It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stardust1955
I have listened to a lot of reverse speech. Every single one, either I don't hear what they hear, or, I hear something totally different. And, if you weren't told what was supposedly heard, is that what was really said reversed? Some of it is pretty good, but I feel that everyone hears something different if you can even understand what is said in reverse.
I personally have done my speech in reverse and it sounds very foreign languaged to me. Can't understand a single word in reverse.
Anyway, back to the subject at hand. No, I do not feel David is a fraud, he is way too positive. Why would someone so positive be a fraud.
Originally posted by Harman
Not sure but if i recieve enough hours of audio from the OP i think i could find some reverse speech clip that says he eats babies. It's fun to play around with but i can't see how it could be taken seriously really. It's the power of suggestion.
presumed EVP experiences,
By their fruits ye shall know them.
If Wilcock’s a fraud, then I support him.
And apparently so do many other credible and high level U.S. government scientists, astronauts, military and government personnel indirectly through their own testimony.
Unfortunately reverse speech is a hoax. Please do some real research on your own concepts.
Power of suggestion. But if you want to take it seriously, have fun. I won't stop you.
But that does not give any more credibility to the reverse speach thing. If you really think you can give proof of his intentional or unintentional misguiding of his listeners please give it but reverse speach is nothing more than some red herring and a fun way to waste your time.
Originally posted by Harman
reply to post by insideNSA
Oh deary me, i did a booboo typing reverse speech wrong that surely negates everything i say. No, not really, sorry about that. You attacking me on that ajust proves my point. I will do my best to remember to write speech right if you try to grow up.
Like i said you may be right that wilcock is wrong about a lot of stuff but reverse speech doesn't do anything other than connect a meaning on something meaningless like a reversed sentence. I looked into it a couple of times in the previous years and i was even convinced for a short while.
Until i saw the other things like the fake subbed bollywood movies where the (for us) unintelligable sentences were made into crazy persons english with the help of the fake subs and the workings of the mind and it's obsession to correlate sounds even if the correlation is totally bunk.
You have a linguistic matrix in your head and every human and even some animal sounds will be translated with the help of that matrix, the same goes for reverse speech.
Anyway, happy to keep you mildly amused and i will go to greener pastures now.
[edit on 18-9-2009 by Harman]
Originally posted by insideNSA
This is to address you and the other poster that have their doubts about reverse speech. PLEASE PLEASE do your research before you make statements about something you know nothing about. If you do a little research you will be shockingly surprised.