reply to post by nixie_nox
To answer your question, I don't watch the news. I watch local in the morning to see if anything catastrophic happened overnight and that is
it. Somtimes CNN to watch a vote.
Then,
you wouldn't know what FOX, or Beck or Hannity said or didn't say, would you?
They have a powerful outlet in Fox. It wasn't utilized.
How would you know. You "don't watch the news."
They have a powerful spokesperson in Palin. Controversial, but people listen. She wasn't utilized.
Again, how would you know? Because "local or CNN" didn't tell you?
Last I heard, Palin
was not a spokesperson for either the House or Senate delegations of ANY party. She has her own priorities and
agenda.
They have a spokesperson in Steele. Who I listen to quite frequently.I like him personally though he gets more weenie-ish all the time. He has
never said a word.
Actually, he DID! He and Scott Simon of NPR went 'round and 'round about
just this issue on "Morning Edition."
You need to broaden your perspective if you want a broader view of what people are saying and doing. You might be surprised.
I check places like Slate, Salon, the NYT, HuffPo and kos often, just to see what's up. Along with AFP, Reuters, and the Guardian and Telegraph.
Found Camille Paglia's scathing rebuke of the Obamacare "debacle." (her word, not mine).
Even Arianna Huffington and Camille Paglia talk about the one-sided coverage. THEY know, and discuss, the presence of and denial of alternatives to
Obamacare. (Ever listen to "Left, Right and Center?" Arianna is the "left" representative in the weekly roundtable.))
Hell they could even use Beck, Rush, or Hannity.
How would you, and your brethren, know they don't? THEY DO!
If people don't know about it, they are not going to look for something they don't even know is there.
If they CHOOSE not to know, it doesn't matter where the message is or who it's coming from.
jw
[edit on 13-9-2009 by jdub297]