It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by john124
www.guardian.co.uk...
National Geographic has a fascinating simulation of why the US World Trade Center towers collapsed after the planes hit them on September 11 2001.
It's part of a program investigating "science and conspiracy".
channel.nationalgeographic.com...-Videos/07095_00
Basically, it's because the fuel in the (nearly-full) tanks caught fire, which weakened the columns, which bent slightly, which meant that the roof - and other floors- fell in.
We know that from the real-life example, of course. But it's interesting to see it demonstrated here. Not, of course, that this will satisfy the wingnuts who think it was a conspiracy. Their loss.
But sometimes this is what engineering is about: figuring out why things happen after the event. (Other videos on the National Geographic site ask whether controlled demolition could have done the same job, and whether the hijacked planes were replaced by planes carrying explosives. Enjoy.)
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by jprophet420
And the OP was talking about the NIST? Or even basing his argument on the NIST? Where is that?
[edit on 20-9-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]
But sometimes this is what engineering is about: figuring out why things happen after the event. (Other videos on the National Geographic site ask whether controlled demolition could have done the same job, and whether the hijacked planes were replaced by planes carrying explosives. Enjoy.)
9/11: Missing Black Boxes in World Trade Center Attacks Found by Firefighters, Analyzed by NTSB, Concealed by FBI
Did the Bush Administration Lie to Congress and the 9/11 Commission?
Counterpunch
Dave Lindorff
December 19th, 2005
One of the more puzzling mysteries of 9-11 is what ever happened to the flight recorders of the two planes that hit the World Trade Center towers. Now it appears that they may not be missing at all.
Counterpunch has learned that the FBI has them.
Flight recorders (commonly known as black boxes, though these days they are generally bright orange) are required on all passenger planes. There are always two-a flight data recorder that keeps track of a plane's speed, altitude, course and maneuvers, and a cockpit voice recorder which keeps a continuous record of the last 30 minutes of conversation inside a plane's cockpit. These devices are constructed to be extremely durable, and are installed in a plane's tail section, where they are least likely suffer damaged on impact. They are designed to withstand up to 30 minutes of 1800-degree heat (more than they would have faced in the twin towers crashes), and to survive a crash at full speed into the ground.
All four of the devices were recovered from the two planes that hit the Pentagon and that crashed in rural Pennsylvania. In the case of American Airlines Flight 77, which hit the Pentagon, the FBI reports that the flight data recorder survived and had recoverable information, but the voice recorder was allegedly too damaged to provide any record. In the case of United Airlines Flight 93, which hit the ground at 500 mph in Pennsylvania, the situation was reversed: the voice recorder survived but the flight data box was allegedly damaged beyond recovery.
But the FBI states, and also reported to the 9-11 Commission, that none of the recording devices from the two planes that hit the World Trade Center were ever recovered.
There has always been some skepticism about this assertion, particularly as two N.Y. City firefighters, Mike Bellone and Nicholas De Masi, claimed in 2004 that they had found three of the four boxes, and that Federal agents took them and told the two men not to mention having found them. (The FBI denies the whole story.) Moreover, these devices are almost always located after crashes, even if not in useable condition (and the cleanup of the World Trade Center was meticulous, with even tiny bone fragments and bits of human tissue being discovered so that almost all the victims were ultimately identified). As Ted Lopatkiewicz, director of public affairs at the National Transportation Safety Agency which has the job of analyzing the boxes' data, says, "It's very unusual not to find a recorder after a crash, although it's also very unusual to have jets flying into buildings."
Now there is stronger evidence that something is amiss than simply the alleged non-recovery of all four of those boxes. A source at the National Transportation Safety Board, the agency that has the task of deciphering the date from the black boxes retrieved from crash sites-including those that are being handled as crimes and fall under the jurisdiction of the FBI-says the boxes were in fact recovered and were analyzed by the NTSB.
"Off the record, we had the boxes," the source says. "You'd have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here."
