It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the twoof movement
Originally posted by Psycontagious
Let's try not putting people down, and be constructive at the same time. If you ask me, the 9/11 debates are completely pointless because neither side can convince the other after years of trying.
Originally posted by billybob
the only ones who aren't changing their stance are the hard core debunkers from mind control central, amd they already know it was an inside job, because they are in the NWO media squad.
...its said that the planes were averaging 6000 to 10000 litres...
...how much fuel on average does a plane use when taking off and during landing when reverse thrust is applied??
Originally posted by space cadet
6000 gallons of fuel ignited upon impact per plane. The other 4000 gallons ignited as the buildings collapsed causing the disinegration of everything in it's way. The hijackers made sure the planes were stocked full of gas, it was a priority of which planes were chosen.
Star and flag John, for bringing up the reality of 9/11.
[edit on 18-9-2009 by space cadet]
...just happened to sit around for an f'ing hour through what the OS and 'official story' call an INTENSE enough fire to melt steel?
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by bsbray11
I would not have to ask the same question 7+ times to receive a legitimate response.
The definition of insane is doing the same thng over and over, and expecting a new outcome.
Originally posted by trueforger
Instead of trolls I'm gonna call these guys joeycanolis,in dishonor.
Originally posted by Stinkhorn1
reply to post by OmegaPoint
Lastly, I though ChimpyGeorge Mc idiotBush was too stupid to even think clearly? If you don't blame him, whom do blame? Cheney?
It still doesn't explain the freefall speed.