I have received a lot of U2U`s lately (thanks for these it is a great feeling knowing my work is not going unnoticed), quite a few are based on my
findings, I tend to go for a simple approach on evidence that really cannot be debunked, `The camera never lies`, a good example here is the whole
thermite approach I avoid this aspect like the plague, here`s why...
1). There are loads of various cutting charges.
2). Thermite`s ingredients are very basic and a building caked in rust and an abundance of aluminium can lead to false positives.
3). Thermite is found in several explosion based composites.
4). Napalm is one.
5). Proof of thermite is not proof of it being used in a c/d.
So, with that in mind I set about fine tooth combing 100`s of pictures, now if you normally find a piece of steel with a suspicious looking cut it is
passed off as done by demolition workers, but what if you find obviously cut steels with no oxy-acetylene or thermite based residues on it?,
example....
As we all know the exterior steel sections were 3 storeys in length (36 feet) and have little squares cut out of the top and bottom of the three
vertical steels in them, this is access for a ratchet to tighten bolts, if these are missing they have been cut, what caused the cut?, also notice on
that picture that all three truss seat fixings have been cut out also, and whatever caused the cuts as plainly seen on one of the vertical steels is
not a heat based fusion, there are 5-6 scorch marks caused by a detonated and direction based wedge type blast stereotypical of one of the many
alternative to thermite cutting charges available

.