I Challenge You Conspirators on This (Bombs on the Planes), page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 23-9-2009 @ 05:47 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by Insolubrious



You guys defy belief!!!

It blows me away, how a stupid YouTube video can be claimed as "PROOF!!!"

I mean....it's such an obviously slanted and manipulated video....it'sick.

Am I the only one who saw the attempt at subliminal messaging?????

Sad, sad.


reply posted on 23-9-2009 @ 06:01 PM by thedman
reply to post by Insolubrious





No - I expect that most of the plane should of exploded up against the facade of the building, raining down huge amounts of plane like debris, including luggage and people. Many plane parts should of fallen down yet nothing did, the whole plane was swallowed up by the building.


The exterior of WTC was NOT SOLID concrete or steel, It was a lattice work of steel beams BOLTED together in 30 ft high sections. Plane
hitting the building sheared the bolts holding exterior wall panels

Plane literally pushed wall in

Here is picture of section of exterior pannels - piece of aircraft embedded




reply posted on 24-9-2009 @ 11:41 AM by Donny 4 million
Originally posted by Karilla
Originally posted by die_another_day
reply to
post by turbofan



WTC 7 was obviously "pulled down"

Twin Towers and Pentagon works in my opinion.


It doesn't even come close to explaining the collapse of WTC 1 & 2, to my mind. The big problem there is how the monumental, and undamaged, sections below the impact points lost all their structural integrity at the moment of collapse, allowing the building to free-fall, not to mention removing the moment of inertia of the top of the south tower that began to topple and rotate.... and then stopped rotating to fall straight down.

Bombs on the planes does not get rid of the core columns.

[edit on 23-9-2009 by Karilla]


The twins were quite larger than BUILDING SEVEN the one felled by CD alone.
To address the twins ---take into consideration the CD obvious in all video.
Compound that with the total possibility of a craft loaded to the tail section
with the latest in steel melting chemicals. They would attack the lower super
structure with a vengeance and keep melting for weeks.
Hence helping to collapse the buildings in thier footprint.


reply posted on 24-9-2009 @ 12:30 PM by thedman
reply to post by Donny 4 million





Compound that with the total possibility of a craft loaded to the tail section
with the latest in steel melting chemicals.


Steel Melting chemicals?

Never heard of anything so stupid

Of course when a truther is confronted with reality usual response is
to invent something completely insane.....


reply posted on 24-9-2009 @ 09:00 PM by Donny 4 million
Originally posted by thedman
reply to
post by Donny 4 million





Compound that with the total possibility of a craft loaded to the tail section
with the latest in steel melting chemicals.



Steel Melting chemicals?


Never heard of anything so stupid

Of course when a truther is confronted with reality usual response is
to invent something completely insane.....


You know what is resoundingly stupid thed.---The phony, disgusting, stupid story you subscribe to. The one that says the chemicals needed to melt the steel that day were right in the friggin building already. Duh!
So whatever was in those planes was just complimentary.
COME on BACK hear! I need a good spin!!!! And another laugh.


reply posted on 24-9-2009 @ 09:45 PM by Donny 4 million
reply to post by SPreston



With more than one tear on my cheek and an ever growing hole in my hart.
I asked myself to think positive. Like John Walsh and his son's tragedy.
America's Most Wanted.
Does that hole match in dimension the size of the aircraft
purported in the Commissions fabrications?
Anyone?


reply posted on 24-9-2009 @ 10:48 PM by thedman
reply to post by SPreston



Maybe should refer to your own pictures

Exterior panels were composed of vertical beams connected together
by horizontal spandrel plates - which were bolted to the vertical members



The spandrel panels interconnecting them comprise steel plates, 1.32 m deep. 12 m above the entrance level the columns are combined in groups of three to form single base columns, spaced at 3.05 m centres and with an overall cross-section of 800 x 800 mm.


The panels were connected to each other by bolts in 30 ft high panels


The external framework was erected using prefabricated three-storey units, each comprising columns interconnected by spandrel panels. These units, ranging in weight from 22.3 to 6.0 tonnes, were fitted together, alternately staggered in one storey heights, and spliced with high-strength friction-grip bolts.


The aircraft impacts caused many of the panels to fail at the connections
- either at the spandrel plates connecting the vertical beams or at the connections with the other panels



reply posted on 24-9-2009 @ 11:29 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by Donny 4 million



This is a repeat.

I am sorry to be the one to point this out.

This thread's premise (Bombs on the Planes) is so far off, and out in Never-Never-Land it barely merits full attention.

Just another in the continuing series of increasingly incredible "conspiracy theories"....and the sad thing is, the people who are "behind" this
ever-increasingly repeated 'thread'.....just repeat the same pseudo-science. In the guise of "aviation"....

Only a few of us can recognize BS when we see it....and that is part of the problem.....


reply posted on 25-9-2009 @ 07:38 AM by Donny 4 million
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to
post by Donny 4 million



This is a repeat.

I am sorry to be the one to point this out.

This thread's premise (Bombs on the Planes) is so far off, and out in Never-Never-Land it barely merits full attention.

Just another in the continuing series of increasingly incredible "conspiracy theories"....and the sad thing is, the people who are "behind" this
ever-increasingly repeated 'thread'.....just repeat the same pseudo-science. In the guise of "aviation"....

Only a few of us can recognize BS when we see it....and that is part of the problem.....





Well then, get your butt out of the simulator and pay FULL attention to the 911 TRAGEDIES.
You know why weedy?
There are ALOT of us here that can see straight through your BS.
No problem here.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 11 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 7 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 15 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags