each other up on IN TRUTH. If we can find the truth (which is done in the light nor hidden since the foundation of the world) we will also see "the way" and "the life" together even now.

What is truth? Are we not all "close pressed" translated Pontius Pilate?


Truth is knowing God - intimately. What do I mean by this? Well, it's just what it implies. The way is the pathway to God. Those who follow Jesus' teachings will find the way because he is the Messiah, and he personally seen to it, to fulfull God's will that we all have direct access to the Father. Jesus did this by going to the cross. It had to be done this way because the first resurrection, that we are supposed to experience while we are alive on this earth, basically mimics Christ going to the cross.

We have to consider, that the old way to have access to God was through the temple in Jerusalem. The old temple had an outer court, an inner court and the Holy of Holies. Our bodies being new temples are no different. If we were to lay out the temple design on our own bodies, the outer court would be our legs down to our feet, the inner court would be our body and the Holy of Holies would be placed where our head/mind is.

There are five mysteries:

1 Baptism - outer court
2. Chrism - inner court
3. Eucharist - inner court
4. Redemption - inner court
5. Bridal Chamber - Holy of Holies

The veil (like a brides veil) was torn open, the moment that Jesus died giving us access into knowing the sacred things.

To go from the outer court into the inner court we repent. True sincere repentance brings the chrism and now one would be getting into the baptism, that John the Baptist said would come from Jesus of spirit and fire.

Shall I go on?



When Jesus was speaking with the Pharisees and Saducees about the temple, was he speaking of the building or of his body?

Let me ask you this.

Why was the "High priest" aka "Father" only able to enter into the "holy of holies" once a year to make intercession for the people? Why only once a year?




posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 12:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by badmedia
reply to post by soul of integrity
 


The problem with what you are doing with those words is you are just playing on the words of 1 single language and pronunciation.


from my perspective, only one language exists




Such is a deception in itself. Completely playing on words to make them mean whatever you want.



not "playing" on words to make them mean whatever i want. wasn't language here before i was? i'm just demonstrating how you and everyone i know is actively participating in the encryption and encoding of all words, all languages.

if the burden of proof you choose to require of me is that i demonstrate the same principals to all words, all languages, then you ask me to learn how to read, write, and speak all words in all languages.

now in order for you to believe me, you also will have to have knowledge of "other languages", how to read, write, and speak them.

so, what language shall we begin with?
how about the one we have already agreed upon, and are currently having a discussion in?

sounds fair enough to me, how about you?

example #1:
-when i think of las vegas i think of gambling and casinos.
-when i look up the definition of gambling it says it is not a sure bet, but rather a vague guess
-when i think of losing because of a vague guess i think:
-loss vague guess is pronounced the same way as las vegas.
-las vegas was named before i got here, by your kind, and your language

please show me where i have lied or deceived you. point to the fiction.

example #2
-when i think of egypt i think of the pyramids
-when i think of the pyramids i think of the big blocks of rock
-when i think of the big blocks of rock i think of the guy chipping away at it
-when i think "he chipped" i think it sounds like "egypt"
-egypt was named before i got here, by your kind, and your language

please show me where i have lied or decieved you. point to the fiction.

example #3
-when i think of this computer i'm using i think of all the information we put on it, which is why they were invented in the first place, to store information.
-when i think of how much information people put on computers, i think "come put here" the information.
-when i look at "come put here" i can see a resemblance to com put er.

please show me the flaw in logic here. show me where i have lied. point to the fiction.

but things are encrypted and encoded many different ways.
look at your kinds greatest achievments and what you call them regardless of the language:

pyramids originally called: "mr" (mere)
first spacestation called: "mir" (mere)
king of beasts lion says: "roar" aka : "me roar"
i don't call it a "mirror", i'm lazy, i pronounce it "mere" with last e silent

spell things out phonetically and reverse or mirror image them and i consistantly find truisms encrypted and encoded into the words

example #4:
-number one cause of air pollution on earth = automobiles
- "see i fart" can be written as "c i fart"
- reversed "c i fart" is "traf i c"
- when i combine "traf i c" i get "trafic"
- what possible purpose is there for 2 fs??? one wasn't enough?
- trafic is pronounced the same as traffic

example #5:
- tough lads = tuf lad = lad tuf
- lad tuf [mirror] fut bal
- "oo" can make the same sound as "u"
- foot bal = football, played by lads who are tough/tuff

i'm not lying to you. i'm demonstrating how your kind are encrypting and encoding words.

