Carter: Race Plays Role in Obama Dislike - UPDATED: White House rejects racism claim, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 15-9-2009 @ 09:19 PM by TheOneElectric
Let me settle this.

In the right wing conservative ideology there is a long running system of subliminal bigotry. Whether it be from changing historical fact to preforming the most fantastic mental gymnastics to make themselves feel superior to all others. It exists. The WASPs raise their children to think that they are better than everyone else who is no WASP and rich. However, this has seeped into the lower classes of white south and middle America. The lower class obviously desires to emulate the values of the higher class, if for nothing more than to separate themselves from the people of the darker skin complexions. However, it is not a true desire to hate. It is subliminal and it hits the subconscious. The propaganda is in the media and every form of advertisement. The original hatred stems from the hatred of our ancestors. With this TPTB can effectively create a controlled "us versus them" paradigm. Now, once you have an elected official that is not only a democrat but a person that is more than an octoroon...heh heh, you are bound to have hatred. If that isn't enough, you have the giant illusion of 9/11. The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it. Have a semitic name (yes, semitic stands for more than just the jews) you have trouble, BIG trouble.

The subliminal racism that has bombarded their minds and souls explodes. Irrational dislike begins and they search for a reason to hate. It is the best tool in "TPTB" 's bag. They divide and they conquer. Who would rule a hyper power? A man with dark skin as such? I do not think so...he is strange, he is not like me, he is...below me. I am better than him, he is changing my country, I hate this. I HATE IT. HE IS A LIAR! HE WANTS TO KILL OUR BABIES! HE IS THE ANTICHRIST! MUSLIM! KENYAN!

God bless the souls of man...for he is misguided and full of hate.

Bush was given three years before he was attacked. After one or two angry marches about the election...all the nonsense was dropped and he was accepted as the leader of the free world. Obama...disenfranchised voters hated him from the start. The hate grew. Religion was once again perverted in order to be used as a weapon of hate. Lies were utilized to cover the eyes of people. The psychic fuel that runs the hate machine was being provided at an alarming pace. Now, we have all of this people banding together in hate. Not love, but hate. Violence is bound to occur, and if it does TPTB will succeed. Illuminati set 1 will win, and they will do away with us. Illuminati set 2 will be unable to succeed in their goals to advance the human race to its true potential.

To be truthful, it is not just the whites who are provided with this psychic fuel. It's everyone, and it hits them in different ways. Whether it is to oppress, to separate, or to hate. It serves it purpose of blinding us to love.

So in short, yes, this has a lot to do with racism. But, in my beliefs I give them the benefit of the doubt and I do not blame them for it.

Love yourself....love others as you love yourself. Please, empathy, love, and kindness. Ghandi's revolution is the only type that truly succeeds.

Wake up.


reply posted on 15-9-2009 @ 09:20 PM by AshleyD
reply to post by Gools



Just for the record, I'm not saying it's OK to oppose a candidate just for their affiliation. If we had a democrat come in that abolished the FED, lowered the deficit, cut government spending, brought out troops home, I'd be all up in it even though I am a republican.

I'm just saying for those that do oppose Obama 'just cuz' it is most likely due to political affiliations- not race. Just the way it has been for ages in our country.

There are some who oppose Obama due to his policies, actions, proposals, spending, etc., then there are those who oppose him for his race, then there are those who oppose him because he's a democrat, which I feel is the majority.



reply posted on 15-9-2009 @ 09:30 PM by loam
reply to post by DontTreadOnMe



Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
Imho, if he were doing a great job, this renewal of playing the race card would not be surfacing.


Except, this card never really left the table. It was played from nearly the beginning to divert attention from other issues.

In fact, I can't remember a single week where it wasn't played.


reply posted on 15-9-2009 @ 09:38 PM by schrodingers dog
Originally posted by Gools

I would suggest that it's ability to actually accomplish these ends is due to the fact that there is some validity attached to the accusation.


Lol no argument there, though obviously that doesn't apply to everyone ...

My observation is that historically the string pullers will use the most convenient divisive structure. Be it racism, patriotism, socialism, [insert] ism.

As I tried to express in this
post within a different context, I believe that much of this is part of the "pains" of a relatively new nation. Perhaps that is a hopeful rationalization, but it is the reason that though I get immensely frustrated with being stuck in this discourse, I believe that in the long run it is actually for the best.

Heck sometimes I wish we'd even stop beating around the bush and just lay it all on the table once and for all. No more covert prejudice ... put it all out there hate and all and lets discuss it and work through it. Alas that doesn't seem to be forthcoming, so we are stuck at taking these painfully dragged out baby steps ...

But at least we're walking forward.



reply posted on 15-9-2009 @ 09:40 PM by xmotex
reply to post by northof8



Err, when have inner cities not been hotbeds of poverty and crime, whether the occupants were white or black?

This has been true since the Industrial Revolution, people made the same arguments 100 years ago about the Italians and the Irish

Claiming that is solely due to their race is racist, pretty much by definition

[edit on 9/15/09 by xmotex]


reply posted on 15-9-2009 @ 09:40 PM by AshleyD
reply to post by Gools



Otherwise everybody would just dismiss it and move along. Right?


Well, for the most part, the 'accused' do. It's typically the accusers that can't seem to let that angle go, in my observation.

Bush received some massive opposition throughout his terms and had a severely low approval rating at the end. Was it because he was white? I remember the right having a party with the Clinton scandal. Did they go after him because he was white? No. It boiled down to the right/left division. So I think that is what Obama is going through now. I believe it's partisan more than racial.


reply posted on 15-9-2009 @ 09:41 PM by melatonin
reply to post by Gools



Of course it is. Much of it is transparent or only thinly veiled. Started back with the attempt to label him a terrorist.

But it's only a part. Clinton was a white southern pretty much conservative dem, and was vilified to a decent level by the same groups as well.



[edit on 15-9-2009 by melatonin]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

This Hoax Effects Everyone!!!
  Political Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 55 flags
My opinion about this site's purpose
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 45 flags
Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
  World War Three, Posted 13 hours ago, 29 flags
I'm sick of all the KOOKS!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 22 flags
New Topic Fire-hose censoring
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 12 flags