There will be Blood: Pelosi warns of Political 'Violence', page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 08:23 AM by jimmyx
reply to post by kozmo



the majority of voters voted for obama 10 months ago...are you so simple that you do not understand that.
and then you wonder why your in the minority...maybe because you can't tell the truth as in your previous post


reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 12:52 PM by kozmo
Originally posted by jimmyx
reply to
post by kozmo



the majority of voters voted for obama 10 months ago...are you so simple that you do not understand that.
and then you wonder why your in the minority...maybe because you can't tell the truth as in your previous post


I believe you meant "The majority of Americans were duped by Obama". If the majority of Americans still supported him then his approval ratings wouldn't be sinking like a lead boat!!!

In my apparent stupidity and simplicity I became confused with all of the polls showing Obama sinking and the MAJORITY of Americans OPPOSING his agenda and believed that those same Americans were no longer supporting him. See, in my world I call that logic and reason - in your world it is just blind partisanship. Good luck with that!


reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 01:07 PM by silo13
reply to post by endisnighe


He brings up a very good point.

What does she know, that we don’t?

That’s scary stuff.

Thanks for your post and video.

peace


reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 09:22 PM by itguysrule
I get the feeling that the Democrats know they have stirred up a lot of anger and may be feeling a little scared. Just look at the demonstration on 9/12. Whether it was 70 thousand people or 2 million people it was a lot and they weren't happy with the way things are. You have to figure that for everyone that went to Washington that day there were 50 at home who felt the same way and wished they could be there.

I consider myself to be a pretty typical conservative minded person. I hate the President and the Democrats in Washington as much as the next guy. I hope they fail so completely that they are thrown out of office for the next 100 years. Having said that, I still have faith in the system and want them to be removed through fair and honest elections.

Here is the dangerous part - I think we have only one good election left. By that I mean the election in 2010 is critical. I think most Americans still have faith in the system and believe their vote counts. If the 2010 election is held fairly and there is not a lot of scandal and controversy we will be OK. Whether the Democrats win or the Republicans win the most important thing is to have truly fair, open and honest elections.

If the 2010 elections don't go well and there is a lot of blatant cheating, vote rigging, voter registration trickery, intimidation and other dirty tricks - that is when you will see the violence start. If it becomes clear that the system is no longer fair and our votes are not the final say in who is elected then we will be in big trouble.

I am not predicting or promoting anything - that is just the way I see things.


reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 10:06 PM by crimvelvet
reply to post by kinda kurious





America IS a melting pot. Embrace the present and future or be left in the past.


I rather not embrace slavery and that is what Congress is promoting in the guise of "socialism"

The financial sleight of hand used by the Banking Cartel can not withstand the light of day, so the attention of the political activists had to be drawn away from the World Bank/IMF SAPs the "economic manipulation, the cheating, the fraud" and focused on activities that would advance the causes of the banks and corporations. The banking/corporate cartels decided that “socialism” was an excellent vehicle for seducing the “peasants” into cooperating. “What unites the many different forms of Socialism.. is the conception that socialism (or a reasonable facsimile thereof) must be handed down to the grateful masses in one form or another, by a ruling elite which is not subject to their control...” Source


The cartels have found socialism very useful in manipulating political activists as they set up their economic empire. David Rockefeller even admits it.


""This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order..... “The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller

"...Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." - Pg. 405 of David Rockefeller's Autobiography, 2002


reply posted on 19-9-2009 @ 05:50 PM by conspiracyrus
reply to post by kinda kurious



Your really going to defend someone like Nancy Pelosi? i mean B.O. is an alright guy a pawn but a likable pawn ... Nancy Pelosi is just terrible ...

Lets put Pelosi into Perspective shall we?

"The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is a civilian intelligence agency of the United States government.

It is an independent agency responsible for providing national security intelligence to senior United States policymakers." - From Wikipedia

So Nancy Pelosi has said that the CIA was lying when they told her about enhanced interrogation, Well from the above quote it would seem that telling her about "Intelligence" is 1/2 of their job... As providing intelligence to top policy makers is in fact part of their job and Nancy Pelosi being a democrat is in fact supposed to appear to be against torture to her party base wouldnt it stand to logic that Nancy Pelosi is the one lying to save face? rather than the cia lying that they didnt do their job?


"Pelosi, capitalizing on the public’s distaste for the earmarking process, pledged reform during the elections last fall. Members of Congress regularly abuse the appropriations process by earmarking public monies to fund pet projects of special interests and donors often in their own congressional districts or states. Earmarks are an area of the legislative process particularly susceptible to corruption. In May 2007 Pelosi inserted a $25 million earmark into the Water Resources Development Act for a project that involves renovating ports near four separate commercial real estate properties near property owned by her husband, Paul Pelosi, and is likely to significantly boost the value of the property he owns. The properties earn combined rental income of more than $3 million" - Taken from www.conservapedia.com...

So she has a proven track record of trying to "Play the Part". I would go as far as saying shes unethical and dishonest
but what do i know i use the internet to check up on people ... so i guess to mrs Pelosi im a "spy"



[edit on 19-9-2009 by conspiracyrus]


reply posted on 21-9-2009 @ 02:30 AM by Ex_MislTech
reply to post by silo13


Nancy is just tired of waiting for it to begin here on the surface so
she can head underground while the world above shuffles off
this mortal coil.

6.2 billion are on their hit list, and they will be safe underground
while we face the horrors they will set loose.

It is gonna suck.

Good Luck to you all !
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^