I'm not a Republican, so I don't entirely agree with some of those points, but there are some that even as a non-Republican I agree with.
1) Taxpayers' Bill of Rights (TABOR). Limit federal spending growth to the percentage in population growth plus the rate of inflation; provide
taxpayers the option of filing a post-card sized return using a low, flat tax rate of 25%.
I don't know anyone other than Millionaires+Billionaires who would cry foul about this one. A Flat Tax gets rid of Tax Shelters and Loopholes that
the Rich use to avoid Income Tax, but if the Rich get taxed just like the Low and Middle Classes, then it's definitely going to help the Economy.
Besides, what under-educated person at the Poverty Level is going to complain about not having to pay someone to do their 1040EZ every year?
4) King Dollar. Preserve a strong dollar so that Americans' savings aren't wiped out by inflation and the U.S. dollar remains the world's reserve
currency
Again, what Democrat, Republican, Independent or Libertarian in their right mind wouldn't agree with this. Of course, each of those may disagree how
to achieve and maintain a Surplus Budget, but I can't imagine anyone being against this in principle.
5) Empower American Business. Immediately slash corporate tax rates to 15% and scrap the corporate capital-gains tax altogether
If this were given a 10-year Time Limit to better help promote the American Economy you would be able to easier sell this to all parties. It's
certainly a better alternative to Bail-Outs.
7) Statism Exit Plan. De-fund czars; immediately cease bailout payments to failed companies; ban future bailouts
It's not like Czars are any more expensive than any other Staff. The Executive Cabinet has been need of being redesigned and modernized any way.
However, that is something that falls under the purview of the Senate to decide.
As far as ceasing Bail-Out payments to companies that have not used that money wisely and are still failing or looking for yet another hand out, I
think cutting the Life-Support is a good idea (but aren't Republicans against Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide?).
Certainly we shouldn't entertain the idea of any more Bail-Outs. Other than the Fed and Treasury Departments, you're not going to find anyone
disagreeing with that, no matter what their party affiliation may be.
8) End Generational Theft. As few believe America's entitlement programs will be able to pay benefits to future generations, provide younger workers
the choice of diverting payroll/Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts
Nationalized 401K Plans is what SS should have been in the first place. Allowing individuals to choose a Government managed 401K Market Fund or
rolling their balance over to another 401K Market Fund of their choosing shouldn't offend anyone. If you can roll your 401K from one Employer to
another Employer's 401K, then why shouldn't you be able to roll it over from Government to Private Fund?
9) Restore America's System of Justice. Introduce British-style penalties for frivolous lawsuits, where those who launch unsuccessful lawsuits are
liable for the defendants' legal bills
Again, I don't know anyone who would disagree with this. Personally, I would say take it a step further and require those who launch unsuccessful
lawsuits to be liable even when settled out of Court. Do you know how much it costs to defend against a frivolous IP lawsuit that never even makes it
to Trial? A minimum of $5 million! Most people can't afford to defend themselves and are willing to be victims of Highway Robbery at the Out-of-Court
Bargaining Table.
10) American Energy Independence. All-of-the-Above strategy that embraces alternatives, expands and accelerates exploration and production of oil and
natural gas, and jumpstarts dramatic increases in nuclear power
The only opposition this would meet is how it is to be implemented. All sides agree that America needs to gain Energy Independence. However, not all
agree that Oil, Natural Gas and Nuclear Power are viable options to do such. Switching our dependence on Foreign Non-Renewable Resources to Domestic
Non-Renewable Resources makes little sense. The Left and the Middle will oppose this wanting to gain Energy Independence through Renewable Resources
such as Solar, Wind and Hydro Power. If the Right is willing to meet everyone else half-way on this, then no one is going to oppose it.
Items 2, 3 and 6 will not feasibly happen as they are exclusively Partisan Issues. Only those on the far Right would agree to those and the rest will
remain diametrically opposed to such changes.
However, for the rest outlined above, there isn't much there that Democrats, Independents, Libertarians and others couldn't get behind, in at least
principle.