It was Paint for sure!, page 2

Originally posted by bsbray11

Originally posted by hooper
I don't think you realize the enormity of the task you are describing. We are not talking about sneaking a pipe bomb into the bathroom.

Neither am I. What I was talking about was a 5-gallon drum type bomb that was attached to a gas pipeline, according to affidavits, which is inside the actual infrastructure of the building. In a federal building, no less. Now that REALLY doesn't make sense. And the same building was subsequently involved in a "domestic terror" event.

So this kind of stuff is not only possible, it's already happened before.

Imagine repainting the steel in a skyscraper. It would be in the news,

You've got to be kidding me.

Here's another ATS thread that would educate you: Crew welds 200 plates to Building for 3 months "almost unknown"

The building in question in the above link was also a skyscraper in NY, and the reason the plates were welded to it during the night was because a flaw was found in the design after construction that could have allowed a catastrophic failure of that building under high wind loads. It was eventually a news story simply because of how few people were aware that it was going on every night, in the dead of night, though everything about that operation was actually legal.

there would be inspectors all over the place

No sir. For one thing, inspectors are NOT all up a maintenance man's ass in a building while he is doing any given work. Inspectors come along when inspections have to be done. For another thing, this building was neither in NY or NJ and had its own separate legal authority to answer to. It was not even subject to many of the same legal codes, and the Port Authority did or oversaw almost everything themselves.

Permits, submittals and huge paper trail. Not to mention leasees losing a large quantity of their rental space, etc., etc. etc.

Tenants having to put up with building maintenance was typical in those buildings. There was maintenance going on in them all the time, as even some 9/11 witnesses testified to, for example construction worker Philip Morelli. I already told you, all the maintenance logs (the "huge paper trail") was destroyed during the collapses, not that anyone would actually be stupid enough to write "installing bombs/explosives" on a permit.

As for the Murrah building - I think I heard rumors about that but that it was ultimately just that rumors or misunderstandings.

Nope, sorry again.

I posted 4 relevant documents to what I am describing on this thread: www.abovetopsecret.com...

I can find more of that kind of documentation. If it isn't enough for you, maybe we can even find the relevant people to call to verify that these are indeed their memos. But that's only if it really comes down to you being that hard-headed.

Your response is full of a lot of holes. I have worked with Port Authority inspectors - trust me, if you are touching the steel frame of the building in any way shape or form, they will be there. Installing a new outlet in an office? They'll look at it next week - but you go messing with the structural elements of one of the tallest buildings in the world, where the Port Authority had an office, and there will be people looking, a lot, all the time.

And for the record, you are not talking about maintenance workers. The outer structure around the steel would needed to be removed, walls, ceilings, etc. then strip off the fireproofing, then strip off the paint to white metal (grinding, sandblasting, scraping) which will require compressors and collection systems. Then apply the super nano thermite, and the initiation system, and the controls.

As for the refernece to the Citicorp building - welding those plates on would be like childs play compared to the thermite application operation. And by the way the article said almost unknown to the public, therefore not unknown and definetly not unknown to the residents of the building (if there were any).