example #6:
- god put adam in the garden to name things
- man [mirror] nam
- nam plus a silent e = name
- name = nam
- nam [mirror] man

example #7:
- eden can be pronounced edun, webster's depicts 2nd e upside down which represents "unnaccented vowels in syllables"
- edun [mirror] nude

example #8:
- shower [mirror] rewosh = rewash, and i re-wash the same parts as last time

example #9:
- trophy = trofe
- trofe [mirror] efort = effort
- a trophy is nothing more than proof of an effort

example #10:
- boots [mirror] stood
- boots can stand, stood, are standing

example #11:
- first thing an infant puts in it's lips (one lip that is round) is:
- in lip [reverse sequence of letters in each syllable) =
- ni pil , pronounced same way as nipple

point out my lie. show me where i have decieved you.

example #12:
-bird and bees [mirror/reversed/mirror] =
-seed dna brid , one e away from being my "seed dna bride" which is to say my seed's dna and my bride, referring to the birds and the bees....

example #13:
-vampires do not like garlic.
-vampires represent rage manifested
- kill rage phonetically = cil rag
- cilrag [mirror] garlic

this isn't something i am making up.

it is something i was born into. but, after seeing thousands of examples in many languages, i've seen enough to convince me. so, i share these truism with you. whether it's true to you or not, isn't up to me. it's up to you. how many examples would you like? different languages???

example #14:
- all other nations on earth that consider china in diplomatic relations consider them because they are the most populated.
- i'm sure (i know) america considers china a nich when developing their foriegn policies, esp in the region (n. korea)
- china [mirror] anich = a nich

what different languages?

tower of babel?
- written by moses
- moses from egypt
- great pyramid biggest building in egypt
- built by "kufu / cheops
- kufu cheops [mirror] spoech ufuk
- i don't want to offend or break terms agreement here, so perhaps you'll have to figure that one out for yourself.

- kufu cheops (2 names accredited to pharoah who built it in legend/myth/history, kufu is egyptian, cheops was greek name)

--------------------------

i'll leave you with a simple one the ladies might appreciate:
in order to become a father, he needed to make her fat, fat her ... father.

like a male god would create a male for company.
how gay is that
father?
fat her
maybe, just maybe, god has a fem side ....

i promise you, i don't believe i'm lying to you.

i have a deep seeded affinity for maintaining my integrity.
hence, the screen name i have chosen

i'm a little tired
i'll come back later and give some more examples.

thanks,
john paul



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 12:39 AM
link   
reply to post by badmedia
 


good explanation.

i've come across many different explanations to the same riddle, or variations of it.

your logic is sound in your rebuttal, no arguement, however ...
there are other solutions available to the perception of the conflict.

just because you find one sollution to the percieved conflict, doesn't mean that other sollutions did not exist, or do not exist.

just because you find a solution to the problem (any problem), doesn't mean a better solution to the problem didn't exist. but, based upon the facts you've gathered you decide on a solution that works.



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 12:52 AM
link   
reply to post by soul of integrity
 


Isn't it funny how we languish in language?

Isis watt yahu ra saying. Eye fall low ewe.

Gog El and Yahoo due two.

[edit on 21-9-2009 by letthereaderunderstand]



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 12:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by soul of integrity
 


Im actually responding to sly here in the post that he said the other books are not the Bible>>>>>>>>>



???sly???

other books not bible?

either a typo, or i was misunderstood

from my perspective that which created all has a hand in all creation and all that exists.

to think anything is seperated from that which resides everywhere is the equivalent of already having stood before the throne and asked god:

"can you escort me to where i would be if i were without you?"

question must have been asked, and a perspective that god isn't somewhere is the assumption god isn't everywhere. can you have it both ways?

i believe truth is present in all that exists.
to think otherwise is to believe god creates what is not true.

this is where i stand on the issue.
i find as much truth in other sources as i do the bible.
actually, i find far more truth in all other sources because i believe the bible.



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 12:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
reply to post by soul of integrity
 


Isn't it funny how we languish in language?


example # ???

jew, god's nail =
jew g nal [mirror] lan g wej = langwej = language

"in the beginning there was the word, and the word was with god"



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 01:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by soul of integrity

Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
reply to post by soul of integrity
 


"in the beginning there was the word, and the word was with god"



The name only you know...

and brought them unto Adam(Mankind) to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam(Mankind) called every living creature, that was the name thereof.



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 01:33 AM
link   
reply to post by letthereaderunderstand
 


i like.

example #16
- go plus spell = gospell



i'm tired



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 01:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by soul of integrity
reply to post by letthereaderunderstand
 


i like.

example #16
- go plus spell = gospell



i'm tired


Now it's time to say good night
Good night Sleep tight
Now the sun turns out his light
Good night Sleep tight
Dream sweet dreams for me
Dream sweet dreams for you.

Close your eyes and I'll close mine
Good night Sleep tight
Now the moon begins to shine
Good night Sleep tight
Dream sweet dreams for me
Dream sweet dreams for you.

Close your eyes and I'll close mine
Good night Sleep tight
Now the sun turns out his light
Good night Sleep tight
Dream sweet dreams for me
Dream sweet dreams for you.

Good night Good night Everybody
Everybody everywhere
Good night......

The Beatles = The Baetlys meaning "the rock" my church is built on.

Peace is your Piece



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 01:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by soul of integrity
from my perspective, only one language exists


And that is why you are wrong. 1. Because you are only looking at things from your own perspective, and because 2 language is used to express things, but is not the actual thing itself.

Just as 1+1=2 is an expression/language, but the understanding is something there which can't really be shared, only expressed.

Thus, to even think about the literal words and symbols at all in the manner in which you do is a falsehood in itself. It's the meaning behind them that always matters, not how you can mix up words, or how you want to make them sound.



not "playing" on words to make them mean whatever i want. wasn't language here before i was? i'm just demonstrating how you and everyone i know is actively participating in the encryption and encoding of all words, all languages.


You pretend to know me?



if the burden of proof you choose to require of me is that i demonstrate the same principals to all words, all languages, then you ask me to learn how to read, write, and speak all words in all languages.


The burden of proof is to show understanding in what you want to say, rather than moving the order of letters around to portray something as being a certain thing.



now in order for you to believe me, you also will have to have knowledge of "other languages", how to read, write, and speak them.


If you were true you wouldn't ask me to believe you. You would point me in the direction of understanding so that I could see for myself. This world doesn't need another "the truth as according to X", it needs understanding.



so, what language shall we begin with?
how about the one we have already agreed upon, and are currently having a discussion in?

sounds fair enough to me, how about you?


It's not really going to matter. Because you are full of it, and I will point it out for what it is. If you have a point to make, then make it. If you just want to try and mix the letters of words around as a way of "being on to something", then you have about as much pull as someone using numerology to make everything they don't like come out as 666.



example #1:
-when i think of las vegas i think of gambling and casinos.
-when i look up the definition of gambling it says it is not a sure bet, but rather a vague guess
-when i think of losing because of a vague guess i think:
-loss vague guess is pronounced the same way as las vegas.
-las vegas was named before i got here, by your kind, and your language

please show me where i have lied or deceived you. point to the fiction.


Because "loss and vague" are english words. las vegas is a spanish word, which translates to "The Meadows".

