It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A flying saucer caught during an episode of the TV series "Las Vegas"

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 12 2009 @ 01:41 PM
link   
Hi, I want to report the sighting of an UFO that I have identified in an episode of the TV series "Las Vegas":

The object in question has clearly a discoid shape as seen from the video and from images, this initially appears from behind the plane so then it goes down gradually at high speed, the object is real thanks to the fact that his shape respects the perspective during its motion moreover it can be noticed that the object has its own motion.

The object is not associated with any type of identified aircraft .

The sighting video link is the following one:
www.youtube.com...

In the images "a" and "b" there are the analysis of the object in question.





The link of the episode in question is the following one:
www.megavideo.com...

what do you think about?

written by Mario Maisto

thanks


[edit on 12-9-2009 by Mario Maisto]




posted on Sep, 12 2009 @ 02:33 PM
link   
Notice where the sun is in that shot.

Notice how that object appears as the camera starts pointing closer to the direction of the sun.

They use complex lenses that look something like this:


www.cambridgeincolour.com...

It's possible for the sun to enter the front lens and bounce around inside all those reflective layers of the lenses such that an unintended reflection of the sun ends up on the image.

It looks like that's exactly what happened in the TV footage you posted on youtube.

So it's a distorted reflection of the sun, not a flying saucer.

In this picture you can see the lens flare (sun reflection) on the lower right:



It's possible for both the sun and the flare to be in the image, but it's also possible to get the flare without the sun in a complex lens, if they are shooting in the general direction of the sun, which they are in your video.

[edit on 12-9-2009 by Arbitrageur]



posted on Sep, 12 2009 @ 08:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Arbitrageur
 


Good explanation but in my opinion the object is not a reflex for the following reasons:

a) If it was a reflex this should leave a trace of widespread light during its motion.

b) Looking at the image "b" it can see the three-dimensional shape of the object.

c) For my experience in watching UFO sightings video I noticed that UFOs have the ability to camouflage themselves in fact there are videos and images where these unindentified objects aren't detected by simple cameras or even by human eyes, an example is the video shooted (that I subsequently propose) in Mexico where unidentified objects were detected only by the infrared cameras and standard radar:

www.youtube.com...

so when the object in question is to the right of the plane is camouflaged and rises suddenly on the underside of the plane in progressive mode and during his motion the object in question increases its brightness and his visibility .... I propose the image "c" when the object appears under the plane and it is not fully visible.

d) The object emits particular light beams during its motion as is the image "d".








[edit on 12-9-2009 by Mario Maisto]



posted on Sep, 12 2009 @ 08:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mario Maisto
reply to post by Arbitrageur
 


good explanation but in my opinion the object is not a reflex for the following reasons:

a) If it was a reflex this should leave a trace of widespread light during its motion.


If you want to cite a source for me to read on this I'll read it. But if by reflex, you mean "lens flare", then the size we see is just what we'd expect from lens flare, there's no reason it has to be bigger. Also note it's the motion of the camera that results in the motion of the flare.


b) Looking at the image "b" it can see the three-dimensional shape of the object.
To me it's hard to make out any 3-dimensional shapes from just a few pixels. But if you really want to get picky, the sun is a 3 dimensional object, so if it is a reflection of the sun then theoretically that might account for seeing 3 dimensions if you really think you see that. I just see a reflection.


c) We know that UFOs have the ability to camouflage themselves in fact there are videos and images where these unindentified objects aren't detected by simple cameras or even by human eyes, an example is the video shooted (that I subsequently propose) in Mexico where unidentified objects were detected only by the infrared cameras and standard radar:


"We" know that? No my friend I don't think "we" do because I'm part of "we" and I don't know that. I look at each individual case as unique. What I do know is that what the camera records is not always what we see, as in the case of "rods" for example, which are actually flying insects or birds.


d) The object emits particular light beams during its motion as is the image "d".


That looks like the same reflection to me.

Well you asked what it was and I told you, you are welcome to dismiss my explanation but I think if you do you are missing a valuable opportunity to learn a very basic point about photography.

Try reading some of the link I posted under the lens image, or Google "lens flare" and read up on that so you understand it. If you know any professional photographers, show them this video and ask them if it's lens flare and see if they confirm it, you don't have to take just my word for it. I'm only trying to help you my friend, not argue with you. I hope you understand.


Best regards,

Arby



posted on Sep, 12 2009 @ 09:02 PM
link   
Hi Arby, I want to premise that:

- What I have said before is only a my opinion and I don't want to convince anyone that what I have said must be equal for everyone.
- I corrected the sentence at the b) point when I have said "We Know"
- I appreciated and respect much your explanation, it is much professional.
- I don't have a knowledge in the photography subject.
- I am searching to learn what you have said me about photography and I am very happy for your comment that is very complete and interesting and your interest in my reporting is been for me very important.

best regards from Italy

Mario Maisto



posted on Sep, 13 2009 @ 12:01 PM
link   
Mario has a lot of those UFO while filming legit entertainment
which the Illuminati control as well as the UFO saucer or Tesla ship.

I left Mario a comment:
Saucer owners are involved in the Illuminati movie and TV business because
they have suppressed Tesla technology. So they know where to go, sometimes
cast members or celebrities get a ride, think about Jimi Hendrix and his UFO
fantasies which he sang about.

Comment Pending yet he usually passes me.

ED: The light is illuminated air perhaps surrounding the craft and
only picked up by cameras.
The light bending ability of high voltage has never been studied
as we may assume the ability is already in use.


[edit on 9/13/2009 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Sep, 14 2009 @ 05:52 AM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


I am happy that you support Tesla theories because Nikola Tesla is been one of the greatest experts about electromagnetism phenomenon and I know that electromagnetism phenomenon is linked to the UFO concepts.



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join