It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Declassified 9/11 Photos

page: 1
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 16 2009 @ 04:23 PM
link   
Sorry if this has already been posted.

No words....

soapy.posterous.com...




posted on Sep, 16 2009 @ 04:25 PM
link   
Do you know why these photos were classified in the first place? That's if they really were classified pictures.

Seem to be ordinary pictures one could find on the web.


BTW, thanks for the site.

[edit on 16-9-2009 by jam321]



posted on Sep, 16 2009 @ 04:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
Sorry if this has already been posted.

No words....

soapy.posterous.com...


Nope these all look new to me, S and F for you, great find (I didn`t mean that in a bad way)



posted on Sep, 16 2009 @ 04:52 PM
link   
Ok, I'm kind of confused. How were helicopters up taking pictures? I thought all aircraft were grounded that day.



posted on Sep, 16 2009 @ 05:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by killuminati2012
Ok, I'm kind of confused. How were helicopters up taking pictures? I thought all aircraft were grounded that day.


This is probably why they were classified.

Some arial photos were taken after the building/s fell, which means nothing should have been in the airspace at that time.

However, for the 30+ minutes from when it turned off it's transponder and turned around, American airspace may as well have been undefended.

We have F16s that can be in the air in 2:30 minutes, around the clock.

They didn't show up until later though.

This means by the time these pictures were taken, only government aircraft should have been in the air.

These photos were most likely taken by the government, and were just released by them.



posted on Sep, 16 2009 @ 07:20 PM
link   
God bless America.




posted on Sep, 17 2009 @ 06:14 AM
link   
Nothing new, I have had these pictures at the least. for a year and a half. Never saw anything about them being classified either.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:08 PM
link   
I hadn't see these anywhere so star and flag for you OP. The government classifies some stupid stuff. Most of the crap they do is just beyond my understanding...*shakes my head*.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Seventh
 


I, can only imagine, your drool, ATM,LOL.

Man, put your mack down, on these.

Cant wait, to see what you see,from your perspective.

Lots to see .



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:24 PM
link   
reply to post by sad_eyed_lady
 

Hugs, and kisses, thanks for posting, these wonderfully clear, pics.

Lots of burnt buildings, and blown out, windows, of other buildings, around,the towers .

Just so much chaos!



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:24 PM
link   
Has anyone else noticed the discrepancies in the photo! There are big time ones!!

EDIT = I was wrong - they are corner shots of the building - no discrepancy.



[edit on 25-9-2009 by questioningall]



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:28 PM
link   
reply to post by questioningall
 


No i havn't, noticed anything yet, but i just skimmed through them.

I will look harder, in just a few to see what i see.

Any help, in any particular number, of photo?



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:30 PM
link   
reply to post by lycopersicum
 


EDIT - POST WIPED OUT - my bad - no problems with the photos.

[edit on 25-9-2009 by questioningall]



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:30 PM
link   
What building, is in,pic 3?
Anyone know?



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:33 PM
link   
reply to post by lycopersicum
 


Nope - Okay - here is another hint - look at picture number 11 - don't count the frame with the words at the beginning. Look at that picture closely - What do you see?



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:38 PM
link   
reply to post by lycopersicum
 


Edited - no photo problems

[edit on 25-9-2009 by questioningall]



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:39 PM
link   
They keep nondescript type evidence in terms of it's incriminatory nature classified, so that when released , it appears that any information they hold is of a similarly unremarkable nature.


[edit on 25-9-2009 by Drexl]



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:43 PM
link   
reply to post by sad_eyed_lady
 


You are right no words...

But this is a forum of words so I must try. Yep these were all knew ones on me. Some seemed very similar to others I've seen but from a different angles. S&F to you.

One thing I do take away from these shots is that

A) Single solitary planes could not bring down such buildings.
B) Any high rise building weak enough to collapse after a plane hits it will not fall in near freefall on to its own footprint.
C) Imagine how it would have been if they fell 'naturally'. The death toll would be so high that even some of TPTB would be affected with grief.



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:45 PM
link   
reply to post by questioningall
 


Time to fess up.

I am going cross eyed staring at that pic.



Larger pics on this flickr page

www.flickr.com...

[edit on 25-9-2009 by jam321]



posted on Sep, 25 2009 @ 10:47 PM
link   
reply to post by jam321
 


LOL

Okay, no one else got what was so obvious to me?

The photos from a distance - that show TWO buildings on fire - LOOK at ooppppsp

number 12 not 11!!



new topics




 
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join