But you are just using the words to make las vegas bad in your opinion. Not that I disagree with the sentiment, but the reason why it is bad has nothing to do with what you are pointing out. It's bad because it's a greedy city, and the entire city is designed to take as much money as possible from tourists. And that is the valid reasons to point out, because then people are talking about understanding, and that understanding can be found elsewhere outside just las vegas.




example #2
-when i think of egypt i think of the pyramids
-when i think of the pyramids i think of the big blocks of rock
-when i think of the big blocks of rock i think of the guy chipping away at it
-when i think "he chipped" i think it sounds like "egypt"
-egypt was named before i got here, by your kind, and your language

please show me where i have lied or decieved you. point to the fiction.


You are really annoying me with the "your kind" crap. You are using it as a way of implying superiority, and that it is "my fault" the words are like such. I have little to no use for such things. If you are superior to "my kind" as you put it, then show me true riches - understanding and wisdom. Now how you can make names sound like other things.




example #3
-when i think of this computer i'm using i think of all the information we put on it, which is why they were invented in the first place, to store information.
-when i think of how much information people put on computers, i think "come put here" the information.
-when i look at "come put here" i can see a resemblance to com put er.

please show me the flaw in logic here. show me where i have lied. point to the fiction.


The entire thing is a fiction. Computer is based on the word "compute". Which has it's own meaning, it means to calculate and do math. A computer is a machine that computes things.



but things are encrypted and encoded many different ways.
look at your kinds greatest achievments and what you call them regardless of the language:

pyramids originally called: "mr" (mere)
first spacestation called: "mir" (mere)
king of beasts lion says: "roar" aka : "me roar"
i don't call it a "mirror", i'm lazy, i pronounce it "mere" with last e silent

spell things out phonetically and reverse or mirror image them and i consistantly find truisms encrypted and encoded into the words


A rose by any other name still smells the same. You are putting the importance into the symbols, rather than the meanings.



example #4:
-number one cause of air pollution on earth = automobiles
- "see i fart" can be written as "c i fart"
- reversed "c i fart" is "traf i c"
- when i combine "traf i c" i get "trafic"
- what possible purpose is there for 2 fs??? one wasn't enough?
- trafic is pronounced the same as traffic


:shk:



i'm not lying to you. i'm demonstrating how your kind are encrypting and encoding words.


Here with the your kind again. And you are lying to me, when words are "decoded" they are decoded into meaning. What a word means, not what it sounds like among other words in which you then use to imply meaning.

Rather than someone taking the word for what it means, you are telling me I am to listen to what the word loosely sounds like, and then use those words to get meaning. It is a manipulation on the words to derive meaning you want.



i promise you, i don't believe i'm lying to you.


Doesn't matter if you believe you are or not.



i have a deep seeded affinity for maintaining my integrity.
hence, the screen name i have chosen


But do you pretend to have it, or do you really have it? I don't know what you believe, outside apparently thinking you are unlike me in some physical manner. But the manner in which you are presenting things is manipulative in nature, and not about real truth.



Proverbs 9:10 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding.


Understanding, not plays on words and riddles. Plays on words and riddles are what people who decieve use. Ever seen Dave Chappelle? You might not be a "deciever", but you sure got the uniform on.



i'm a little tired
i'll come back later and give some more examples.


Don't bother on my account. It's in 1 ear and out the other with me. I'm about growing and sharing understanding, not so much on how you can make words sound to promote a bias.



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 01:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by soul of integrity

Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by soul of integrity
 


Im actually responding to sly here in the post that he said the other books are not the Bible>>>>>>>>>



???sly???

other books not bible?

either a typo, or i was misunderstood

from my perspective that which created all has a hand in all creation and all that exists.

to think anything is seperated from that which resides everywhere is the equivalent of already having stood before the throne and asked god:

"can you escort me to where i would be if i were without you?"

question must have been asked, and a perspective that god isn't somewhere is the assumption god isn't everywhere. can you have it both ways?

i believe truth is present in all that exists.
to think otherwise is to believe god creates what is not true.

this is where i stand on the issue.
i find as much truth in other sources as i do the bible.
actually, i find far more truth in all other sources because i believe the bible.


I like this....Bible means Book.

Check this out Sly....written before the publication of a "Bible".

All means ALL.

2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 01:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by soul of integrity
reply to post by badmedia
 


good explanation.

i've come across many different explanations to the same riddle, or variations of it.

your logic is sound in your rebuttal, no arguement, however ...
there are other solutions available to the perception of the conflict.

just because you find one sollution to the percieved conflict, doesn't mean that other sollutions did not exist, or do not exist.



There is no perception of the conflict. The riddle presents false information, and you repeated that to me as a way of claiming math and understanding is satanic.

You said $27+$2 = $29 and that is false. But it was a falsehood because the $27 already had the $2 added to it, and then the riddle pretends the $2 still needs to be added. It doesn't, it's the $3 the people got back that is needed to be added to the $27.

It's completely false, there is no perception in which it is true.



just because you find a solution to the problem (any problem), doesn't mean a better solution to the problem didn't exist. but, based upon the facts you've gathered you decide on a solution that works.


I'm a programmer, and there are a ton of different ways in which you can make a program work or do the same exact job.

However, the understanding of math behind them remains constant. What you presented was false in understanding and is false in all perceptions.

Live and Learn is my philosophy. Not a big deal to make such a mistake, or get bitten by such a riddle. But please don't sit here and make excuses for it, and please don't try and use such riddles on me in the future as a way of trying to trip me up and make false claims - such as math is a construct of satan and is evil and a lie. To admit the error and fix that mistake - that is integrity.


Please, drop the smoke and mirrors and just say what you mean/understand.



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 02:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
All means ALL.

2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:


And then you just get into the neverending loop:

How do you know that is true? Because the bible says so.

Who do you know the bible is true? Because the bible is the word of god.

How do you know that is true? Because the bible says so.

Rinse and Repeat. And then eventually it gets into a faith thing, which isn't faith at all, but blind acceptance.

How do you know that when that was written, which scriptures he is talking about? How do we know some haven't been added, and some haven't been taken out?

How do we know that some books weren't added later that were used to manipulate the previous meanings?

How do we know if peoples way of interrupting things is correct at all?

And so you might say, well the holy spirit. And then I must ask - then why do you need the bible, when the holy spirit is the thing which actually brings you the understanding needed? Or is the holy spirit just something that repeats the bible to people?

So why did the scriptures we know today get to be this authority of god? Because everyone who didn't go along with it was killed if possible. In public, in front of everyone in torturous ways. Is it any wonder this version became the official version?

The only way people can know if 1+1=2 is true and 4-3=3 is false is if they have understanding. And that understanding says the bible is wrong in places, and in others it's so right on a deep level it's breathe taking.

However, I must say that in some respects the statement is actually true. But on this level, you get to where all things serve the will of the father, both good and evil, and so it's justified on the same level as evil - as a learning tool, rather than being right. To be the black background that makes the white light stand out to lead people and so forth. I find it contains both what I am to do and follow(Jesus), and then also an example of what I am shown not to do(Paul, the church and religion). Thus, you get a learning tool, a foundation for times when things like the internet didn't exist. But to elevate that to the "word of god" and 100% true all over, well then you are putting your foundation(bible) in the place of the roof(god), and your house will fall. Thus, the problem of pharisees sitting in the seat of moses.

But I don't get the feeling it is in that manner that you present that verse.




Matthew 7

28And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings, the people were astonished at his doctrine:

29For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes.



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 02:46 AM
link   
reply to post by badmedia
 


Etymology....the history of a word.

I've seen people say that what the Hebrew and Greek mean make no difference because they feel that "Gods word" would never be mistranslated.

Only they call to "God" which means "Good luck" and if you read scripture, that's a no no on the living ones list.

I wonder if any of those people ever read the verses...

Mat 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

or this

Isa 28:13 But the word of the LORD was unto them precept upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken.

I wonder if any of those people know what "tense" means to the scripture. If they did, they would know that Christ is going to the cross...the very reason it is said, "forgive them for they know not what they are doing".

They would know what the "Chief" in Chief builder means and that they are them.

They would know that scripture is living and not some story of people, but of characters of people.

