It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kleverone
When someone assumes that the only form of propulsion could be through fossil fuels, then yes I consider that inside the box. Call it lack of imagination or creative thought if you will...
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
... but I also have no reason to believe that there are alien craft visiting the Earth -- no matter what propulsion method they used.
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
Mostly because the existence of neutrinos has been documented and tested. Just like the existence of UFOs. Evidence exists for both. Period.
Ignoring that evidence does not make it go away. It merely looses one credibility within the ongoing scientific debate...
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
reply to post by Pathos
Like I've said many times before, outside of Math, proof for ANYTHING does not exist.
Originally posted by Pathos
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
reply to post by Pathos
Like I've said many times before, outside of Math, proof for ANYTHING does not exist.
You logic is that nothing exist in general, so you do not need evidence to prove that something exists. That is illogical to this subject.
Originally posted by Pathos
I went though your evidence earlier. Its all based upon subjective interpretation of presented evidence. There is no science in your arguments.
You have no proof.
[edit on 16-9-2009 by Pathos]
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
So I take it you can't prove to me that Alpha Centauri exists then....
I'll be waiting...
-WFA
Originally posted by Pathos
Thinking outside of the box does not prove the existence of anything. You can think outside of normal testing to start a theory; however, the definitive answer must be in the form of actual evidence.
Originally posted by Pathos
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
So I take it you can't prove to me that Alpha Centauri exists then....
I'll be waiting...
-WFA
Again. I am not trying to prove anything. You are.
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
How about examining some of it? Radar returns (verified by HQ and tracked on 3 separate coastal radar units) qualifies as scientific evidence of a real and solid object.
But I guess if you'd actually read the thread you'd know that...
You see that's exactly what I've done, formulate a theory, and TEST it against the evidence in the case.
-WFA
Originally posted by Pathos
Since we also live in the digital age, most of those pics could have been altered.
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
LOL The event happened in 1942!!! Yeah, you must be right Pathos, it was photoshopped! LOLOLOL
-WFA
Originally posted by Pathos
Your are now making the argument that radar can prove the existence of alien made UFOs.
Originally posted by Pathos
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
LOL The event happened in 1942!!! Yeah, you must be right Pathos, it was photoshopped! LOLOLOL
-WFA
I am a graphic designer. I can make anything look like 1800 BC through Photoshop.