Originally posted by Prove_It_NOW
I'm confused. People say "charges" as if some usual detonation device, then they say "nanothermite" or "superthermite". Which one is it?
I believe some sort of explosive means was used to bring down the towers. However, I'm always stuck when people use different terms to explain these
Let's see, if it was "nanothermite" would it be sprayed on? An Aerosol? A Gel?
Nanoscale Chemestry Yeilds Better Explosives
Energetic nanocomposites have a fuel component and an oxidizer component mixed together. One example is a gel made of an oxidizer with a fuel embedded
in the pores of the gel. In one such material (termed a thermite pyrotechnic), iron oxide gel reacts with metallic aluminum particles to release an
enormous amount of heat. "These reactions typically produce temperatures in excess of 3,500 degrees Celsius," says Simpson. Such thermites have
traditionally been produced by mixing fine powders of metal oxides and metal fuels. "Conventionally, mixing these fine powders can result in an
extreme fire hazard. Sol-gel methods can reduce that hazard while dispersing extremely small particles in a uniform way not possible through normal
And as far as the explosion in the video, the other video shows the windows in more of a reaction to the building falling, other than a precursor.
[edit on 18-9-2009 by Prove_It_NOW]
THESE are the questions that should have been answered in the NIST 'HYPOTHESIS'...
BUT, the scientists that were charged to find out HOW and WHY, three buildings had total global collapse...
NOT to find out how 'ONLY FIRE' could have done it
Think about it...since WHEN, do SCIENTISTS, PICK and CHOOSE...ignoring FACTS in lieu of another agenda
WHY would they NOT test for explosives and accelerants, when EVERY other investigator in this country HAS to do it as a MANDATORY step in PROCEDURE in
crimes involving fire according to NFPA 921... "Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations". The national fire code published by The National Fire
Protection Association, is the standard for fire and explosion investigations.
It clearly states that if there is a crime scene that involves fire, tests must be conducted to determine whether residues from any pyrotechnic or
incendiary material can be found.
how does ONE persons 'opinion', negate this step?
7 IS the smoking gun of 9-11.....it slaps you in the face it is SO obvious
as soon as the kink is formed, the HVAC, 'other' Penthouse, roof, facade, within 0.5 seconds from each other, have free fall ACCELERATION for
100+ft. ALL support was INSTANTLY taken away, AS WE SEE by the EVEN decent
If there was a progression from east to west
WE WOULD SEE IT...the roof WILL NOT support itself while columns fail below it. the facade is a non supporting structure, and IS attached to the
perimeter columns it will not stand while the columns fail behind it.
You can not remove support, and have, what is 'being supported', MAGICALLY hanging, waiting for the 'all-clear' to EVENLY fall with
falling ONLY from office combustibles...from fire WE CANT SEE from the windows....EVENLY brought down the ENTIRE structure at a rate you can ONLY
achieve if there is a CLEAR path to do so...that is the ONLY way an object can accelerate
[NCSTAR1A-3.2]"It is likely that much of the burning took place beyond the views of the windows"
"The fires were fed by ordinary office combustibles"
[NCSTAR1A 3.6]"constant, downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was 32f/s^2,(9.8m/s^2), equivalent to the acceleration of
This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories or 32 meters,(105ft.), the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0s.
oh and BTW for ANY of you who like "phases"
free fall ACCELERATION is NOT a "phase" to which you can AVERAGE out free fall, like NIST tries to do
free fall ACCELERATION is an EVENT all itself...it CAN'T be averaged out to SLOW it down
no video or pics show ANY kind of 'total global causing inferno'..ANYWHERE to support the NIST HYPOTHESIS...not even in the NIST report
itself...they could NOT find ANYTHING to back up their HYPOTHESIS....so they DREW illustrations to push their theory