They would understand why God honors no man, rather those doing his will, since his name is a verb and not a noun.

Alas, they are content having a man use the doctrines of men to teach them following blindly behind the blind leading them under the image that is given life on the "silver screen" as to even speak...(thanks Mel Gibson), the very image that they can not buy or sell with out bowing down to it.

X marks the spot...only they cast their "pearls" before swine and the swine muddy the residue.

They would know ecclesiastical means eclectic, the ones they shun. They would know that God is true and truth is not hidden nor mysterious, rather before you every day. Because they will not turn and see him, he goes to those who don't know him. They don't know him because he is one with them, so they don't distinguish him...he eats with sinners and tax collectors, whores and robbers...with them he divides the spoil.

They would know Pharisee means "religious separatist" and not be fooled thinking their "christian music" is Holy that they just bought in the church coffee shop making their temple into a den of thieves.

They would know Jew of Judah means "Celebrity", the ones who are saved in the minds of the people and loved by many of who "salvation" is. Sadly I don't know the name of the unknown soldier, but I re member Elvis, and 50,000,000 Elvis fans can't be wrong.

They would know Jesus means "Self existent salvation" who is in the flesh, again the name is a verb. It is a living name, the one who knows ALL MEN(mankind=Adumma)

They would know the truth that has not been SPOKEN in the dark since the beginning.

The would know what they already knew before they sold themselves...LIFE.

So he is saying the gospel...."Repent for the KINGDOM is AT HAND"..."Today if you would here my voice and turn that I might Heel you"....as in HEEL, STOP, GO NO FURTHER....TURN you are about to walk off a cliff following those blind leaders pushing make believe on you, promising you something they don't have and are going to stop you from having....STOP....Why should you die?

They would know the truth and be set free, but who am I? Just a man and nothing that you should notice me, but life is true for God is life as Life is God.

Understand...."My reward is with me" means "you reap what you sow"...sowing life is exactly what it means...so get to sowing, be fruitful and multiply and raise up the son of man. He wasn't speaking in the third person, he was speaking in his body....you, her, him, me, them all of us the sons of men. It is in his regeneration he will drink with you anew, a name only you know...the name you are naming your sons and daughters(only you know that name)...get to sowing and sow good seed on the only rock you know and are accountable for. Enter into the narrow gate...the hips. Let the camal through the needle...see truth as it has always been...and be blessed.

Peace



[edit on 21-9-2009 by letthereaderunderstand]



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 02:50 AM
link   
reply to post by letthereaderunderstand
 


temple = god and his body god (also named christ),
temple set up for humans:
son of man in different levels, as a group, as individual.

the highpriest once a year... a year is a symbol, connected
to the signs of heaven. which are symbols too.
Ezekiels gives us a follow up on this: the third temple:
Seven days shall they purge the altar and purify it; and they shall consecrate themselves. Atonement now in the 7, instead of one.

These seven days, and after it the peace offerings will be accepted.

Seven in the bible is not days, but a timeperiod of 7.
days will be shortened.

Symbology, but they all speak the same logic.
Build love = acceptance = understanding.
those are the mountains of Judeah.
where safety is.

Me personally i don't like tot alk to much symbology,
It will never be understood by to many people in these times,
because it always creates mystery, and avoids the most important thing,
understanding of the CORE issues. God is one is the main issue.

TO much symbology and word games take away from the message,
understanding it is good if you get a grib on the core issue,
who is god and the answer on that.

On the other hand, some people are made to understand all the symbology,
everyone has different functions in life.


[edit on 21-9-2009 by pasttheclouds]



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 03:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by pasttheclouds
reply to post by letthereaderunderstand
 


temple = god and his body god (also named christ),
temple set up for humans:
son of man in different levels, as a group, as individual.

the highpriest once a year... a year is a symbol, connected
to the signs of heaven.
Ezekiels gives us a follow up on this: the third temple:
Seven days shall they purge the altar and purify it; and they shall consecrate themselves.

These seven days, and after it the peace offerings will be accepted.

