Please forgive me if this has already been posted. But I think its important that we see all the data out there on the leaders of the 2012 movement,
even the not so nice stuff and then make a judgement for ourselves. Please read and understand my take on DW before you go to the page claiming he is
Now I actually like David Wilcock's web site, divinecosmos. I think he presents a wealth of VERY INTERESTING information that TPTB rather not be
common knowledge. A lot of the information he presents, if true, (and to me that's still a big if, especially when he talks about experiments of
making a frog embryo grow into a salamander simply by shining laser light through a salamander at the developing frog embryo.) is simply amazing. I
wish he would give more references when talking about such amazing experiments. I know SOME of the stuff he talks about is true do to my own research
and experiences. So I said his data is awesome and points to the fact that us humans, have much more power than we realize, as far as what the
natural human consciousness is capable of. And the fact that this power is magnified when more people concentrate on the same goal. And there surely
MANY MANY more 'have nots' than 'haves'. If we were not so divided, we could concentrate on getting the TPTB to become TPTW (the powers that
So this stuff which he presents is awesome. Than it starts getting a little hairy in two areas for me, which makes me think twice about DW.
Firstly when he talks about his 'Montauk' contact he happened to randomly meet in some diner. This makes me think he's totally gullible because
all the stuff this guy told him, I had read on the internet in the late 90's on saturday nights in college at 3 am in the morning when there was
nothing better to do than surf internet drunk after coming home from the parties. Don't know how David could take what this guy presented as fact
and then use it in his presentations. To me it sounds like the guy was just having a little fun with David, sensing his gullability. Perhaps David
was gullible in the fact that what the guy was spueing out to him was exactl what he wanted to hear due to David having such a great interest in the
subject... as if David wanted what he said to be true. So he took it as fact based on emotion. I just thought he would have seen this for what it
is. How could he possibly prove to David that anything he said was true and that this guy wasn't reading the same conspiratorial dis-info quasi
sci-fi stuff I was.
Secondly and most importantly... Though David's research and information is awesome. His correlation to how this all adds up to some great ascension
in 2012 is weak at best. And that is being generous. He takes great leaps of faith in going from healing a tumored rasberry with laser light shined
on it through the hologram of a healthy rasberry to we are all going to ascend in 2012 and things will be '100 times more harmonious' on earth.
When you take leaps of faith like this, what you are lecturing about becomes more of a religion than solid science
So this is my opinion of David Wilcock. As I said I enjoy reading his site and I enjoy his view on the world. Its very interesting and I share a lot
of the same ideas he does. But I just can't make those leaps of faith he does. And if he is doing this for egotistical reasons or financial gain
then this will come back and bite him in the rear. Afterall, if he is right, we will all be happy 4th density humans. If he is wrong than I'm sure
booksales will go down and he will quickly become irrelevant. (reminiscent of nancy leider and Zeta-talk)
That being said, i sincerely hope DAVID IS RIGHT IN ALL HE SAYS
With this in mind consider the following link below. I surely hope that this is just dis-info against David and it is not true. I'd like someone
who is adept at reverse speech to confirm or deny this.
Link below in next post (ran outta room in this 1)
[edit on 16-9-2009 by insideNSA]