The official word from the NTSB is that the WTC crash site black boxes never turned up. "No recorders were recovered from the World Trade Center," says the NTSB's Lopatkiewicz. "At least none were delivered to us by the FBI." He adds that the agency has "always had a good relationship' with the FBI and that in all prior crime-related crashes or flight incidents, they have brought the boxes to the NTSB for analysis.
For its part, the FBI is still denying everything, though with curious bit of linguistic wiggle room. "To the best of my knowledge, the flight recording devices from the World Trade Center crashes were never recovered. At least we never had them," says FBI spokesman Stephen Kodak.
What the apparent existence of the black boxes in government hands means is unclear.
If the information in those boxes is recoverable, or if, as is likely, it has been recovered already, it could give crucial evidence regarding the skill of the hijacker/pilots, perhaps of their strategy, of whether they were getting outside help in guiding them to their targets, of how fast they were flying and a host of other things.
Why would the main intelligence and law enforcement arm of the U.S. government want to hide from the public not just the available information about the two hijacked flights that provided the motivation and justification for the nation's "War on Terror" and for its two wars against Afghanistan and Iraq, but even the fact that it has the devices which could contain that information? Conspiracy theories abound, with some claiming the planes were actually pilotless military aircraft, or that they had little or nothing to do with the building collapses. The easiest way to quash such rumors and such fevered thinking would be openness.
Instead we have the opposite: a dark secrecy that invites many questions regarding the potentially embarrassing or perhaps even sinister information that might be on those tapes.
www.counterpunch.org...
I realize I may get bashed for this...
This additional evidence imo, proves that the planes which impacted those buildings were not piloted by poorly trained Islamist Extremist Terrorists...
...and that in fact, the planes which impacted the twin towers were remotely piloted drone aircraft...
....and in the case of the south tower plane, a re-configured Boeing 767 not unlike the KC-767 Tanker Transport...
Boeing KC-767
The Boeing KC-767 is a military aerial refueling and strategic transport aircraft developed from the Boeing 767-200. The tanker received the designation KC-767A in 2002 after being selected by the US Air Force initially to replace older KC-135Es. In December 2003, the contract was frozen and later canceled due to corruption allegations.
The tanker is currently being developed for use by the Italian and Japanese air forces, who have ordered four tankers each.
....and the flame-flash it emits on it's right side and back from the nose at the moment the nose touched the building, shows a missile launch...
A pilot, Russ Wittenburg...
... is on record indicating that at that speed and altitute, he himself could not have controlled the plane the way it was observed being controlled on final approach to impact.
And when we look closely at ALL the available images and videos... there are indeed some very strange anomalous structures observed...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Wittenberg talks about the "5 to 6 Gs" and other nonsense...which, IF the B767 had experienced that sort of g-force, would have been an issue -- not least of which is the consciousness of the pilot -- but seeing the videos of the airplane approach and impact, there is NO SIGN of such g-forces.
And note the bending of the right wing.
Also, the plane was clocked at 550-575 MPH at what about a 1000 feet altitude.
These show the plane just ZIPPING along while performing rapid maneuvers and adjustments, and at the very final approach, a second before impact, the plane peformed a sudden turning through impact, as can be noted by the wing bending.
He is in a turn, last minute and was also pulling level from the dive. The wings flex quite a lot, next time you fly take a look. You can see the movement especially in turbulence.
P.S. What are your thoughts on the proportion comparative analysis?
One other thing - the Tanker Transport
Is a re-engineered, re-configuration of the Boeing 767.
ANd I saw adds for the Tanker Transport on Boeing website in the fall of 2002.... and presumably a prototype could have existed.
And the proportion analysis, what do you think of that?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
SOME people have seen what they thought were 'pods' on the center of the fuselage belly. They are badly mistaken. It is the paint scheme design. www.airliners.net... have many, many photos that will show what I am referring to. The lower portion dark blue of that United paint scheme does not cover the complete belly. Sections are left unpainted, and that's what looks like 'pods'.
...or the wing root fairing.