It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ATH911
Could you please repost them?
Originally posted by REMISNE
You seem to forget or ignore the fact of the 2 seperate debris fileds which show more of a shoot down scene then a crash.
Also the engine core found a distance from the crash.
Originally posted by mikelee
Because the WHOLE plane didn't crash there is why the crater is so small
Originally posted by mikelee
In every single shoot down of an aircraft, it is NOT TRUE that there will always be a trail of debris leading up to it.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by mikelee
In every single shoot down of an aircraft, it is NOT TRUE that there will always be a trail of debris leading up to it.
Do you have a source for this or just your theory?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by mikelee
In every single shoot down of an aircraft, it is NOT TRUE that there will always be a trail of debris leading up to it.
Do you have a source for this or just your theory?
The plane did not need to break up in mid air to cause the debris fields. - Remisne
During the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the contents of the cockpit voice recorder of Flight 93 were played for the jury. On April 12, the government released a transcript of the recording, but not the recording itself. A report two years prior to the publication of the Commission's Report -- when the crash time was widely recognized as 10:06 -- stated that "the last seconds of the cockpit voice recorder are the loud sounds of wind, hinting at a possible hole somewhere in the fuselage."
Originally posted by mikelee
I do not do other people's research for them given the fact that there are sources one can find and determine from doing so, that what I stated is a fact. I suggest a little reading and that will allow you to arrive at the same conclusion as I.
Originally posted by mikelee
Its common knowledge as to what I stated so if you prefer to just resort to the typcial and boring "thanks for...." routine then thats fine with me.
Originally posted by mikelee
Its a fact despite that you refuse to do any of your own reasearch in order to deny ignorance.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
I have seem so many simulations as to why the twin towers collapsed and witc 7 but nothing dealing with the very small crater in shanksville.
I would love to see someone explain using a simulation and diagrams as to why the crater in Shanksville was 1/3 atleast the size of a Boeing 757 and only 6-10 feet deep.
If the plane were to come down on a 40 degree angle as the official story claims, then why was the no long oblong crater? Why is the crater in Shanksville almost round with no wing impact zones, no fire and a crater which is measured to be 10-30 feet in diameter and only 10 feet deep?