It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Pathos
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
So I take it you can't prove to me that Alpha Centauri exists then....
I'll be waiting...
-WFA
Again. I am not trying to prove anything. You are.
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
While I wont defend somebody that is ignorant enough to go on tv and say there is no chance aliens could traverse the vastness of space, I will defend skeptics.
You can get as mad at them as you want, but it is not the skeptics that have made this subject so laughable that it can't be taken seriously by the people that need to in order for the truth to come out.
I wouldn't cry and whine about the very small minority called skeptics. If I were you I would focus more on the vocal majority and police them better.
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
The AA fire confirms that it wasn't man-made...
You see, when examining a case, the ENTIRE data set matters...
In fact, further corroboration of the theory that it was not man made can be found from the radar returns themselves. (They tracked it and calculated it's speed, higher than anything that humans made in 1942).
-WFA
Originally posted by Pathos
Hmmm.... Its not man-made from whose perspective?
Originally posted by Pathos
You didn't consider perception into your examination.
Originally posted by Pathos
Even though a military air-force officer knows about F-16s, he may not know about other 'black ops' planes. One arm of the military doesn't know what the other one is doing. That is why your argument eats itself.
Originally posted by Pathos
You can use this as an analogy for any other argument. Police do not know what the military is working on, so how can they definitively know that something was not man made. It goes on and on and on... What one radar operator sees is different from another who has different experiences.
Originally posted by frugal
P.S. ) To the statement I just typed, Oxford Scientist turned aluminum nearly INVISIBLE to extreme ultraviolet radiation. Wed. July 29th,2009 this information was released publically. They named it a new state of matter. This is hard science. This explains alot. This is where the future aircraft stealth may go. This is incredible!!!!!!!
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
You do realize that it's been 60+ years since the event, right?
-WFA
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
In science, Evidence is key, Proof does not exist.
-WFA
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
It bugs me to see skeptics utilize Occam's Razor to 'dis-prove' a case, and then refuse to apply it to a case where the simplest solution is an extraterretrial craft. Cases like the BOLA case...
Hope that helps clarify my response.
-WFA
Edited to fix spelling - Occam's razor is a tool, not a took
[edit on 16-9-2009 by WitnessFromAfar]
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
I personally think that many skeptics take the other side of the debate because they think ufology opens the door to religion.
I think many of them truly hate religion and as soon as they say extraterrestrials exists then that opens the door to religion because extraterrestrials can be the gods of religion and also they can't limit their technology so questions about life after death would come into the mix as well.
I do think the root of much of the opposition to these things is religion. Ufology opens the floodgates when it comes to religion and spirituality.
Originally posted by Tifozi
...Why are you afraid of believing? Because someone may call you crazy, unless you have an alien object in your hands?...
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Take the Los Angeles WWII anti-aircraft event for example. Sure -- it was very odd, but why exactly is the only explanation "alien craft"? It just seems odd to me to jump to that conclusion. There was nothing specific about the "Battle of Los Angeles" that would point to "alien craft". Unidentified craft? -- yes. An "odd" event? -- yes. Alien craft? -- no specific evidence.
Originally posted by Pathos
There is only one way to prove that Earth is being visited by aliens.
Hold a press conference. Bring an alive alien and his space craft for the public to test and examine. If it turns out to be authentic through scientific examination, (done by credible individuals), I am willing to concede that they do exist. Until that one special day comes to light, the existence of UFOs is based upon subjective interpretation of evidence.