Seven in the bible is not days, but a timeperiod of 7.
days will be shortened.



One child every Nine months...once a year in the temple of the body. The high priest (the husbandman) may enter into the temple once a year, into the HOLY of HOLIES. Blood (semen) aka Shemen oil is "sprinkled" on the alter "the vulva" to make propreation or procreation for the sins of the people thus providing a "lamb" for the "passover" of judgment.

What you speak of is called a period or "Great drops of blood" and lasts 7 days, till it is cleansed.

The temple was never a building, only understood as such wrongly.

Isa 66:1 Thus said Jehovah: The heavens (where your head is at) are My throne, And the earth My footstool (what your feet walk on), Where is this--the house that ye build for Me? And where is this--the place--My rest?

Isa 45:19 Not in secret have I spoken, in a dark place of the earth, I have not said to the seed of Jacob (heel catcher), In vain seek ye Me, I am Jehovah, speaking righteousness, Declaring uprightness.

The Lord of "High Father" "Laughter" and "Heal catcher"....Father, Mother and Child....Generation to Generation forever.

Luk 8:17 for nothing is secret, that shall not become manifest, nor hid, that shall not be known, and become manifest.

Like father, like son...



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 04:03 AM
link   
right, yes,
all religions make the same mistakes as the religion they replaced.
They condemn the previous branch, "that they did not understood",
when their level does not understand the next one.

It was always the same pattern.

But it's not bad, it allows equal weights to everyone.

The pattern of history:
freedom comes up, it gets attacked, it looses, it becomes accepted. it wins.

Jacob and Esau
with his heel grasped by the hand of the second to come out
The millenium catches the heel of the first age.
free and slave, again different levels all the time.
Twilight time.


[edit on 21-9-2009 by pasttheclouds]



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 01:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by badmedia

Originally posted by soul of integrity
from my perspective, only one language exists


And that is why you are wrong. 1. Because you are only looking at things from your own perspective .....


stop projecting your character's qualities. you are wrong.

example #17:
-people feed on beef
-beef [mirror] feed



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 01:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by badmedia

originally posted by soul of integrity
i have a deep seeded affinity for maintaining my integrity.
hence, the screen name i have chosen


But do you pretend to have it, or do you really have it?



my actions and behaviors have reflected my intentions, my intentionality.
my intentionality is reflected by my priorities.
my priorities have always been the well being of others, and sharing of understanding.

i do not "pretend" to have a deep seeded affinity for being compliant with the facts. i can't "pretend" to be compliant with the facts.

i let my actions and behaviors do most the talking for me.
some say: actions talk louder than words.
some say talk is cheap, too ....

example # 18:
- talk = speach
- speach = speech
- speech [mirror] cheeps
- cheeps is plural for cheep

some say talk is cheap ..

example #19:
- an apple a day keeps the doctor away
- a pill (prescription) keeps you from having to go to the doctor
- a pill is pronounced apple

an a pill a day keeps the doctor away ...

i've read through your whole post a few times.
can't find where i was discredited, proven to be lying, or where my facts were disproven.

as for the vegas thing meaning the meadows in spanish, i told you i would be speaking to you in the language we had already agreed upon, but since you think i'm somehow lying to you, or manipulating truth ....

example #20
- gamblers' aim in vegas is to leave with a wod of cash, or plural wods
- plural is represented by "s"
- plural wod = s wod
- aim = aem (e silent)
- the aim is for plural(s) wods of cash
- plural = s
- wod = wod
- aim = aem
- swodaem [reversed] = meadows

nope, no conflict in my "theory" found here. i still found truth encoded into the words created by the souls of men and women.



posted on Sep, 21 2009 @ 01:42 PM
link   
example #21:
- in vegas blackjack is played with chips
- if you win big, then you take all your chips to the cage (money cages) and trade them in for money
- "cage called" = caj cald
- caj cald [mirror] blac jac = blackjack

example 21, blackjack, get it ???

badmedia was right. the "your kind" stuff can be abbrasive and annoying.



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join