It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's considered to be one of the more recent innovations to help the hapless traveller.
But the satnav system may not be as modern as we think.
According to a new theory, prehistoric man navigated his way across England using a similar system based on stone circles and other markers.
Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk...
The complex network of stones, hill forts and earthworks allowed travellers to trek hundreds of miles with 'pinpoint accuracy' more than 5,000 years ago, amateur historian Tom Brooks says. The grid covered much of southern England
and Wales and included landmarks such as Stonehenge and Silbury Hill, claims Mr Brooks, a retired marketing executive of Honiton, Devon.
He analysed 1,500 prehistoric sites in England and Wales and was able to connect all of them to at least two other sites using isosceles triangles - these are triangles with two sides the same length.
Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk...
Originally posted by AlwaysQuestion
Did ancient man use 5,000-year-old travel chart to navigate across Britain?
Some the hills around me are just plain weird (and very obviously man made/sculpted). This article throws a reason on why they may be as they are. I'm sure there may also be a correlation to the stars but that will have to come another day. What do you think? Anywhere else like it in the world?
Originally posted by paraphi
reply to post by AlwaysQuestion
I just wonder that with so many ancient monumnets how difficult it actually is to connect them together. Therefore, how much of this is just coincidence.
As to hills being man-made etc... Well, most prominent hills in the south and west of England may well have sited a hill fort. I live right under one.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
I think another relevant question is how do these patterns factor in with Ley Lines?