It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DragonriderGal
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
Originally posted by DragonriderGal
[I have a great website for you, in return. WWW.jesusneverexisted.com.
This is an excellent website that debunks everything about Christianity. Thanks for posting it.
You're welcome. Yes, I think it is one of the best sites I have found for that, to date.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by DragonriderGal
wow that site is a mess. it deliberately makes assumptions about subjects based on what one group out of hundreds believes. it assumes because nazara means truth that never actually was the name of a town. ya know, these types of papers are like the ones written not so long ago claiming gilgamesh never existed and yet they've found his city in the last 2 years. and since gilgamesh isn't in the bible, he's afforded some place in history. i think this insistence in eradicating jesus is a bit obsessive and strange.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Visiting ESB
you assume too much. i also have faith in the ancient texts of the other ancient cultures. in other words, i don't buy the mainstream theme that all ancient texts and figures are mythological. and that includes jesus. i can make a case that you don't exist too if i'm highly selective. i may be a christian but at least i don't assume i know exactly what happened to other people thousands of years ago.
Originally posted by undo
there were sons of enki before in the ancient literature.
heck for that matter, there were sons of enlil before in the ancient literature.
there were sons of gods in greece, rome, iran, iraq, egypt, china, and so on. why is it that jesus being called son of god negates only HIS existence? how is it that sun ends up being son? some of the arguments are so flimsy it almost looks like they're trying to achieve the opposite effect.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Skeptical Ed
who is the orchestra leader? clearly most catholics worship mary. so who is keeping the world gripped in fear of jesus?
Originally posted by undo
it really became obvious when i was mulling over what would happen if science were to provide immortality to a few choice atheists.
Originally posted by undo
it was then i realized that the difference is love. and i don't mean sexual congress, i mean just pure simple love. without it, eternity would be boring.
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Skeptical Ed
who is the orchestra leader? clearly most catholics worship mary. so who is keeping the world gripped in fear of jesus?
Do you really have to ask? Just look around and in the bible. Fail to worship Jesus, go to hell and suffer an eternity. What could be more simple than the Gospel of Christ?
Originally posted by undo
it really became obvious when i was mulling over what would happen if science were to provide immortality to a few choice atheists.
I'm an atheist, but I also believe our spirit and soul are eternal. We just don't need Jesus or a god. WE created this, together, to experience physicality and more than we could learn and grow as spirits.
Originally posted by undo
it was then i realized that the difference is love. and i don't mean sexual congress, i mean just pure simple love. without it, eternity would be boring.
Well, at least we've found some common ground upon which we can agree.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
A true atheist would never accept the concept of spirit/soul, those are religious terms. WE did not create this, strong-minded individuals created it to control weak-minded individuals and they did one hell of a good job!
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
A true atheist would never accept the concept of spirit/soul, those are religious terms. WE did not create this, strong-minded individuals created it to control weak-minded individuals and they did one hell of a good job!
Semantics is the last things I'm interested in. So by your definition of atheist I don't qualify as a "true" atheist. So ...big deal...whatever...the point of this thread is to seek stories of those who have experienced alien abductions and whether they have used the name Jesus in an attempt to stop the abduction. If you don't believe the abductee's stories, so be it. I and others (including Christians) are able to be a bit more discerning and know that most of the people relating these stories aren't lying. A blanket rejection of the accounts of these individuals is the least scientific approach anyone could make. And you pride yourself on facts and science? Seems to me a "truly" scientific approach would seek answers to mysterious events, not reject the fact of those events on a wholesale basis. To claim "they're all lying or misinterpreting natural phenomenon" is simply dishonest.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
A true atheist would never accept the concept of spirit/soul, those are religious terms. WE did not create this, strong-minded individuals created it to control weak-minded individuals and they did one hell of a good job!
Semantics is the last things I'm interested in. So by your definition of atheist I don't qualify as a "true" atheist. So ...big deal...whatever...the point of this thread is to seek stories of those who have experienced alien abductions and whether they have used the name Jesus in an attempt to stop the abduction. If you don't believe the abductee's stories, so be it. I and others (including Christians) are able to be a bit more discerning and know that most of the people relating these stories aren't lying. A blanket rejection of the accounts of these individuals is the least scientific approach anyone could make. And you pride yourself on facts and science? Seems to me a "truly" scientific approach would seek answers to mysterious events, not reject the fact of those events on a wholesale basis. To claim "they're all lying or misinterpreting natural phenomenon" is simply dishonest.
But I've done exactly as you requested: I am seeking answers and the only way to get them is to have the claimant present evidence. Please don't put quote marks on a comment you created to make it look like it was said by someone else, in this case, me. Why is it so difficult for you to understand that evidence solves the problem? There is no way that saying Jesus is going to have any effect on humans, plants, or aliens. Jesus is a mythical figure. You can say, Amun-Ra, you can say Saggitarius, or you can just blow a Bronx cheer. They will all have the same effect: zero!
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
reply to post by MAJIC 12
You said: "yet from the first week,people were killed for proclaiming Jesus'rose from the dead." There is no historical evidence to support your comment. Everything that is known about the mythical Jesus was written many years or, way after, his alleged existence. Stand on a firm foundation of fact.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by moocowman
you're doing it again, moocowman.
christians do not "do this", as if everyone with the name joe was somehow afflicted with a facial tick. it isn't a genetic abnormality. it isn't a proclivity. it isn't even a teaching. it's just the extent of our knowledge on the subject. now if you were to say SOME christians, then you'd be more accurate. but please for the sake of my eyeballs and attached brain, refrain from the blanket statement?
And this in a nutshell is the stumbling block of anyone professing to be an xtian, there just is no evidence of the reality of the jesus with the xtian attributes.